Technology Forces at Work. Profiles of Environmental Research and Development at DuPont, Intel, Monsanto, and Xerox, 1998

Background

The environmental literature recognizes the importance of involving multiple stakeholders in the environmental policy development process. Stakeholders include a diverse set of individuals and organizations-local citizens and community groups, consumers, environmental groups, industry; individual companies,
shareholders, all levels of government and tribes, etc. In turn, each of these will have various perspectives on environmental risk, priorities, costs and benefits, etc.

One area of environmental policy that has not received a lot of emphasis in the past is technology innovation. Because of this, there is limited information on how one of these key stakeholders, industry, views environmental research and technology innovation. This report summarizes information about the following:

  • How research-intensive companies are rethinking investments in environmental technologies; where these companies are likely to invest, where they
    will not invest, and where opportunities for public-private sector partnerships are; and
  • What federal policies the case-study companies would like to see to promote investments in environmental research and technology;

The work was sponsored by both the Environment and Technology Divisions of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. The information contained in this summary is based on a series of interviews with senior environmental research and technology managers and environmental, health, and safety personnel in four research-intensive companies. The complete report that presents more detail on the results and the case studies of the companies is Technology Forces at Work: Profiles of Environmental R&D at DuPont, Intel, Monsanto, and Xerox, MR-1068-0STP, 1999, by Susan Resetar with Beth Lachman, Robert Lempert, and Monica Pinto. The results of this study should be useful for federal, state, local, and tribal environmental and R&D policymakers and scientists; industrial managers and planners; and university researchers.

Continue scrolling for more...

Originally created by Congress in 1991 as the Critical Technologies Institute and renamed in 1998, the Science and Technology Policy Institute is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the National Science Foundation and managed by RAND. The institute’s mission is to help improve public policy by conducting objective, independent research and analysis on policy issues that involve science and technology.

Document Archive

 Technology Forces at Work. Profiles of Environmental Research and Development at Dupont, Intel, Monsanto, and Xerox, 1998 [24 Pages, 1.4MB]

https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/environment/FOIA17-81.pdf

Follow The Black Vault on Social Media:

This post was published on July 28, 2017 9:07 pm

John Greenewald

Recent Posts

The Robert F. Kennedy Assassination Records Archive

In January 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14176, titled "Declassification of Records…

April 28, 2025

FOIA Release Reveals Secret Charter Behind Creation of Pentagon’s UAP Task Force

Nearly five years ago, The Black Vault filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request…

April 23, 2025

Lake Erie, Saudi Arabia, and Dugway: Army Records Trace UAP Surveillance Footprint

A newly released set of U.S. Army intelligence records offers a rare glimpse into behind-the-scenes…

April 22, 2025

DOD Polygraph Institute 1999 Audiovisual Training Archive

In 1999, the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute (DoDPI) released a bibliography of audiovisual training…

April 8, 2025

J.F.K. Assassination Records Archive – Previously Withheld JFK Assassination Documents Database

Background The assassination of John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States, is…

April 7, 2025

The Pentagon Says AATIP Wasn’t About UFOs—But the Man Slated to Take It Over Ended Up Designing the Government’s UAP Strategy

A newly released batch of documents, obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), reveals…

April 2, 2025