John Greenewald: That's right everybody. As always, thank you
so much for tuning in and making this your podcast or your live
stream of choice. I'm your host, John Greenwald, Jr. and today
I'm doing a little bit of a breakdown of a document that
I've talked quite a bit about, or at least mentioned on this
channel, and also in podcasts, that has really not been been
put into detail in the way that I like, because some people will
hear me talk about it. And they will hear me talk about the
secrecy deepening behind UAP. And go what is John talking
about? We hear about UAP all the time, it's in legislation. It's
being bantered about and congressional hallways. This is
it. We're on a road to disclosure. Well, Oh, contraire,
because there is stuff going on now behind the scenes. And now
this document coming out kind of showing the world that secrecy
is clamping down on this topic. Now I first got this document
again, it's called a security classification guide or in
brief, a SC G. Late last year in 2021. It didn't make a whole lot
of headlines, because I mean, I'll be honest with you, it's
just not sexy. I use that phrase a lot. Because it's the truth,
you need some flashy, some kind of mind blowing information or
implication behind documents to get that national attention.
This didn't really get that, nor did I expect it to but to be
honest with you, it's probably one of the, again, in my
opinion, one of the most important documents that I've
gotten in regards to UAP. Now, why is that? And let me go ahead
and tell you guys get my laser pointer here. So I can point to
some stuff. This is the cover page unidentified aerial
phenomena security classification guide, Id 04 dash
z 030, from the Naval intelligence activity, or n i a.
Now, why do I think that this is the most important document?
Well, just to give a very brief background, I was going to do a
little bit more history on the SCGS. But I decided not to I
welcome you guys all to look it up. It's not exclusive to UAP.
But the In short, the nutshell version, is that every topic
program, or type of information has a guide on how it's
classified. Some is very generic, meaning there's not a
specific guide for every little thing that may be classified,
but rather, you'll find them for more specific programs, or, in
this case, topics. And and what essentially they do is they
break down how and why to classify it. And it defines the
secrecy behind again, that program or the topic. So in this
case here UAP. So this SCG, defines the security
classification behind UAP and outlines that any information
that's created by UAP breaks down essentially, what is
classified and what's not. Another way to kind of summarize
that is, when you create a memo, a report, you don't just go
well, it's top secret, you know, there's a reason that things are
top secret, there's a reason that things are secret, or
confidential, or unclassified for official use only. So there
are manuals and stipulations for all of that, that breaks down
why things are classified. So let's get into this document
here because I knew back in, I think 20, early 2020, they were
working on this. And through FOIA found banter by Joseph grad
Usher within the Navy emails, that was kind of the first thing
that confirmed it in writing, just through research and
talking prior to that, I already had a request in for it, because
I knew that this thing was either being worked on or likely
on the books already. So my request was already there. But
then I got supporting evidence through another FOIA release,
that the one of the spokespeople talking about UAP when they
still were, within the US Navy, talked about a security
classification guide, again, defining the secrecy for UAP. So
I knew it was a matter of time before I can at least get
hopefully some of this released to the general public. When I
finally got it late last year. It was heavily redacted. We'll
go over every page. It's not too lengthy, but I at least want to
break it down for you guys to help prove my point of when I
referenced this deepening secrecy. This is why this
particular page we can't I read the majority of the names except
the approval, Mr. Scott Bray. Now, if that name doesn't sound
familiar to you, he was one of the ones that testified before
Congress. And essentially, he approved all the secrecy. So
when
they deny me or deny you or deny a, a journalist asking at a at a
press podium or a press conference, and they say no,
Scott Bray is the one who approved all of this secrecy. So
to have him testify at the hearing, I had already known his
name by this and I thought, Okay, well, we're probably not
going to learn too much. To my surprise, we actually learned
more than what I thought, but regardless, it was still not as
much as obviously we all wanted. But he's the man that approved
it. The reviewer from the special security offices or SSO
US Navy, we don't know who that is, but there was a review
process there. And then the preparation Office of Naval
Intelligence or Oh, and I this was the location of the UAP task
force at the time, I will bet money that that is Jay Stratton.
You know, it's it kind of makes sense. Jay Stratton was the one
that originally wrote the statements that I got way back I
believe in 2019. It was September 11, is when I
published that story that truly did go viral it was picked up by
hundreds of outlets throughout the world when they finally went
on the record and said those three videos they labeled as UAP
are designated them as UAP. The reason why that story was so big
was that they had never acknowledged the video's
authenticity, even though again, most everybody assumed them to
be true. They never wanted to talk about them, or address them
or admit that they were officially released. So with
those facts, they never talked about what was in the videos. So
we know Luis Elizondo describe them on paper in his official
filing as drones balloons and UAS. But what was odd was, they
labeled him as UAP. I was floored by that I didn't expect
it. And and again, that story went viral. When I did
subsequent FOIA requests to that story, I had discovered that
although Joseph grad Usher again that spokesperson for Navy gave
me that statement, it was Jay Stratton, who had created that
statement, and in fact, the statement was much longer gratis
or cut it down. I was able to get the full statement published
it months later. It was at that moment, Jay Stratton was a
mystery to everyone. Well, you know, despite a select few
insiders, but J. Stratton was a mystery to the general public. I
had no idea who he was until that moment, that's when he went
on my radar and I have followed him ever since. Since then, it
came out that he was involved in the UAP effort. Going back to
the OSS, AP days, likely is Axelrod and skinwalkers at the
Pentagon, but I've never officially confirmed that. But
again, there was a lot of rumors because people started talking
about this guy. But he's been on my radar for years for that
reason, because if you're crafting the statement, about
UAP, you are someone it was then assumed he was the director of
the UAP ETF, but never confirmed, never confirmed
through official statements that I'm aware of. I've never seen
one, but ironically, got it confirmed through a NASA FOIA
release mistake or not, I'm not sure. But they revealed J
Stratton's name and refer to him as the director of the UAP task
force. So that solidified it, again, some of these things we
kind of logically conclude. But then when we get the hardcore
evidence, then you can use that in future cases, and so on. So
that's the breakdown of the signature page. Here's the next
page section one identifying data as just the identifying
data to the SCG itself. The subject unidentified aerial
phenomenon, the unit of primary responsibility, that's the PR,
the Office of Naval Intelligence, the certifying
authority ca Mr. Scott Bray, Director, Naval Intelligence
Agency, top secret original classification authority,
effective 17 June 2019. So we know that even before it was
officially approved, there was stuff in 2019 that was likely
still defining that secrecy for UAP. This was, I believe, the
official date of publication, which was April 16 2020. And
then I believe the AR D stands for rescind date. So it
essentially stays on the books until April 16th 2025, unless it
is extended the rd. Prior to this, I couldn't quite find a
document to authenticate that acronym, but I'm pretty sure
it's person date, and they're going to use it until then again
or if something is published.
Section Two general instructions the purpose this classification
guide is issued for the purpose of identifying specific topics
of information associated with the Office of Naval Intelligence
unidentified aerial phenomenon tax task force that meet the
standards and criteria for classification and protection.
In accordance with executive order 13526 classified national
security information as amended and its implementing directives.
Authority this guide is issued under authority of secnav M
551 0.36 and executive order 13526 dod manual 50 200.01
volumes one through four. This guide constitutes authority and
may be cited as the basic classification regrading or
declassification of information and material involved in UAP
collection and analysis. Changes in classification required by
application of this guide shall be made immediately. Information
identified in this guide for protection as classified
information is classified by the director, naval intelligence
activity, a top secret original classification authority.
Classification challenges if at any time security classification
guidance contained here in is challenged, or temporary markers
of a higher classification are made. The items of information
and ball shelves continued to be protected at the level
prescribed by this guide. Until a formal decision by an
appropriate authority is made. Classification challenges should
be addressed to the PR or primary responsibility office
generally you see that as OPR noted in section one above,
reproduction next extraction and dissemination this guide may be
reproduced and disseminated as needed, however, to ensure
receipt of updates, revisions and classification changes.
Whenever this guide is disseminated beyond an initial
address notify the PR public release the fact that this guide
shows certain details of information to be unclassified,
including controlled unclassified information does
not allow automatic public release of this information. DOD
or navy information requested by the media or members of the
public or proposed for release to the public, by DOD, civilians
or military personnel, or their contractors shall be processed
in accordance with DoD manual 5200 dot dat dot 01 secnav M
dash 551 0.36 dod directives 5230 dot o nine DoD Instruction
523 0.29, DOD 50 400.7 dash r and Secretary of the Navy
instruction 57 20.42 G as applicable. I'm reading that
obviously for the audio version and those taking notes. Proposed
public disclosures of unclassified information
regarding UAP shall be processed through the cognizant and IA or
Naval Intelligence Agency Freedom of Information Act
officer. Let me stop right there. What's really interesting
about this, and this is just a little bit of speculation. But
DoD or navy information requested by the media or
members of the public or proposed for released to the
public by DOD, civilians, or military personnel or their
contractors shall be processed and in accordance with what's
interesting is they have to stipulate all that because you
go back to the gimbal, the FLIR and the go fast videos. At that
time, there was no security classification guide for UAP
information. So it was proposed to be released through what's
called a DD Form 1910 filed by Luis Elizondo, these videos
which the Navy labeled as UAP, which this document defines
would or should be classified secret or above. If, if it goes
in this guide would apply. But in 2017, when Louise Elizondo
filed that there was no security classification guide, so they
were either mislabeled, not properly labeled, you fill in
the blank, but regardless, they were not ever talked or labeled
UAP but rather again, balloon UAS, drones, and so on. So there
was no mention of it. This is stipulating that anything that
falls under this category that's being proposed for release like
a DD Form 1910 This has to apply, which you will learn in a
few minutes, puts it at a security classification of
secret, or above, which would be top secret. So this defined all
that so is that line in there to ensure that if anybody else came
along and filed a DD Form 1910 and said, Hey, this balloon
video should be declassified. It's not going to slip through
the cracks. So very interesting line there that I felt was there
for a reason. But let me stress that's just speculation.
All right. Number six foreign disclosure. And don't worry,
there's not a whole lot of reading here just simply because
a lot of it's redacted which we'll learn in a minute. Foreign
disclosure any disclosure to foreign officials have
information classified by this guide, shall be in accordance
with the procedures set forth and Secretary of the Navy
instruction 55 10.34 A and Department of the Navy foreign
trust closure manual of September 2007. If a country
sorry, if a country with which the DOD has entered into a
reciprocal procurement memorandum of understanding or
offset arrangement expresses an interest in this effort, a
foreign disclosure review must be conducted prior to issuance
of a solicitation, seven definitions unidentified aerial
phenomena, any aerial phenomenon that cannot be immediately
identified period. That's their identification and definition of
what a UAP is. This, here's the essentially what they call the
authority block. This is put at the bottom of the pages that are
classified and classified with this as the authority. So
essentially, you will see references to the SCG of
whatever the topic or program name at hand that defines that
classification. In this case, in this case, it's telling anybody
using the manual this is how you identify a classified document.
And the authority being this guide, classified by Mr. Scott
Bray, Director naval intelligence activity reason 1.4
See declassify on. And then I'll show you some real examples of
this, but essentially the date that it's declassified on
identification where information pertaining to UAP has been
obtained or developed through the use of classified sources or
methods. The proper classification of a result an
item of information or material will be the highest
classification set forth. And either this classification Guide
or the classification guide, or guides applicable to the sources
or method use to obtain UAP information or material.
Accordingly, information about UAP designated here in as secret
slash Ral Fe UI may well be top secret, slash SCR special,
special compartmentalised information slash no foreign or
no foreign intelligence due to the sources or methods through
which the UAP information was collected. In those cases, where
the sources or methods used to acquire the UAP information or
material would lead to a higher classification level, the
applicable SCG pertaining to those sources or methods should
be cited as the classification authority, not this guide. In
other words, in plain English, because I know that's a
mouthful. UAP information comes in at the secret level, any
sources methods, or let's say like an instrumentation or
something like that, that gathered that information,
you're not going to put top secret acquired information in a
secret document. So essentially, you're going to have a top
secret classification on it. And then in again, more legal jargon
and their military speak. Instead of referencing the UAP
security classification Guide, You Will rather reference that
other authority that authorized that top secret level, you'll
see here, now we're starting to get into quite a bit of blacked
out information. Number three, so that whole number two is is
redacted. We don't know what that is. Number three goal and
mission, the mission of this task force is to detect, analyze
and consolidate and exploit advanced non traditional
aerospace vehicles posing an operational threat to US
national security and avoid strategic surprise. And item. So
this essentially now defines the level of secrecy as it pertains
to UAP at different levels. And it starts with the stuff that is
unclassified. And you'll, this is going to get a little small
for me, so I may have to lean in here. But I forgot to zoom in on
the next slide. But regardless, this again, defines what level
of secrecy certain things are starting with unclassified,
which is stuff that they can give out. And you'll see it tie
in to Pentagon spokespeople, statements and stuff like that.
So things that they're okay for you for allowing you and I to
know that's unclassified. And so they define that. And so anybody
using this guide can start blind and go Okay, number one, the
term unidentified aerial phenomena is unclassified. So
they know that they can say UAP out in the open, sounds silly,
but all of those things have to do to be defined. Other examples
of showing why that's not silly is a classified code word. So in
a classification guy with a with a code word, it'll show you if
you say this code word, it's classified secret or top secret.
The fact that Navy pilots and other Department of the Navy
personnel have
witnessed and the certain Department of Navy technical
systems have detected at unspecified times in places UAPs
that fact is unclassified. I'm gonna see if I can zoom in. Hey,
it worked. Awesome. All right. Now I can read this is Let me
see if I can. I've never done this feature before. Nope, we
can't knuckles. All right. No laser pointer but I'm at one see
the fact that the frequency of UAP sightings has increased in
recent years without any further information regarding when,
where or how often sightings have been reported. That's
obviously unclassified one D, the fact that Navy has an
ongoing effort to gain knowledge and insight into the nature and
origins of UAPs, as well as their operations, capabilities,
performance and or signatures on classified. The fact that naval
intelligence in general, and the Office of Naval Intelligence in
particular, has created a task force to gain knowledge and
insight into the nature and origins of UAPs as well as their
operations capabilities, performance and or signatures on
classified goal, mission and purpose. The fact that the task
force Task Force's mission is to detect, analyze, catalogue,
consolidate and exploit non traditional aerospace vehicles
UAP posing an operational threat to US national security and
avoid strategic surprise, obviously unclassified. So if
you follow Pentagon statements, a lot of those facts, even some
of the exact wording was in that. So that's all things that
they are comfortable talking about in the open. This here is
where it gets really interesting, because now we have
no idea what they're talking about. We have no idea what
points about UAP, they will not let out in the open. And you can
see here, I love this feature, I had no idea that it's available.
Zooming in here, this header, I was able to get out
intelligence, collection, exploitation, analysis, and
products. Now, why is this interesting and fascinating to
me, it's generally the word exploitation, what are they
exploiting? And that's a big question, Mark. I mean, we only
have speculation at this point, everybody talks about crash
retrievals and stuff that they have in their possession. And
that's all well and good. And it probably sounds a lot sexier
than it probably is. But this here, I think, is starting to
show between exploitation and analysis, that there are things
revolving around those words, exploiting and analyzing, that
shows that when it comes to UAP, they have something, whether
it's a piece of a foreign drone, whether it's a piece of computer
chip that they stole from some Chinese factory, or Russian
factory, whatever. Again, it's pure speculation. But to me,
this is telling me that there are points underneath this
blacked out material that tie into exploiting and analyzing
whatever it is about UAP. And it's all classified. Now, of
course, you can analyze a video and that's fine. I mean, sure
that there may be some lines in here. But can you exploit a
video? And I would say probably not. Can you exploit the
technology? Yes. That's where I lean towards. Now. Again, I'm
stressing the speculation part, because we have no idea. But
regardless, this header is fascinating to me. Also, I
always like to point this out. See the difference in redactions
here. I would bet that this is a header. And this is number four,
just looking at the page ahead. And whoever reviewed it first,
which gave these redactions with the red citation, which you'll
see the majority of you look at this one, it was added after, I
bet you this was a second layer review. The first person thought
it was okay to release this header. Second person said no
way, they redacted it for the same national security reason,
and they don't tell us. So I always think those are fun,
because there are certain people that would have let that slide
other people not so much. So in the end, we've got a whole lot
of redaction there. This also supports this is header number
three, this likely was number four because the next page is
number five, I zoomed it in here five relationships all redacted.
As noted in this as the footnote to that section, so something in
here references this as noted in section one paragraph B where
information pertaining to UAP has been obtained or developed
through the use of classified sources or methods. The proper
classification of a result an item of information on material
will be the highest classification what is stated in
this classification Guide or the classification guide or guides
applicable to the sources or methods used to obtain the UAP
information or material. Accordingly, the classification
level noted below may be incorrect. If the source or
method used to collect the information dictates a higher
level of classification. Still, pretty much the same language
already went over, but they footnote it I wanted to make
sure that I go over this here. I think that this was meant to be
one of the first pages on This is more than just the cover page
for the classification guide, identifying marks, stuff like
that. I won't go over every line, but I wanted to show it to
you as part of the four year release, it was at the end of
the packet, and so on. Now, why does this matter? Right? I know
some of that's dry. And some of you haven't really seen a lot of
the comments and stuff that I bet some of them are, you know,
like, Oh, my God, this is boring. It actually is. But
here's the bottom line of everything that I just went
through. And that is when you look at all the secrecy, it
essentially mandates that other those other than those
unclassified points that I went over, that you can read,
everything about UAP is automatically put at a secret
level, everything beyond those basic points, everything. It's
defined here, all of those other points, all those other aspects,
all of those other exploitation, realities, all that other
analysis, data points and stuff like that all classified secret,
if not above. So this is the reason this is the hindrance
from us knowing what's real, and the guy that's testifying to
Congress is the one that approved all this. He's the one
that said, Yep, no, this is this is great, guys, I fully support
this level of secrecy. And you can see here, there's a lot,
couple points, we can read all basic. We've known them for
years, everything else 100%. classified, they won't tell you.
So that conversation that has changed, which is great in the
last few years. And I'm very encouraged that there's
congressional legislation and stuff like that, all of that is
fine. But the problem is at the end of the day, is that you get
very little why because the guy that's testifying as the guy
that approved the secrecy, and that secrecy that he approved,
essentially classifies almost everything. And so even though
we hear the words UAP, and they're talking about it within
the halls of Congress, and there's some legislation going
out there, the bottom line is, Senators and Congressmen will
not disobey their security oath. And even though they love to
tell you and I that there's this push for transparency, and we
want to tell you what happened at that UAP hearing, when it got
interesting, and certain questions, and certain angles
that came up, we can talk about that more in a closed session.
That's what we're going to be faced with and how many that
were in that hearing pushed back. I didn't see any, none of
them said None. No, no, you know what the public deserves to
know. Now? Of course not, because they are going to
appreciate what needs to be kept secret. So when we get to a
level that has anything to do with any of that, that I just
went over, it's classified, and we likely will not see pushback
from it. So will we get some trickle down information? Sure,
absolutely. And it'll satisfy congressional mandates. And
we'll get another June 2021 report that was nine pages long
and told us very little, there was some nuggets in there. But
again, very little, some statistics, some kind of cool
stuff. New, arguably not really, it was just kind of putting some
fancier language and a little bit more concrete affirmation on
what we already knew. Other than that, not so much. Why this, and
that was the issue with all of that. So let me show you some
real time examples of what Now this does. I'm going to start
with someone else's FOIA request. I highlighted this on
the black vault.com. But I'm starting with Alex Garcia's
request, great researcher who discovered that within the naval
intelligence activity, there was a top secret information memo
that essentially was about unidentified aerial phenomenon,
but was essentially entirely blacked out. And you'll notice
here at the bottom, that classified authority block most
people just blow right past it, because it just looks like you
know, some additional jargon nobody really cares about. So
they look at all the information and it's all blacked out. These
are the first two pages.
But when you zoom in, this is what authorized all of that
classification, the UAP security classification guide, what we
just went over. That information that was all blacked out is not
scheduled to be declassified until 2045. Again, thanks to
that guide. Now, will it come out prior to that? I won't get
off on too much of a tangent here. Yes, there's absolutely
possibilities. There are mandatory declassification
reviews. So if you get somebody who takes your case that you put
up and agrees that it should be declassified, or something
happens where what is classified here in 2022 is not classified
and 2025 that they don't have to wait until 2045 to declassify
it. They'll do it ahead of time. But right now it's mandated to
stay classy file until 2045. Thanks to this manual here. This
is what happened this week that I thought, hey, let's just go
ahead and do this video. And there were a bunch of it's like
70 Plus pages of what these range Fowler reports are. And
we've seen some of these range follow reports. If you don't
know what a range Fowler is, it's essentially something that
encroaches on a training exercise is kind of the very
quick nutshell version. We saw references to the range Fowler's
in the June 2021, UAP. Report. And look, I mean, I'll be
honest, I didn't no idea what that was. It was an interesting
term. But once you start digging in, it really does sound like
let's say they're doing a exercise of some kind. A large
balloon goes into their training exercise that could potentially
interfere with their exercise. Some Joe Schmoe on the outside
of the military facility drives, flies a commercial drone, and
they're potentially a danger, potentially a surveillance
surveillance issue. Those are considered range fallers. But
also within are some additional encounter. So I'm not trying to
dismiss the importance of these. But the problem is look at all
that redaction. And I was going to do a video when these came
out, breaking them down. But it's so hard to read these
documents anyway, where you go and then redacted and then it
flute redacted and made a write redacted. It's ridiculous. And
you can see here absolutely god awful. It really is, as I kind
of zoom in there, zoom around, and you guessed it. See here at
the bottom. It's all authorized by the UAP security
classification guide. Again, the roadblock that that small
document that I just went through is the roadblock to all
of this. So now we have all of these real world examples of why
I'm saying secrecy is deepening. Prior to 2019 2018. They denied
UFO interest, but I was able to show, in my opinion, undeniable
proof of that I'm working on a what will be a rather large,
live, free hangout slash presentation to all of you on
this channel. So stay tuned for that. What I will do is go over
that information kind of dealing with primarily the era between
the close of project Bluebook and the revolution about a tip.
And in my opinion, there's ample evidence that there was a cover
up, that they were seeing UFOs that they were reporting UFOs
around the globe that they were collecting intelligence. So
despite what they were saying, there's all this information
that proves otherwise. But there was no mandate for automatic
classification. So you'll actually see like, for example,
the 1976 Iran incident, where you have a amazing encounter
that some argue may be explainable. But let's face it,
we don't have an adequate one yet, where you have multiple
UFOs being seen. It's infamously known as the 1976 arann
incident, the original dia report, the
intelligence report was unclassified. Now, let me use
that as a real world example today, despite there being an
explanation or not doesn't matter. If there is a UAP
security classification guide in 1976, that I just showed you,
that report would have automatically been done as
secret, if not top secret for whatever other reason might
apply. But instead, that document along with quite a few
others, remained unclassified, because there was not that, that
mandate for it to become classified. Other records were
classified that dealt with UAP or UFOs. But that was mandated
by other classification reasons, let's say a source and method
that was defined somewhere else. So I don't want to get too much
in the weeds there. But my whole point is, is that there are
reports unclassified at the unclassified level that have
come out from these intelligence agencies. That because there was
no classification guide that mandated the automatic
classification of it, people like me could come along and get
it, it's a makes it a little bit easier. This, the classification
guide is making it harder. So I wanted to go over that with you
guys. Break down some real world examples. And again, support why
I say that security, I feel is deepening this talk about we're
in the midst of disclosure. Look, I think it's great that
some people think that but the evidence doesn't support it
disclosure of what we haven't heard anything yet. And just
because Congress is again, muttering the phrases and
acronyms of UAP and unidentified aerial phenomenon, so on and so
forth, all of that is great. The problem is the evidence doesn't
support that disclosure. Talk. And in fact that secrecy is
deepening. And in fact, the same voices that are telling you we
want transparency, and we're going to require reports are
getting very minimal reports. But then on top of that, when
being told, we can talk more about that in a classified
setting, they go, okay, not a problem, you know, we can talk,
why, because it doesn't matter if they push back or not,
they're going to hear it anyway, then their security oaths and,
and clearances take over, and then they don't come out and
tell you or I, they just say they're working on it, or
there's something strange, or we need to fund this. But we don't
get the answers that we're looking for. So that's my
justification for saying that the secrecy is deepening. So
that said, I appreciate all of you listening or watching, if
you're watching on YouTube, it's a huge help, please give me a
thumbs up on the video that really does help with the
algorithms. And on top of that, if you're not already, please
subscribe to the channel. It's a huge help to me, if you're
listening to the audio podcast version, thank you so much for
doing so. If you're not aware that I have those, it's under
the black vault radio on Spotify, iTunes, whatever your
your favorite radio podcast aggregator of choices, or you
can stream directly from the blackbolt.com. Download the mp3
to your audio devices, whatever you need. But wherever you're
listening, if you could add a review, huge, huge help. I won't
tell you what to put, I do shoot for five stars with these
things. But please, if you can, that's a huge help to me. All
the important links like the links to the document, the
security classification guide range, Fowler reports, all that
I will put in the description below on YouTube and the show
notes on the podcast version. That said, thank you all for
listening and watching. This is John Greenewald, Jr signing off,
and we'll see you next time.