A Fundamental Explanation for UAPs | Unidentified Flying Objects | Forum

A A A
Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log In
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Related Related Topics sp_TopicIcon
A Fundamental Explanation for UAPs
February 7, 2021
11:08 am
Avatar
UAPTheory
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
January 27, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello everyone!

This is raising a lot of heads right now and it's time to put it here, too.

Recently, I have formulated a fundamental theory on UAPs by making their intense accelerations compatible with the laws of motion in general relativity. This leads to a fundamental understanding of their propulsion method and a whole list of consequences that turn out to explain practically everything we know and observe about UAPs, and it can demonstrate their origin to be non-mundane. One can even predict their geometric shape and lack of control surfaces - and then some!

https://www.uaptheory.com

I decided to make this a resource that would allow anyone in the public to understand the whole thing from start to finish, trying to make it as understandable and clear as possible.

February 16, 2021
11:40 am
Avatar
Michael Horn
New Member
Level 0
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
February 16, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

EDIT FROM ADMIN: Due to numerous messages and harassment by Michael Horn over the years, I have decided to ban his account and remove his message here since he started up again with his same tactics. He has attacked many, including myself, over the years, and he is not worth anyone's time.

I apologize for having to do so, but he surfaces from time to time to create issues. To be honest, I was surprised to hear he was still trying to push the Billy Meier hoax.

That said, that part of the discussion is done.

February 16, 2021
1:06 pm
Avatar
gambeir
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 13, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hey Michael, greetings to you, as both yourself and John Greenewald have been on the front lines since forever, and so it's nice to see you post here.

It's been some good deal of time since I reviewed your archives of the interviews/records of the Meier future forecasts, and could not go by memory, but recall being greatly impressed by their accuracy.

You don't have to defend Meier's to me, or probably anyone whose had real dealing with the likes of counter intelligence, which is to say nothing and has nothing on the dirty tricks departments of these people.

I think we should discuss supposed aliens in another thread, such as the; "What do Aliens Want."

Generally speaking I would have to agree with you in toto about revelations/disclosure, which is why myself, along with others such as UAP Theory, are working to unravel the whole on our own as there is no other possible solution.

What I'm trying to do right now is to establish whether or not UAP Theory is an individual or a consortium of academic's. With the later being my perception given the presentation at his link.

There's a reason for this which drives directly at the material idea of so-called disclosure, which is that the outcry for disclosure is fueling an necessary explanation, an explanation which has to be formulated so as to contain, control, and restrict full understanding of the real physics, which is why an invention called Quantum Physics was created to massage with science the supposedly rational explanation of the physics behind UFO's.

UAP Theory is based on accepted academia, which is fundamentally incorrect because it's working off of Einstein's ideas about space being something which does something, which is wrong and so it can never give a real and proper understanding.

Nevertheless, my purpose is not to pick fights and bicker, but to try to use what insights there are in this theory to help myself, if no one else, to a greater understanding.

February 19, 2021
7:05 pm
Avatar
Paul W
New Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
February 19, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Michael Horn is very professional with his research and has consistently passed on vital and accurate information from the German contact reports related to Covid-19 from the beginning of the pandemic. This is important for many people, as is the other warnings in the material. Gordon Cooper was convinced of the case while many others who do not put the time in trip over the questionable parts that were meant to create a ufo controversy and not definitive proof.

February 15, 2021
8:06 am
Avatar
gambeir
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 13, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello UAP Theory and thanks for posting your theory here. I am looking over your material in detail right now.

In looking at your material it seems to me that you do not represent a single individual, but rather are part of a group collaborating on this as a project, and so could you please comment on that perception and tell me whether or not I am correct.

In either event I feel that what I'm looking at is very interesting and useful and shows an extreme devotion to forming an explanation based upon officially approved academia, which I would further say is not the same thing as saying it is truly science, but nevertheless could be useful if properly put in a correct context.

February 18, 2021
11:59 am
Avatar
UAPTheory
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
January 27, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

gambeir said
Hello UAP Theory and thanks for posting your theory here. I am looking over your material in detail right now.

In looking at your material it seems to me that you do not represent a single individual, but rather are part of a group collaborating on this as a project, and so could you please comment on that perception and tell me whether or not I am correct.

In either event I feel that what I'm looking at is very interesting and useful and shows an extreme devotion to forming an explanation based upon officially approved academia, which I would further say is not the same thing as saying it is truly science, but nevertheless could be useful if properly put in a correct context.

  

Hi Gambeir, 

No, I'm just using the academic "we" on the website. Yes, I think it's about time we had a proper theory that delivers a fundamental explanation on what UAPs actually do. More and more people are coming around. I myself changed my mind on UAPs only in December 2020, in part because of exoplanet research and the Pentagon release. And it's rather interesting that all it took was 1 physicist with the right background to look at this seriously to come up with an explanation that predicts everything we know about UAPs. It shows how understandable these vehicles are and how much we would grow as a species if we just began to take this seriously. If everyone was united on this, they wouldn't be able to stay hidden and would likely begin making open contact. The presence of ETs, which I am now very much aware of, has changed the way I act and think about the future.

February 19, 2021
2:59 pm
Avatar
gambeir
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 13, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks for the reply. You've done an amazing job and I don't want to take away anything from the fantastic work you've done but are you aware of the work of Ken Wheeler in formulating the "Dielectric Simplex Theory." I feel this theory is a superior theory and you may want to examine it as you go along towards the future.

Dielectric Simplex Theory is the theory of magnetism as I understand it.

All knowledge is fluid ya know and the thing about Ken Wheeler's theory is it's much easier to understand and fundamentally more logical because there is a strong scientific history which supports it, and I think that it is really the only theory which can logically explain UFO's/UAP's.

My hat's off to you however because Quantum Physics is insanely complex so I don't know how you did it but you've done an amazing job working with it. Having said that I would also hasten to add that Quantum Physics has problems in my mind.

First off, Quantum Physics is an atomistic science which is attempting to deal with something which is fundamentally incorporeal, and really it should have been called Ether Science because that's what it's trying to deal with, and second, it's roots are also tied to those idea's and concepts which grew out of the notions of Einsteinian physics. As such it has incorporated such ideas as there being other dimensions, and it's done this based upon mathematical calculations but mathematics is not empirical evidence and that evidence suggests that the theory of multiple dimensions is probably wildly inaccurate.

Real physical evidence suggests that there is only our dimension and that of another counter spatial field, commonly referred to as counter space, and that field is not another dimension in the way that dimensions have been portrayed. It is not a place with many worlds. It is only a reservoir of interial energy.

 

One primary characteristic of UFO's & UAP's has been dark/black/blackened and or boiling like clouds. This blackness is the result of dielectric voidance. Meaning that the surrounding dielectric field is non-existent, which indicates it's being cycled back to counter~space. Often there are lights flashing or strobing around the dark void, the surrounding general area, and so forth.

The lack of light and the production of light can be simultaneously explained with Wheeler's dielectric theory.

In dielectric theory light is the product of induction of the dielectric field and which is an incoherent counter spatial energy field all around us. On earth we are involved in the wake of the Star's interaction with the dielectric counterspatial field that produces an incoherent, or vibrational field.

This really means that photons don't exist and that what have been mistaken for photon's are incoherent dielectric rays, which is critical to understanding observed phenomena such as UFO's and other similar examples, because in some instances where a supposed alien was observed the same similar phenomena can be seen.

Someone like yourself could take the knowledge from both theories and see here the cross correlations, which in the case of so-called vibrational frequencies such as microwaves, which are cited in various patents, actually are derived from an incomplete understanding of the originating source which is producing so~called gravity.

Gravity is an acceleration, but it is an acceleration of the dielectric field towards an non-specific/incoherent point source just as a magnet itself does, and which in a magnet establishes a self cycling coherent field of dielectric rays moving about and through a center point which is itself then a counter-spatial energy point.

February 21, 2021
5:11 pm
Avatar
UAPTheory
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
January 27, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Alternative physics like this is generally bogus, I have to say. People have been sending me alternative physics from the day I published my website. Real physics already has experimental verification in very high accuracy. The correct theory of electromagnetism is quantum electrodynamics. Anything that isn't a quantum theory is immediately incorrect. The universe is essentially like a computer and deals with states, meaning it is running through states from a simple state to states of ever higher complexity. The world isn't uniform but made from information, just like the world of a video game is made from information. If you were in the game and tried to describe the world from within with smooth mathematical functions, you'd only get an approximation. The reality of that world, however, is the description of the underlying information and its relationship to each other. That is what we do in quantum field theory, and more so in quantum gravity.
Heck, I've even seen people try to explain antigravity with alternative explanations of classical electrodynamics. Such approaches are bogus and don't lead anywhere. 

March 4, 2021
2:20 pm
Avatar
gambeir
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 13, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

First off, I've been MIA because some problem with the forums. So I wasn't ignoring you. I could log on but every forum came back as an error 404, so I could see I had messages and so forth but couldn't respond.

UAP Theory, I'm sure you have had every crackpot there is send you nonsense. Of that I have no doubt. Lets look at what you wrote.

" Anything that isn't a quantum theory is immediately incorrect"

I'm glad that you at least you responded and that's about the most positive thing I can say.

You know that knowledge is not and never has been fixed UAP Theory. You know that. I don't need to remind you of that.

I'm 65 years old UAP Theory and here's what the quote "Real Physics" (once upon a time) taught me: They too said theirs was the quote "real physics" and what real physics used to say was that gravity is caused by mass which bends space+time, and in fact even today I can find all kinds of officially approved idiots who still think this correct.

All knowledge is fluid UAP Theory. Nothing is fixed. Quantum physics exists for a reason UAP Theory. It's not accidental that we now have QP as the accepted form of academic physics, but it is also not due to it being a natural succession of evolutionary thought.

Real science is applied science like the local PD uses every day. That's real science that's applied and used on a daily basis. Real science is a process, it's not mathematics which is tool, it's a methodology, a process which has to stand up to questioning.

There's no science involved in a process which refuses to be cross examined or which rejects other hypothesis, let alone when it's done by employing deceptions and derogatory terminology to further a belief in the rightness of a worng. That's not science, but it is something any experienced detective would immediately recognize.

Any science which you've just told me is so correct that any questioning of it is to be immediately disregarded, discounted, or ignored is not a science UAP Theory. That kind of unquestioning mind control works well in cults and on some weaker minds but not with me.

Please do not try to tell that you know that which is unknowable. QP is a hypothesis and not a theory. A theory is an agreed upon truth and this isn't an agreed upon anything except by those who believe as you do. We call those religions and cults have the same requirements as religious fanatics

The idea that physicists can claim to describe the Universe as a computer when these same people can't even explain a UFO or gravity with any clarity whatsoever, and always by having to resorting to biblical sized tomes filled mathematical computations, does plainly show any seasoned detective that these purported explanations for now officially acknowledged phenomena are completely bogus.

Quanatum physics has about as much chance of successfully explaining the Universe as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin have of getting a glass of ice water in hell. I'm sorry but your self inflicted blindness is overwhelming. Yes a lot of same similar cultist will agree with you. Why wouldn't they? It's what they know. I'm still waiting for a reasonable explanation for UFO's. Not that I need one but that's not anything you're interested in is it?

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 376
Currently Online: Karan
Guest(s) 33
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
greeney2: 10395
bionic: 9870
Lashmar: 5289
tigger: 4577
rath: 4297
DIss0n80r: 4162
sandra: 3859
frrostedman: 3815
Wing-Zero: 3279
Tairaa: 2842
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 26256
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 31
Topics: 9986
Posts: 126797
Newest Members:
Karan, HereButNot, Anjelka, David, tekpeck, Frank Haberland, John Wayne, niall, Leondrio Reed, Almond Flower
Administrators: John Greenewald: 700, blackvault: 1777