Wikileaks ~ US condemns leak of military documents | The War on Terrorism Homeland Security | Forum

A A A
Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Wikileaks ~ US condemns leak of military documents
Avatar
rath
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4298
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 26, 2010 - 6:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

July 27, 2010

The White House has denounced a massive leak of secret military files that allegedly describe how Pakistan's spy service aids the Afghan insurgency, but said the information was no surprise.

In all, about 92,000 documents were released by the web whistleblower Wikileaks, containing previously untold details of the Afghan war through Pentagon files and field reports from 2004 to 2010.

The New York Times, one of the first three media outlets to review and report on the leaks, said they "suggest that Pakistan, an ostensible ally of the United States, allows representatives of its spy service to meet directly with the Taliban".

Advertisement: Story continues belowBritain's Guardian newspaper said the files, many of which detail growing numbers of civilians dying at the hands of international forces as well as the Taliban, painted "a devastating portrait of the failing war in Afghanistan".

-------------------------------------------
The story behind the Afghan war-logs leaks
-------------------------------------------

The White House issued its condemnation shortly before the leaks were posted online, saying the information could endanger US lives but also pointing to the administration's long-held doubts about links between Pakistan intelligence agents and Afghan insurgents.

"The United States strongly condemns the disclosure of classified information by individuals and organisations which could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security," White House National Security Adviser James Jones said.

"These irresponsible leaks will not impact [on] our ongoing commitment to deepen our partnerships with Afghanistan and Pakistan; to defeat our common enemies; and to support the aspirations of the Afghan and Pakistani people."

The White House also released a series of remarks made in the past by top officials expressing their concern about links between Pakistan spy services and militants in Afghanistan.

Among them was one from Defence Secretary Robert Gates dated March 31, 2009: "The ISI's contacts with [extremist groups] are a real concern to us, and we have made these concerns known directly to the Pakistanis," referring to Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency.

The New York Times said it, The Guardian and the German magazine Der Spiegel, had received the leaked material several weeks ago from Wikileaks, a secretive web organisation that often publishes classified material.

The source of the leaks was unknown.

The last person suspected of providing classified material to the outlet is an American soldier who has been charged with two counts of misconduct for allegedly providing video footage of a US Apache helicopter strike in Iraq in which about a dozen people were gunned down in broad daylight.

Describing "secret strategy sessions", the Times said Pakistan spy services "organise networks of militant groups that fight against American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even hatch plots to assassinate Afghan leaders".

In one of the documents, Pakistan's former ISI spy chief Hamid Gul is described at a January 2009 meeting with a group of insurgents following the death by CIA drone attack of a leader of al-Qaeda operations in Pakistan named Zamarai, also known as Osama al-Kini.

"The meeting attendees were saddened by the news of Zamarai's death and discussed plans to complete Zamarai's last mission by facilitating the movement of a suicide vehicle-borne improvised explosive device from Pakistan to Afghanistan through the Khan Pass," it said.

The Times noted that it was unclear whether the attack ever took place, and said that, despite the official end of Gul's tenure at the ISI in 1989, "General Gul is mentioned so many times in the reports, if they are to be believed, that it seems unlikely that Pakistan's current military and intelligence officials could not know of at least some of his wide-ranging activities".

Pakistan's ambassador to the United States, Husain Haqqani, denounced the leaks, saying they consisted of "unprocessed" reports from the field that "do not reflect the current onground realities".

However, US Senator John Kerry, chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the leaks "raise serious questions about the reality of America's policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan.

"Those policies are at a critical stage and these documents may very well underscore the stakes and make the calibrations needed to get the policy right more urgent."

With nearly 150,000 US and NATO troops in Afghanistan, President Barack Obama has set a deadline of July 2011 as the start of a gradual drawdown of US troops, after a nearly nine-year mission that began in the wake of the attacks on September 11, 2001.

Mr Jones, who did not address the veracity of the information contained in the leaks, said that the documents mainly covered the time period of January 2004 to December 2009, when former president George Bush was in office.

He pointed out that Mr Obama on December 1, 2009, announced a new strategy that boosted resources for Afghanistan, and put increased focus on al-Qaeda and Taliban safe havens in Pakistan.

"This shift in strategy addressed challenges in Afghanistan that were the subject of an exhaustive policy review last fall," Mr Jones said.

A US official who asked not to be named added: "I don't think anyone who follows this issue will find it surprising that there are concerns about ISI and safe havens in Pakistan.

"Some of the disconcerting things reported are exactly why the President ordered a three-month policy review and a change in strategy," the official said, adding: "Wikileaks is not an objective news outlet but rather an organisation that opposes US policy in Afghanistan."

The Australian founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, defended publication of the material in the face of US anger. ''If journalism is good, it is controversial by its nature,'' he said.

The Australian founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, defended publication of the material in the face of US anger. ''If journalism is good, it is controversial by its nature,'' he said.

-AFP-

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 288
Currently Online: Dr. Richard Daystrom
27
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
greeney2: 10316
bionic: 9871
Lashmar: 5290
tigger: 4577
rath: 4298
DIss0n80r: 4162
sandra: 3859
frrostedman: 3816
Wing-Zero: 3279
Tairaa: 2843
Newest Members:
Jorge Alberto Blanco Gallo
Jorge Alberto Blanco Gallo
PDXPooka
Robert
Steven Joels
Cracker Jacks
Tristan Lila
Gideon Hardcastle
Rute
JacquesE
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 31
Topics: 9200
Posts: 124596

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 24971
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Administrators: John Greenewald, blackvault