Politically Censoring FOIA Requests | The Trump Administration & US Politics | Forum


Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Politically Censoring FOIA Requests
December 7, 2012
10:40 am
Forum Posts: 190
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

When President Obama first took office, one of his first acts was to tell government employees to be a lot more open in responding to Freedom of Information Act requests. The key paragraph:

The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve. In responding to requests under the FOIA, executive branch agencies (agencies) should act promptly and in a spirit of cooperation, recognizing that such agencies are servants of the public.

Unfortunately, as we've noted, the administration has quite frequently failed to live up to this promise. Last fall, we noted the particularly troubling news that Homeland Security had basically ignored the very basis of the above paragraph, and instead instituted special new processes to give FOIA requests extra political scrutiny to avoid embarrassing officials. In fact, they singled out certain groups, including the EFF, as requiring extra political scrutiny, rather than the basic scrutiny that is only supposed to make sure that classified/confidential info doesn't get out.

Amazingly, the FOIA requests that revealed this info... turn out to have been politically censored as well through that same process. The same documents have been released again -- this time without the extra redactions -- and we discover that a bunch of folks within Homeland Security were quite angry about the politicization of the FOIA process, with Chief Privacy Officer Mary Ellen Callahan, who was in charge of the FOIA process, complaining that this politicization was "CRAZY." Other emails show that DHS officials declared the politicized process to be: "meddling," "nuts" and "bananas!"

It's nice that all of this is coming out now, but it's immensely troubling that Homeland Security tried to politicize the FOIA process, and got away with it for a while as well. It's also unclear if similar politicization has taken place elsewhere in the administration. If the President really believed in that memo that he sent out when he first took office, why isn't he taking a stand against the fact that DHS specifically appeared to go against the very basis of that memo?

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201103 ... razy.shtml

Begs the question how often does this go on....more than we can imagine.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
48 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10270

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24531

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8865

Posts: 123902

Newest Members:

Dutch, Tracy, Richard Harrison, baliana, TheKingInGreen, Charles Fortune, MOS6502, Thomas C. Semeniuk, ielts, MyOpicvoid

Administrators: John Greenewald: 623, blackvault: 1776