Obama: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t | The Trump Administration & US Politics | Forum

A A A
Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Obama: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t
Avatar
SWRanger
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 281
Member Since:
August 27, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 3, 2012 - 2:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

As Americans look upon the treacherous legislation passed under NDAA 2012, it it should first be remembered that the very bill President Obama threatened to veto was controversial due to the language the Obama White House itself pressured Congress to add to the bill, according to Sen. Carl Levin.

Second, signing statements are not law, and are not a Constitutional power granted to the executive branch; any reassuring (or troubling) language within has no binding status– though it may shed light on the intent/character of the chief executive. However, the statement itself does not indicate any deviation of intent from the law as written and signed.

From Wikipedia: The Constitution does not authorize the President to use signing statements to circumvent any validly enacted Congressional Laws, nor does it authorize him to declare he will disobey such laws (or parts thereof). When a bill is presented to the President, the Constitution (Art. II) allows him only three choices: do nothing, sign the bill, or (if he disapproves of the bill) veto it in its entirety.

Obama’s use of signing statements has clearly shown his willingness to continue the George W. Bush legacy– not only of torture and illegal detainment, but in the dangerous trend of de facto rule by “executive fiat.” Worse, such signing statements put in place a precedent for future presidents to follow– or expand upon.

Further, Barack Obama has continued to backslide on his campaign promise not to use signing statements and executive orders to circumnavigate legislation signed into law. RELATED (Feb. 2010): Obama Breaks Yet Another Key Campaign Promise on Executive Orders, Signing Statements

After the legislation cleared Congress, the ACLU commented that signing the bill “will damage both his legacy and American’s reputation for upholding the rule of law,” while executive director of the Human Rights Watch blasted the President for being ‘on the wrong side of history,’ noting that “Obama will go down in history as the president who enshrined indefinite detention without trial in US law.”

Presidential candidate Ron Paul went even further, declaring that the NDAA bill begins the official establishment of martial law in the United States

NEWS LINK

We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm

Avatar
Guest
Guests
2
January 4, 2012 - 4:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I cannot believe this bill made it anywhere but in the trash bin where it belongs, much less signed by the president. I don't give a rat's ass which party you vote for or what belief system you subscribe to. This is bad for everyone, well not those in power I suppose.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 288
Currently Online:
45
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
greeney2: 10317
bionic: 9871
Lashmar: 5290
tigger: 4577
rath: 4298
DIss0n80r: 4162
sandra: 3859
frrostedman: 3816
Wing-Zero: 3279
Tairaa: 2843
Newest Members:
Rainabrainz
Jeff
Rhys Simpson
quando BORIS
Neil Linaker
ChristianWeah
9LIVES
Allie
Madeline Thom
Mark Stark
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 31
Topics: 9247
Posts: 124672

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 25008
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Administrators: John Greenewald, blackvault