Quantum Zeno Effect & Exploration of Time | Space Discussions and Theories | Forum


Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Quantum Zeno Effect & Exploration of Time
February 24, 2016
5:02 pm
Forum Posts: 3858
Member Since:
December 4, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline


There is an old saying among cocktail party physicists: “Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.” This is half true. Quantum physics doesn’t concern the tastes of insects, but it does quibble with the idea of unidirectional time. Quantum physics asserts that time is simply another dimension, meaning it can be explored like physical space. And if it can be explored, it can also not be explored. One should be able to stand perfectly still on a timeline without falling forward into the future.


That’s where the quantum Zeno Effect — a.k.a. Turing’s Paradox — comes in. Taking its name from Zeno’s arrow paradox (a moving arrow can’t actually be seen moving in any single instant, which means it’s not really moving at all), this idea basically states that if you never stop observing a particle that undergoes decay, then that particle will never decay. If that particle never decays, you’ve basically stopped it from doinganything. You’ve stopped time.


That probably doesn’t make any bit of sense if you never took advanced physics in college, so let’s take this one step at a time. The study of quantum physics is limited by the actions of the “observer” on a particular system. The most famous example of this is probably Schrödinger’s Cat, a thought experiment that illustrates the paradox inherent in quantum mechanics. You can learn more about Schrödinger and his damn cat here, but the basic conclusion is that before an observer can actually “measure” a certain system, she has to assume all outcomes are possible — and, therefore, before an observation is made, both of those outcomes exist simultaneously. They are “superimposed” on one-another.


But what happens if you are constantly observing the system? Well, if it’s the real world and not some crazy thought experiment, then the cat dies or doesn’t. But that’s not the way subatomic particles work. Multiple studies illustrate how measuring particles with increased frequency will affect the rate of decay — potentially suppressing it completely. And that’s because if you keep making measurements, there’s no time for the particles to progress into a superimposed state — they will always exist in their original, undecayed state


And if an unstable particle isn’t decaying, it’s basically frozen in time.


In a way, this demonstrates a possible way to stop time. Now, it’s nowhere near practical, of course — nobody has easy access to the type of high-tech scientific instruments you need to measure decaying atoms with such intense frequency. But the quantum Zeno effect does show that, at very, very tiny scales, you might be able to stop time. You just have to be a master at staring contests.

“Living backwards!” Alice repeated in great
astonishment. “I never heard of such a thing!”
“—but there’s one great advantage in it, that one’s
memory works both ways.”
— Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
50 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10275

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24651

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8962

Posts: 124099

Newest Members:

ifuwyg, Noctus, PRE-KNOWLEDGE 9/11- AMERICAFIRSTBILL.COM, Deezie, eureka50, wtpooh, Spud Murphy, CARSON, Sassy971, jacksdoc17

Administrators: John Greenewald: 632, blackvault: 1776