(News Articles): Over 100 Stars VANISH from The Sky, Providing Yet More Evidence of Alien Civilizations Harvesting STARS to Generate Antimatter Fuel That Can Power FTL Drives | Space Discussions and Theories | Forum

A A A
Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
(News Articles): Over 100 Stars VANISH from The Sky, Providing Yet More Evidence of Alien Civilizations Harvesting STARS to Generate Antimatter Fuel That Can Power FTL Drives
Related Tags
Avatar
Dr. Richard Daystrom
Livermore, CA.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 457
Member Since:
December 19, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 29, 2019 - 11:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Over 100 Stars VANISH from The Sky, Providing Yet More Evidence of Alien Civilizations Harvesting STARS to Generate Antimatter Fuel That Can Power FTL Drives

 

Sunday, December 29, 2019 by: Mike Adams

Tags: Alien civilizationsAliensAntimatterAstronomyCosmicExotic technologyFTL travelGalaxyMilitary technologyMilky WayOuter spaceSpeed of lightStar eatersStarsWarp bubblesWarp drivesWeapons techWeird science

(Natural News) As part of my “Oblivion Agenda” lecture series, I described how non-Earth civilizations harvest entire stars to generate antimatter fuel that powers FTL (Faster Than Light) warp drives. FTL travel is necessary to traverse the galaxy, given the enormous distances involved (even at 1000 times the speed of light, it would take 120 years to travel from one end of our Milky Way galaxy to the other).

Now, mainstream science news is writing about a bombshell discovery: Over 100 stars have vanished from the night sky in just the last 50 years. They’re literally gone. As I’ve explained in my lectures, this is because our galaxy no doubt hosts “star eaters” — advanced alien civilizations that consume entire stars to create antimatter fuel. This idea is beginning to achieve mainstream status, by the way. As CNET.com now reports:

“Unless a star directly collapses into a black hole, there is no known physical process by which it could physically vanish,” explains a new study published in the Astronomical Journal and led by Beatriz Villarroel of Stockholm University and Spain’s Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias. “The implications of finding such objects extend from traditional astrophysics fields to the more exotic searches for evidence of technologically advanced civilizations.”   

The project team believes their search for vanishing stars could be useful in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) by identifying “hot spots” in space where an unexpectedly large number of stars seem to be missing.

Zooming in on the (hot spots) in our SETI (or techno signature) searches, we can identify the most probable locations to host extra-terrestrial intelligence,” they write.

The idea here is that a very advanced alien civilization may be able to construct a hypothetical mega-structure called a Dyson sphere that completely encompasses a star in order to capture a large portion of its energy.

Here’s the image of vanishing stars. The left panel was taken in the 1950s. The right panel is from 2019. Notice how the large star in the center of the rectangle has vanished?

Importantly, these stars vanished many thousands of years ago, depending on their distance from Earth. Through normal space, light travels at a known constant speed (when gravity is not distorting space, see below), and we know the distance of these stars thanks to parallax measurements from Earth. Thus, we can easily determine how long ago these stars vanished, given that their light takes a certain amount of time to reach us.

This vanishing of stars has no explanation in mainstream astronomy, but it is explained by the existence of “star eaters” — alien civilizations that consume entire stars to power the FTL warp drives on their ships. Stars can be harvested into antimatter fuel which can then be used to project gravity distortion fields that accelerate ships to speed that far exceed the speed of light.

This is exactly what I’ve described in my Oblivion Agenda lectures, which are available at OblivionAgenda.com. I also gave a live lecture on this topic to thousands of people in Branson, Missouri, which was recorded and is available on this DVD set from GenSix Productions.

Steve Quayle himself, founder of GenSix, said this live talk was the best live presentation he’s ever seen. I continue to receive feedback from people saying it changed their entire view of reality.

Yes, the speed of light can be radically altered by bending the space through which light travels

Naturally, people who think they know a little something about physics will immediately scream, “But the speed of light cannot be exceeded! It is an absolute limit!”

That’s not true at all. The speed of light is limited according to the spacetime “grid” through which light is passing, so if that grid is stretched via projected gravity fields, then light itself can more quickly traverse that grid. In other words, if you bend spacetime by a factor of 10, stretching it out to where the “grid” of space is now ten times more elongated, then light can appear to travel at ten times the “speed of light” to an outside observer, even though within the grid itself, the speed of light is still constant compared to the grid.

Put another way, the speed of light varies according to the distortion of space by gravity, which is why the observed speed of light by scientists all around the world is not a constant. Small variations in the speed of light have been routinely observed literally thousands of times by dozens of different labs around the world. These speed variations are due to gravity waves washing over our planet, causing variations in the curvature of space itself (which is how gravity works, of course).

In fact, variations in the observed speed of light are so common that the scientific community had to cheat to fix the speed of light to a constant. They did this through circular logic, by defining the speed of light as a component of how long it takes light to travel one meter, while defining one meter as the distance traversed by light in a given amount of time. These definitions are circular, which is why the speed of light is a “constant,” even when it isn’t in reality. (This is just one way the scientific community deceives the world with fake science and fake math. It’s more common than you might suppose…)

I don’t have the space here to do a full science paper on this for those who are still stuck in Newtonian physics, but the simple explanation is that gravity not only bends light, but gravity bends the space through which light travels. If you didn’t know that gravity bends the space through which light travels, then you aren’t even up to speed on the most basic astrophysics principles used by mainstream university lab all around the world. Yes, gravity bends light indirectly, by bending the space through which light travels, and that explains why large masses such as stars, black holes and planets, create a “lensing effect,” bending the light of stars that travels near those masses as the light makes its way to Earth. This is why stars appear to shift around the perimeter of the sun as observed during a total eclipse.

So the key to traveling faster than the speed of light is found in bending space, not accelerating in standard space. You can never accelerate to the speed of light in standard space, because there isn’t enough energy in the universe to achieve that goal. But you can, if you have the tech, bend space itself by projecting strong gravity fields that distort spacetime. An entire ship can then be propelled to speeds in excess of 1000 times the speed of light by traversing this space distortion, which can be projected as a spheric bubble around a spacecraft.

Projecting gravity fields, as you might suspect, requires enormous amounts of energy. The kind of energy that would have to be harvested from entire stars.

From my Oblivion Agenda slides, I explain why FTL technology is commonplace in the cosmos:

This slide explains how NASA-linked scientists are well aware that FTL travel can be achieved by projecting gravity fields using high density fuel such as antimatter:

I actually covered much of this in yesterday’s feature article which explains why Flat Earthers don’t understand gravity. From that article:

This isn’t science fiction, by the way. It’s a serious subject that’s being studied by serious scientists connected with NASA as a form of future space flight. It turns out you actually can travel faster than light by bending space using antimatter, which means you aren’t violating the absolute speed limit of light, even as you are moving from point A to point B at a velocity that would appear to be faster than light to a stationary observer.

This is the subject of study of a NASA-linked project called “Project Eagleworks,” and here’s a video of Harold “Sonny” White from Eagleworks laboratories, explaining his ongoing research into this exotic “advanced propulsion” technology:

As I mention on OblivionAgenda.com, alien spacecraft can appear to “teleport” by applying a 100 x C (100 times the speed of light) spacetime warp bubble for one microsecond (one millionth of a second), which would propel a craft 30 km faster than the blink of a human eye. Importantly, the occupants of the craft would feel nothing.

Harold White is the same scientist, by the way, who has calculated that warp bubbles which achieve 10 x C (ten times the speed of light) could be achieved using the energy found in 200 kg of antimatter fuel. See his research summary document here, which explains:

Additionally, the lab is implementing a warp field interferometer that will be able to measure spacetime disturbances down to 150nm. Recent work published by White [1] [2] [3] suggests that it may be possible to engineer spacetime creating conditions similar to what drives the expansion of the cosmos. Although the expected magnitude of the effect would be tiny, it may be a “Chicago pile” moment for this area of physics.

Similarly, the Tauri Group is working with NASA and says antimatter propulsion systems may only be 50 – 60 years away.

There are many fascinating areas of research to consider in all this, and I’ve lectured about many of them at OblivionAgenda.com. For example, I’ve proposed that gravity wave detectors could be placed on the moon and used to detect visitations from alien craft which are using projected warp bubbles, since any disturbance in the gravity warping of spacetime ripples out at the speed of light and can be detected by ordinary sensors. This is how Earth can easily detect when non-Earth civilizations are using warp bubble drives anywhere near our solar system. (My guess is that NASA already has these sensors on the moon and is already well aware of all this.)

Additionally, I’ve proposed ideas on harvesting pulsars and magnetars to produce antimatter fuel which would be necessary to power warp bubble projection systems. This also explains the economics of the cosmos and why pulsars and similar collapsed stars are so valuable as the “cosmic oil wells” for intragalactic travel.

Why alien civilizations need to consume entire stars to power their cosmic conquest

Notice that in the passage above, I was talking about “star eater” operations, where entire stars (pulsars, magnetars, etc.) are consumed in the production of antimatter fuel to power spacecraft at speeds vastly exceeding the speed of light.

Here’s the slide from my presentation that talks about intergalactic travel and why the vast distances are so great that even traveling at 1000 times the speed of light would take 25 years just to reach the nearest neighbor galaxy:

This is why traveling from one galaxy to another in any practical way would require travel speeds of 10,000 or even 100,000 times the speed of light. Projecting such strong gravity distortions would require the energy of entire stars, perhaps requiring one star to be consumed for a single trip to a neighboring galaxy at 100,000 times the speed of light.

This may explain why the stars are vanishing at an alarming rate. In fact, it’s the best explanation for why stars are vanishing from the night sky. Alien civilizations are literally consuming them as energy sources, or what I call “cosmic oil wells” in my Oblivion Agenda presentation.

Antimatter fuel and how it’s created

One of the subjects I cover in my lecture is how antimatter fuel is created. This exotic substance has already been created on Earth. Scientific American explains antimatter at this link.

Antimatter is spontaneously generated in storm clouds in the atmosphere, by the way. Positrons (positively charged electrons, which are one form of antimatter) can also originate with the decay of potassium-40, which is found inside our own bodies. (Yes, your body is generating very small amounts of antimatter, too.)

When synthesizing antimatter — and this is crucial to understand — it currently requires 1 billion times more energy to make antimatter than can be released by it, using Earth technology. Imagine charging a battery but having to expend one billion times more watts of power than the battery can ever release. That’s the inefficiency currently found in antimatter generation. If alien civilizations can improve the efficiency of this process by a million times, it would still require one thousand times more energy to make antimatter than is released by it.

In other words, synthesizing antimatter requires enormous amounts of energy — the scale of energy that must be harvested from stars.

Here’s my slide about antimatter, from the OblivionAgenda.com lecture:

Once this antimatter is created, it can be physically stored in “fuel cells” which are transported and distributed to the spacecraft that consume them to project gravity fields that distort spacetime (and thereby achieved FTL travel).

The amount of energy required to distort spacetime is not linear

Now, a person who doesn’t understand the nature of reality might think that distorting spacetime by a factor of 100 would require only ten times more energy than distorting spacetime by a factor of 10. However, the energy expenditures are not linear.

Although we don’t yet know the exact shape of the energy expenditure curve, I’m going to take an educated guess and propose that the amount of energy required to distort spacetime has a squared relationship with the severity of the distortion. In other words, distorting the spacetime field by a factor of 100 would require 100 times the energy as distorting it by a factor of 10. That’s because 10 squared is 100.

And if you needed to travel at 1000 times the speed of light, that would require ten thousand times more energy than traveling at 10 times the speed of light.

This energy must be constantly expended for the full duration of the journey in order to maintain the gravity distortion around the ship. The moment the energy expenditure stops, the “shape” of spacetime collapses back to normal space, and your travel speed collapses back to normal velocities.

This same relationship, by the way, is found throughout physics, such as the inverse square rule of radiation exposure vs. distance from the source. Nature loves squared relationships.

This should not be an odd idea, given that even here on Earth, flying airplanes at very fast speeds — such as supersonic speeds — requires far more energy than flying at subsonic speeds. In fact, the current speeds achieved by commercial airliners such as Boeing jets is determined entirely by fuel efficiency, not maximum achievable speeds. Yes, engineers at Boeing can build planes that fly at Mach 2, for example, but the fuel expenditures are more than ten times greater than the fuel expended at 450 mph, which is roughly the current commercial air travel speed used across the industry.

If you want to go fast, in other words, it’s going to cost you dearly. And the same is true on a cosmic scale, too. Traveling at just the speed of light itself, by the way, is no doubt considered “slow” by cosmic travel standards. Even 100 times the speed of light is painstakingly slow, given the extreme distances between stars even in our own galaxy. Don’t forget that Earth is 27,000 light years away from the center of our own galaxy. That’s 270 years in a spacecraft if you’re traveling at 100 times the speed of light, and you haven’t even left your home galaxy yet.

Stars are fuel stations for any civilization willing to destroy them along its path of travel

Advanced alien civilizations could travel at perhaps 1000 or 10,000 times the speed of light as long as they could consume stars along the way, transforming entire stars into antimatter energy to power their warp bubble drives (gravity projection systems).

Naturally, this also means destroying the entire local star system in the process, causing orbiting planets to descend into freezing cold lifelessness.

But think about it: If humans had the ability to turn entire stars into energy, do you really think any sense of morality or ethics would stop humanity from destroying anything in its path of conquest and riches? Human greed tells you everything you need to know about this issue. Conquering alien civilizations have zero respect for other life forms, and they will destroy anything required to achieve their goals of territory expansion and resource capture.

What, did you think greed was only limited to humans? Just thank God humanity hasn’t yet figured out how to eat stars, or we might just eat our own in order to prop of the stock price of the latest Elon Musk delusion.

Here’s Episode 5 of the Oblivion Agenda lecture series. It covers more discussions on FTL travel and why it’s commonplace in the cosmos:

We now have physical evidence that aliens are consuming stars in our own galaxy

The upshot of all this is that we now have physical evidence that aliens are consuming entire stars in our own galaxy. Of course, the establishment astrophysics community is forced to downplay any possibility of little green men. Via CNET:

“But we are clear that none of these events have shown any direct signs of being ETI,” says co-author Martin López Corredoira in a statement. “We believe that they are natural, if somewhat extreme, astrophysical sources.”

In other words, Corredoira is saying that stars are vanishing for reasons that astrophysicists can’t yet explain. Yet we already have an explanation that makes perfect sense: They’re being harvested as energy sources by alien civilizations that are using the energy to power FTL travel as part of their conquest, colonization and strategic dominance of the real estate of our galaxy.

Given the average lifetime of a star — billions of years — it is statistically impossible for 100 prominent stars to vanish from our night sky in just 50 years. And those are merely the stars they’ve noticed. At this rate, we’re talking about 2 stars per Earth year, and the real number is likely much higher… perhaps 20 stars per year.

Has anybody wondered whether our own sun might be the next start to be harvested by a dominant civilization that sees us as little more than “stupid apes” who inhabit a planet that we’ve already half destroyed?

Get informed and upgrade your knowledge about cosmic reality. Watch my lectures at OblivionAgenda.com.

You can also hear more of my podcasts at the H.R. Report channel on Brighteon.com.

We also cover astronomy and space exploration at Space.news.

W. O. Belfield, Jr.

Avatar
Straight Zeke the Geek
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 49
Member Since:
December 3, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 30, 2019 - 6:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

You offer a lot in this threadpost so I'm going to address only a couple things. They say in this article that the only known source of a dissapearing star that scientists have confirmed knowledge of is when a black hole swallows a star. Whose to say that all of those missing stars werent swallowed by black holes? 70 years is a millisecond in space-time. Perhaps whatever known techniques there exist to detect the prescence of black holes arent able to detect that these missing stars were eaten by them because it is too soon for the detectable effects of a black hole to reach earth. Light is moving towards us from these stars. Black holes pull light inwards. I am guessing that all of those stars are eaten by black holes.

 

Another thing that gets me is the misunderstanding of bending space-time to travel beyond the speed of light. Truthfully, you arent really travelling any faster and thus you havent exceeded light speed, youve bent the ground into hills that touch at the top and you skip across them at your same speed. To an observer you would appear and then disappear and to the next observer 100 light years away youve appeared and disappeared yet again but only a minute after your first observer, yet you havent changed speed from your perspective.

There's a time in every man's life when has to make tough choices.

Avatar
Straight Zeke the Geek
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 49
Member Since:
December 3, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 30, 2019 - 9:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I should add that what I explained was the popular oversimplified 2D version of interstellar travel, if it were possible. In all actuality were you able to do so you wouldn't be making grand leaps of 100 light years per minute. Such travel would be on a much smaller wavelength and make your craft blur in and out of reality depending on what frequency traveling this way forces your craft into. To an observer you might appear translucent or blurry or fully invisible altogether. In a 3D model your travel path might resemble more of a stretched hole, much in the way a black hole turns matter into elongated strings.

The "leaps" through space would be far more numerous than I described in my last post and possibly would be plotted on a trajectory and fed into your craft as a series of engine commands much like oversized air craft carriers are programmed. Not much room for manual steering. I could be wrong about that part but for us humans here on earth that is likely how our navigation systems on such a craft would be built in development.  The acceptable margin for error in a craft that travels that distance would be absolutely none. The slightest mistake and your crew would be doomed.

There's a time in every man's life when has to make tough choices.

Avatar
Dr. Richard Daystrom
Livermore, CA.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 457
Member Since:
December 19, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 30, 2019 - 10:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Why does a  unusual observation such as stars vanishing have to have only one solution or explanation? I am amazed that astronomers or  physicists who typically do not stray from inside the "box", have left the "box" completely to suggest that Aliens have such technology as to harvest energy from the sun.

This is a "huge" step in understanding the complexity of the universe. I am a believer of Occam's Razor the principle that says when something happens that can be explained in multiple ways, the simplest explanation is usually the right one. One must keep in mind that the simpler explanation doesn't necessarily mean the one that's easier to explain. Rather, it means the one with fewer moving parts: fewer variables in the equation, fewer types of abstract ideas, or fewer guesses. 

Let's say that there are Aliens who can harvest the energy of the stars this would shake our belief that we humans our smart. Like Mike Adams says we humans are smart enough to make nuclear weapons and dumb enough to use them! When I read this article I came away with the feeling of how "puny" we humans are.

Currently I am writing a paper tentatively titled "Science Presents A Theory for The Existence of Reptoid's on Earth." I am using the science that I have been taught in school to explain that there was an advanced sentient being before humans. I also go as far as to make a case for "shapeshifting." I believe a lot of people will find this paper very disturbing. So much incredible information has been kept from the people for such a long time.

In conclusion the point I am trying to make is that we should always keep an open mind to all possibilities even though they may go against a particular paradigm we hold so near and dear. 

W. O. Belfield, Jr.

Avatar
Conspiracy Theorist
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
January 2, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 2, 2020 - 7:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I love your work! It's fantastic great job

I just signed up for blackvault this site is awesome

I look forward to your new paper on repoid's on earth!

Avatar
Straight Zeke the Geek
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 49
Member Since:
December 3, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 2, 2020 - 12:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Dr. Richard Daystrom said
Why does a  unusual observation such as stars vanishing have to have only one solution or explanation? I am amazed that astronomers or  physicists who typically do not stray from inside the "box", have left the "box" completely to suggest that Aliens have such technology as to harvest energy from the sun.

This is a "huge" step in understanding the complexity of the universe. I am a believer of Occam's Razor the principle that says when something happens that can be explained in multiple ways, the simplest explanation is usually the right one. One must keep in mind that the simpler explanation doesn't necessarily mean the one that's easier to explain. Rather, it means the one with fewer moving parts: fewer variables in the equation, fewer types of abstract ideas, or fewer guesses. 

Let's say that there are Aliens who can harvest the energy of the stars this would shake our belief that we humans our smart. Like Mike Adams says we humans are smart enough to make nuclear weapons and dumb enough to use them! When I read this article I came away with the feeling of how "puny" we humans are.

Currently I am writing a paper tentatively titled "Science Presents A Theory for The Existence of Reptoid's on Earth." I am using the science that I have been taught in school to explain that there was an advanced sentient being before humans. I also go as far as to make a case for "shapeshifting." I believe a lot of people will find this paper very disturbing. So much incredible information has been kept from the people for such a long time.

In conclusion the point I am trying to make is that we should always keep an open mind to all possibilities even though they may go against a particular paradigm we hold so near and dear. 

  

Imagine the amount of time it would take to completely block a stars light, a lot more than 70 years. The sheer amount of matter required is enormous and would take something like 50 saturns and jupiter's.

Black holes make sense in this scenario and truth is although space is unimaginably vast and limitless it is also awfully simple and predictable. New discoveries are few and far between. With astronomy in particular using what knowledge there exists to explain new phenomenon is usually the more accurate route.

You're also right though, who is to say that some outrageously advanced alien specie hasn't got the power to make a sun blink out of existence or change into another dimension and frequency of existence? I say its totally possible. But it will be another 100 years before the technology will exist that will monitor the skies more continuously and accurately for longer periods of time rather than 70 years between two photos.

You should also remember that stars arent the only sources of light in the universe and it is possible that some of those objects werent stars. Also, remember that a star is a tiny pinpoint of light and the closer you get to us the smaller the object needs to be to block the light. It could be that all those stars were blocked by Solar System asteroids at the precise moment of the pictures.

There's a time in every man's life when has to make tough choices.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 332
Currently Online:
74
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
greeney2: 10327
bionic: 9871
Lashmar: 5290
tigger: 4577
rath: 4298
DIss0n80r: 4162
sandra: 3859
frrostedman: 3816
Wing-Zero: 3279
Tairaa: 2843
Newest Members:
ugacenupi
Amelia1412
Texas Tom
Ben
Random Citizen
Leigh
Woodsavage
rose rita
THarefo
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 31
Topics: 9414
Posts: 125050

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 25179
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Administrators: John Greenewald, blackvault