Science...very confusing. | Scientific Discoveries and Advancements | Forum


Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Science...very confusing.
November 6, 2011
6:54 am
Forum Posts: 239
Member Since:
July 26, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Does Science ever confuse you?

It does me. In 2009 I remember reading:

"Neanderthals 'distinct from us'
By James Morgan
Science reporter, BBC News, Chicago

The DNA will tease out the differences between Neanderthals (l) and us (r)
Scientists studying the DNA of Neanderthals say they can find no evidence that this ancient species ever interbred with modern humans.

But our evolutionary cousins may well have been able to speak as well as us, said Prof Svante Paabo from Germany's Max Planck Institute."

THEN...just a year later I am reading:

"Neanderthal DNA Found In Human DNA: Human Ancestors Mated With Extinct Species, Researchers Say."
see ... 67177.html

And I'm, like, make up your MIND! It's Grandparents Day and I gotta pick out a Greeting Card.

And NOW comes "DNA identifies new ancient human dubbed 'X-woman'
By Paul Rincon
Science reporter, BBC News

The finger bone was unearthed in 2008 at Denisova Cave
Scientists have identified a previously unknown type of ancient human through analysis of DNA from a finger bone unearthed in a Siberian cave."

A PREVIOUSLY unknown THIRD ancestor NOT Homo-sapiens, NOT Cro-Mag, NOT Neanderthal????

Good Grief? Could she be teh Sasquatch's Grandma?

(Always assuming there ARE Sasquatches, of course.)

But see

And what about Australopithecus sediba ? Australopithecus, you'll remember, was discovered in EAST Africa which is why they called it "Southern Ape".

But what about Australopithecus Sediba? Australopithecus sediba is a Southern Ape from SOUTH Africa :"Researchers tell the journal Science that the creatures fill an important gap between older hominids and the group of more modern species known as Homo, which includes our own kind. "

(At this point, Michelle Bachmann, Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson, et al would like it known that there ain't no "Homo" in THEIR family trees.)

"The team has assigned the name Australopithecus sediba to their finds.

"It's at the point where we transition from an ape that walks on two legs to, effectively, us," lead scientist Professor Lee Berger of the University of the Witwatersrand told BBC News.

"I think that probably everyone is aware that this period of time - that period between 1.8 and just over two million years [ago] - is one of the most poorly represented in the entire early hominid fossil record. You're talking about a very small, very fragmentary record," he explained.


But here's the question I want answered.
Was this show I used to watch a DOCUMENTARY show or NOT??

December 26, 2011
10:55 am

It's not the science that confuses me, it's the scientists.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
56 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10273

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24597

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8922

Posts: 124025

Newest Members:

Frankie, Puggo, Ken, Rosco Jones, herpeseraser, Troy, Aurora, Harry, troglor, Blue Moon

Administrators: John Greenewald: 629, blackvault: 1776