Science...very confusing. | Scientific Discoveries and Advancements | Forum

Please consider registering
Forum Scope


Forum Options

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Science...very confusing.
Forum Posts: 240
Member Since:
July 26, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
November 6, 2011 - 6:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Does Science ever confuse you?

It does me. In 2009 I remember reading:

"Neanderthals 'distinct from us'
By James Morgan
Science reporter, BBC News, Chicago

The DNA will tease out the differences between Neanderthals (l) and us (r)
Scientists studying the DNA of Neanderthals say they can find no evidence that this ancient species ever interbred with modern humans.

But our evolutionary cousins may well have been able to speak as well as us, said Prof Svante Paabo from Germany's Max Planck Institute."

THEN...just a year later I am reading:

"Neanderthal DNA Found In Human DNA: Human Ancestors Mated With Extinct Species, Researchers Say."
see ... 67177.html

And I'm, like, make up your MIND! It's Grandparents Day and I gotta pick out a Greeting Card.

And NOW comes "DNA identifies new ancient human dubbed 'X-woman'
By Paul Rincon
Science reporter, BBC News

The finger bone was unearthed in 2008 at Denisova Cave
Scientists have identified a previously unknown type of ancient human through analysis of DNA from a finger bone unearthed in a Siberian cave."

A PREVIOUSLY unknown THIRD ancestor NOT Homo-sapiens, NOT Cro-Mag, NOT Neanderthal????

Good Grief? Could she be teh Sasquatch's Grandma?

(Always assuming there ARE Sasquatches, of course.)

But see

And what about Australopithecus sediba ? Australopithecus, you'll remember, was discovered in EAST Africa which is why they called it "Southern Ape".

But what about Australopithecus Sediba? Australopithecus sediba is a Southern Ape from SOUTH Africa :"Researchers tell the journal Science that the creatures fill an important gap between older hominids and the group of more modern species known as Homo, which includes our own kind. "

(At this point, Michelle Bachmann, Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson, et al would like it known that there ain't no "Homo" in THEIR family trees.)

"The team has assigned the name Australopithecus sediba to their finds.

"It's at the point where we transition from an ape that walks on two legs to, effectively, us," lead scientist Professor Lee Berger of the University of the Witwatersrand told BBC News.

"I think that probably everyone is aware that this period of time - that period between 1.8 and just over two million years [ago] - is one of the most poorly represented in the entire early hominid fossil record. You're talking about a very small, very fragmentary record," he explained.


But here's the question I want answered.
Was this show I used to watch a DOCUMENTARY show or NOT??

December 26, 2011 - 10:55 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It's not the science that confuses me, it's the scientists.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 332
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 38
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
greeney2: 10343
bionic: 9871
Lashmar: 5290
tigger: 4577
rath: 4298
DIss0n80r: 4162
sandra: 3859
frrostedman: 3816
Wing-Zero: 3279
Tairaa: 2843
Newest Members:
thanh thủy
Lilianaus Elushia Vessus
Michael E. Boyd
James Smith
Meo Bong
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 31
Topics: 9555
Posts: 125523


Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 25390
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Administrators: John Greenewald, blackvault