New Study; Nearly Every Species Dates Back Just 100,000 to 200,000 Years, | Scientific Discoveries and Advancements | Forum

A A A
Avatar
Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log In
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Related Related Topics sp_TopicIcon
New Study; Nearly Every Species Dates Back Just 100,000 to 200,000 Years,
June 18, 2018
4:31 pm
Avatar
Jamie
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 429
Member Since:
February 2, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Great post, it raises so many questions.

Was it the beginning200,000 yrs ago, or a restart? Where did they get the material to start from? A small sample found here? Or taken from the creater itself? Making all life created, almost the same age? Means a lot of planning and forethought. Wow, amazing to think about.:-)

It's better to walk alone, than with a crowd going in the wrong direction. H.S.

July 9, 2018
1:52 pm
Avatar
JT
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 19
Member Since:
July 4, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

If true, then intelligent design becomes a viable mainstream alternative again.  What is old is now new.  There always seems to be a giant blind spot in the world of science, I think Einstein was right when he suggested all theories man creates would eventually be proven false.  Some thing we are good at, is creating beautiful falsehoods.

July 11, 2018
10:03 am
Avatar
JT
Member
Members
Level 0
Forum Posts: 19
Member Since:
July 4, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I like the term: Alternative Knowledge.  At the very least it points to a clue about this reality we inhabit, that there is always more than one way to look at things even if you must step outside accepted paradigms, meme's and consensus.  You even defined your own perception in a more acceptable and flexible way: "I am a firm believer of..."

It is one of the weapons those who's lives and livelyhoods exists in the Consensus, use against us.

They are always trying to smack us over the head with their "proofs" and years of data collection to prove their theories, but when confronted with someone who "firmly believes" in their own perception, often based on Alternative Knowledge, they have no real way of dialoging.  They simply say we are incorrect at best, worst... well I'm sure you've been called many things for your beliefs. Wink

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 376
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 50
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
greeney2: 10396
bionic: 9870
Lashmar: 5289
tigger: 4577
rath: 4297
DIss0n80r: 4162
sandra: 3859
frrostedman: 3815
Wing-Zero: 3279
Tairaa: 2842
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 25780
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 31
Topics: 9873
Posts: 126484
Newest Members:
John Greenewald, letty shawn, Jacob, Bridge City13, Finn Knetes, William C. Lane, Broghen Anders, jisco43, Rina Jakkierston, Cyruz da King
Administrators: John Greenewald: 696, blackvault: 1777