(Opinion): California Moves to Let Felons Serve on Juries. | Racial and Religious Discrimination / Stereotyping | Forum

A A A
Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
(Opinion): California Moves to Let Felons Serve on Juries.
Avatar
Dr. Richard Daystrom
Livermore, CA.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 362
Member Since:
December 19, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 14, 2019 - 12:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Opinion

California Moves to Let Felons Serve on Juries.

 

By JOHN PHILLIPS | Orange County Register

PUBLISHED: June 13, 2019 at 11:41 am | UPDATED: June 13, 2019 at 11:42 am

The state of California has made no secret that it wants to let as many people out of prison as possible. From the early release of inmates through AB 109, to filling parole boards with felon friendly commissioners, to decriminalizing a litany of felonies and drug offenses with Props 47 and 57, Sacramento lawmakers are bending over backwards to dramatically reduce the state’s inmate population.

Despite all of these efforts, the number of inmates hasn’t dropped dramatically enough to satisfy the state’s ruling Democrats, so they’re kicking tires on a new approach — rigging the jury system so no one gets convicted in the first place.

This most recent push is Senate Bill 310, authored by state Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, and would allow Californians who have prior felony convictions to serve on juries.

In a press release promoting the proposal, Skinner wrote, “SB310 will help ensure that California juries represent a fair cross-section of our communities…People with felony records have the right to vote in California. There is no legitimate reason why they should be barred from serving on a jury.”

Currently, felons are prevented from serving on juries because of their obvious and inherent bias against prosecutors and law enforcement.

If you honestly believe that jurors in California who’ve served time won’t be more lenient towards accused criminals, I’ve got a bullet train to sell you.

People who have a family member in law enforcement are excused from jury duty all the time because of the possibility of bias, even unconscious bias.

How can someone who’s served time be considered free of bias?

That’s like having crazy cat ladies vote on how many cats a person should own.

It should be noted that SB310 makes no distinction between violent and non-violent offenders, and even allows convicted felons who are still on probation or parole to serve.

Imagine serving your time, getting out of the clink, then getting sentenced to six months of jury duty on an insurance fraud case.  Haven’t you paid your debt to society already?

Since this is California, and the idea is cartoonishly preposterous, of course it sailed through the Senate Public Safety Committee on a 5-1 vote.

In testimony to the Committee, Brendon Woods, Alameda County’s Public Defender, noted that defendants of color are often faced with juries in California in which “no one who sits in judgment looks like [them].”

In California it’s already illegal to exclude potential jurors because of their race, national origin or gender, among other categories.  A “jury of your peers” doesn’t mean having a foreman with the same ankle monitoring device as the defendant.

RELATED ARTICLES:

  1. California’s high-speed rail is the very definition of a boondoggle
  2. Sacramento’s way of evading transparency and accountability
  3. As debt rises, presidential candidates only want to spend more
  4. OC should implement minor fix to rash of inmate deaths
  5. Seize the moment to fix horse racing at Santa Anita and everywhere else

Since the Senate Public Safety Committee vote, SB310 has since been approved by the full state Senate. It was approved on a 27-10 vote.

Look, I’m willing to compromise on this.  If an ex-con wants to judge a wet T-shirt contest I say go for it.  But felonies are serious business, and the public deserves honest trials with juries who will evaluate the evidence with as few biases as possible, and vote accordingly.

More importantly, that’s what victims deserve as well.

Plus, I’m just not willing to risk having a juror whose vote on guilt or innocence might be swayed by a carton of Marlboro Reds.

Could you imagine turning the news on one night and hearing the phrase:  “Mr. Cosby, have you and your fellow jurors reached a verdict?”

Make no mistake, SB310 is not about expanding civil rights for persecuted minorities or reintegrating felons into society — it’s about stacking the deck against prosecutors by making it impossible to win criminal convictions.

John Phillips can be heard weekdays at 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. on “The Morning Drive with John Phillips and Jillian Barberie” on KABC/AM 790.

Get out of your bubble!

W. O. Belfield, Jr.

Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10318
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 20, 2019 - 9:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Do you nhave an opinion or just copy and pasting? good topic if you want to actually talk about it. 

Avatar
Dr. Richard Daystrom
Livermore, CA.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 362
Member Since:
December 19, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 23, 2019 - 2:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I'am a voracious reader. I like to post articles that would never see the time of day in the MSM. In my opinion this is definitely a backward step in the philosophy of jurisprudence. 

W. O. Belfield, Jr.

Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10318
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 23, 2019 - 2:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

While I agree, it begs the question if a sentence is completed do we assume rehabilitation? Most go back to bad lives but many do straighten out. California would let illegals vote if they could, let felons out of prison early, and now want them deciding criminal cases.i doubt they can be impartial. California liberalism is pretty stupid sometimes. 

Avatar
Dr. Richard Daystrom
Livermore, CA.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 362
Member Since:
December 19, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 23, 2019 - 5:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have no idea if people realize this or not, the typical politician no longer has roots in middle class Americana. Most of the politicians come from wealth. It is highly unlikely you will ever see a Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein or Kamala Harris shopping at a Walmart. They don't even live in residential neighborhoods. These people have a totally different sense of reality from you and I. This is why they create these weird ideas of having felons on Juries. They're out of touch!

I live in the San Francisco Bay Area. It was never brought out during California's Governor election that Gavin Newsome had a cocaine problem.  When he was Mayor of San Francisco. During his cocaine addiction he was having sexual relations with his political managers wife., while his political manager was still working for Gavin Newsome. To me this tells me something about the character of this man.

The point I am trying to make is that a lot of the politicians who are authoring strange or bizarre legislation are people with real serious issues. These are not well-adjusted individuals, perhaps in some ways they are a reflection of our society.

W. O. Belfield, Jr.

Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10318
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 24, 2019 - 9:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Their focus is not on Californians, their focus is on letting illegals get away with murder, making us a sanctuary state, with sanctuary cities, while homeless are all over the city, and drugs are rampant. The rich can pay for everything according to democrats, and the President is treated like the enemy of the people by our dimwitt Governors, Brown and Newsome.  When Trump lost this state, they ignore that more than the popular vote he did not get nationally, was easily made up with Republican votes in our state, the the electoral vote is winner take all. Our votes did not count, and the republican voters in California Are much bigger than many states. 

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 288
Currently Online:
48
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
greeney2: 10318
bionic: 9871
Lashmar: 5290
tigger: 4577
rath: 4298
DIss0n80r: 4162
sandra: 3859
frrostedman: 3816
Wing-Zero: 3279
Tairaa: 2843
Newest Members:
Bodson
Lorenzo
Free Love Problem Solution
walterskinner
Warren Cosford
Jurriaan Maessen
Danny
Sam
Jimbo
Lee
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 31
Topics: 9266
Posts: 124718

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 25033
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Administrators: John Greenewald, blackvault