(News Article):Instead of red flag laws, why won’t lawmakers investigate psychiatric drugs and their links to violence? | Questions that make you think... | Forum

Please consider registering
sp_LogInOut Log In
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Forum Options

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Related Related Topics sp_TopicIcon
(News Article):Instead of red flag laws, why won’t lawmakers investigate psychiatric drugs and their links to violence?
August 15, 2019
3:36 pm
Richard Daystrom PhD
Livermore, CA.
Level 1
Forum Posts: 740
Member Since:
December 19, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Instead of red flag laws, why won’t lawmakers investigate psychiatric drugs and their links to violence?

Thursday, August 15, 2019 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: Big PharmaDangerous Medicinedrug cartelsfirearmsgun rightsgun violencegunsLawmakersmass shootingspsych drugspsychiatric drugspsychiatryred flag lawsSecond Amendmentviolence

(Ntrl. Nws) As we’ve come to expect, “RINOs” (Republicans in name only) like Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina are now eagerly pushing the so-called “red flag” laws that Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner want to see implemented all across the country as an affront to the Second Amendment. But why is nothing being said about the role that psychiatric pharmaceuticals like SSRIs (selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors) quite obviously play in America’s mass shootings?

As we’ve reported time and time again, the one thing that every alleged mass shooting has in common is that the supposed shooters had all been taking mind-altering pharmaceuticals in the lead up to their killing sprees. And yet, we never hear Congress calling for common-sense pharma pill control.

No matter what conservatives try to do in an attempt to assuage the gun-grabbing left, the fact of the matter is that the left will always hate conservatives. So why not stop pandering to them, and instead address the obvious elephant in the room, known as Big Pharma.

“The overwhelming evidence points to the single largest common factor in all of these incidents is the fact that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs or had been at some point in the immediate past before they committed their crimes,” writes Dan Roberts for Ammoland.com.

“Multiple credible scientific studies going back more than a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs … have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior.”

.Guns don’t kill people; PEOPLE kill people – and usually people who kill people are taking legal Big Pharma drugs

Besides the fact that, in and of themselves, pharma drugs kill far more people every single day than gun violence, the impact of this pharmakeia sorcery on users’ brains is causing many of them to turn certifiably crazy. And every so often, some of these pharma-induced “dead heads” decide to go on a shooting spree, to which the brainwashed left always and unilaterally responds with calls for the abolishment of the Second Amendment – even though the actual culprits are these pharma pills, which are sold by legal drug dealers at the millions of CVS, Walgreens, and Rite-Aid “dispensaries” that dot the American landscape.

It’s a horrific epidemic that never gets addressed by the mainstream media. Only on sites like Natural News, which are now banned from most social media and tech platforms, will you ever hear about the link between pharma drugs and mass shootings, as all of the “verified” and “approved” media outlets continue to blame guns.

Sadly, many Americans would seem to already be too drugged out themselves to recognize the truth. Between their pharmaceutical stockpiles; fluoride in the drinking water supply; and chemicals in the food supply, a large segment of the country is now so brain-damaged that they actually think guns are the problem – which certainly bodes ominous for the future of our once-great republic.

“Those focusing on further firearms bans or magazine restrictions are clearly focusing on the wrong issue and asking the wrong questions, either as a deliberate attempt to hide these links, or out of complete and utter ignorance,” Roberts contends.

“Don’t let them! Force our elected ‘representatives’ and the media to cast a harsh spotlight on this issue. Don’t stop hounding them until they do.”

To learn more about the Second Amendment and why it must always be non-negotiable, regardless of what the “news” claims is happening in the world, be sure to check out SecondAmendment.news.

Sources for this article include:




W. O. Belfield, Jr.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles
Most Users Ever Online: 376
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 47
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
greeney2: 10396
bionic: 9870
Lashmar: 5289
tigger: 4577
rath: 4297
DIss0n80r: 4162
sandra: 3859
frrostedman: 3815
Wing-Zero: 3279
Tairaa: 2842
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 25785
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 8
Forums: 31
Topics: 9875
Posts: 126488
Newest Members:
Freddy Nation, GeneralMalfunction, Black Cover, Deacon, Don Portnoy, John Greenewald, letty shawn, Jacob, Bridge City13, Finn Knetes
Administrators: John Greenewald: 697, blackvault: 1777