January 17, 2020
I am an American who values his Freedom of Speech and Press. So when I express my antisexuality or hatred of sexual intercourse, I feel that I should not be censored for such hatred. And not many people censor me for such hatred, but some do. It's bewildering, because nobody would censor me for hating tennis. Yet for some reason, sex is supposedly given a lot of superficial value or respect within some societies. Sex is an activity, nothing more and nothing less. For people to add value to such a simple activity, to a point where they censor other people's opinion of it, is truly sad. There is no greater sadness than being deprived of a freedom to express an opinion.
I don't care for prosexual people, and I would not censor a man who says "sex is good and you should have sex." However, antisexuals are not treated with the same respect. Some societies accept heterosexuals and prosexual persons; but censor or destroy homosexuals, antisexuals, and other sexual persons. Some societies depend on sexual intercourse because it can produce children for armies, labor forces, and materials. Anything that discourages sex can be considered a threat, especially antisexuals. They further censor antisexuals because they know the deadly truths and dangers of sex, but continue to allow a system of sexual exploitation at the cost of women's lives.
I hate sex. Sex grows diseases, disrespects homosexuals, allows discrimination, perverts gender, facilitates rape, kills mothers and babies, and enslaves women. But since sex can produce children, some societies accept sex for the sake of growing and maintaining populations at the expense of women's lives. Some societies do not provide sex education or provide an inadequate amount of sex education, even though sex crimes continue to be a huge issue for many women. They don't want kids to learn the dangerous truths about sex, since then those kids will grow into adults who fear sex and then will not produce kids via sex.
Instead, some societies inadequately moderate sexual environments. I live in a city where women are allowed to walk around half-naked and where nearly every building has some radio playing romantic sexual music. I'm considering buying special headphones to block prosexuality and unsolicited sexuality within my city. Women deal with worse prosexuality: they are sometimes raped and then forced to be mothers due to legal barriers preventing abortion. Some societies belittle rape and do not investigate rape cases.
The contemporary practice of sex is naturally destructive and dangerous. Sex creates a humid and moist environment ideal for bacteria, germs, infections, and disease. Individuals performing sex are also naked, so the chance of infection increases. Not only can a naked individual get infected from another individual, she cna also get infected from the environment like dirty sheets or stained beds. Women's privy parts are more moist and open than men's privy parts, and so women are more susceptible to infection. Then the man usually directly puts his fluids into the woman, which can be a direct infection of the woman with germs, bacteria, and disease: contaminated fluids are put directly into the woman!
Condoms break. Condoms don't provide protection from saliva or skin infections. Mankind knows little about disease, especially rabies and cancer. Diseases adapt and evolve to antibiotics, and are a constant issue for doctors. Some sexually transmitted diseases go undetected or may not have been discovered yet. Some diseases are purposely promoted and engineered by terrorists and prostitutes.
There are safer practices to acquire children including adoption, surrogacy, artificial insemination, reproductive technology, and etc. However, lust and sadomasochism are only a few of the barriers preventing civil reproduction. I await the day of artificial wombs as well.