Susan Rice Named National Security Advisor | General Discussion Topics | Forum


Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Susan Rice Named National Security Advisor
June 5, 2013
6:00 pm
Forum Posts: 1776
Member Since:
August 26, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Tom Donilon, National Security Advisor OUT, Susan Rice (Yes, the same of Benghazi controversy) IN. Let's get beyond Benghazi - the conspiracy and cover-up and whether or not they truly exist. Doesn't anyone else see the blatant arrogance by Obama to put her into a post despite the CONTROVERSY; having this post not require Senate confirmation; and to simply not have any regard for the current scandals (3 on my last count) plaguing the White House today? She just happens to be heavily entwined in one of the biggest - but right now - none of that matters.

In my honest and humble opinion - this is a blatant slap in the face to anyone (Republicans or Democrats alike) that no matter what controversy, scandal or cover-up, people like Susan Rice, Eric Holder, and whomever else Obama wants in, will stay in, regardless of what the American people, or their elected officials, think. Of course any administration will have controversal nominees and appointees, I get that. But with the current scandals, this one should not have taken place - not today.

(For the record, I do not blame Susan Rice on Benghazi. Unfortunately, again in my opinion, she was the patsy and the scapegoat in regards to Benghazi to take the heat off President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton when it all hit the fan. She probably isn't a bad person, and played her cards right when she withdrew from the running for Secretary of State. But now this?)

John Greenewald, Jr.
The Black Vault Website Owner / Operator

June 6, 2013
12:35 am
Forum Posts: 564
Member Since:
August 27, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This must be that special brand of "forward!" the Progressives talk about. Blinders and all. :wall:

The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
35 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10275

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24651

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8962

Posts: 124099

Newest Members:

ifuwyg, Noctus, PRE-KNOWLEDGE 9/11- AMERICAFIRSTBILL.COM, Deezie, eureka50, wtpooh, Spud Murphy, CARSON, Sassy971, jacksdoc17

Administrators: John Greenewald: 632, blackvault: 1776