{"id":2912,"date":"2017-01-04T00:48:51","date_gmt":"2017-01-04T00:48:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theblackvault.com\/casefiles\/?p=2912"},"modified":"2020-06-10T20:53:21","modified_gmt":"2020-06-10T20:53:21","slug":"analysis-samples-snow-formation-holland-february-2-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theblackvault.com\/casefiles\/analysis-samples-snow-formation-holland-february-2-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Analysis of Samples from a Snow Formation (Holland, February 2, 2010)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Background<\/h3>\n

Two formations in snow appeared in December 2009, one on December 19th and the other on December 22nd. (See http:\/\/bltresearch.com\/robbert\/snow09.php<\/a>. Observations of them included:<\/p>\n

a.) No footprints were found in the rings or elsewhere in the field;
\nb.) No marks of any kind in the centers of the circular rings;
\nc.) Rings were created by removal of the top 4 inches of snow, but snow was not removed down to the surface of the soil.
\nd.) No evidence of the snow that had been removed to create rings (where did it go?);
\ne.) No evidence of icing in the rings (which would be expected if something had been used to melt the snow in the rings).<\/p>\n

Another snow formation appeared on February 2, 2010. There was much less snow on the ground than in the above formations, and this one is also very \u201crough\u201d looking, i.e. not as \u201cgeometric\u201d or precise. And there are \u201cscrape\u201d marks, the same as appeared in the larger rings in the other two formations, as if somebody just dragged something around and around. There are no footprints anywhere in any of the rings, and even the slightest weight on the snow leaves a very clear mark. This time snow samples were collected for analysis. Following are diagrams of the formation with sampling locations, as well as photographs.<\/p>\n