AUFORN

From The Black Vault Encyclopedia Project

Jump to: navigation, search

In 2001 Diane Harrison of the AUFORN (Australian UFO Research Network) took on the task of contacting Australian UFO Researchers and the general public for expressions of interest in starting the Australian UFO Disclosure Project. Diane placed A4 size advertisements in some of Australia's prominent New Age magazines and with the help of Keith Basterfield and a group called AURA this project began in 2003.

Contents

DISCLOSURE: AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE

The proposed goals of this article are to:


  • Outline the history of “disclosure” in a number of countries over the years in relation to the the recent US Disclosure Project
  • Review what has been undertaken in Australia to date
  • Outline a specific strategy for an Australian “disclosure” project
  • Challenge Australian UFO organisations and individual researchers to become involved.




Introduction

Over the last two years, in Australia, there has been much discussion of the concept of “disclosure” in relation to the UFO phenomenon. Many of you present today, will have heard of the Disclosure Project headed by Dr Steven Greer which has undertaken an enormous amount of work in this direction. However, despite lots of discussion, there seems to have been very little concrete action by Australian UFO researchers about “disclosure.”


Keith explored:


  • Explore the history of “disclosure” in a number of countries over the years
  • Look closely at the recent “disclosure” project
  • Review what has been undertaken in Australia to date
  • Propose a specific strategy for an Australian “disclosure” project
  • Challenge Australian UFO organisations and individual researchers to become involved.


What does the use of the word “disclosure” conjure up in our minds? A strict dictionary definition states that “disclosure” means:


  • to expose
  • to make known
  • to reveal.


After talking to a number of UFO researchers here in Australia, they tell me that they have a more precise definition as regards the use of the word “disclosure” when talking about the UFO phenomenon. What they mean by “Disclosure” is that “World Governments will reveal what they know about the UFO phenomenon to the general population.”


Tantalizing stories of Australian Government involvement 1

In 1958 Stan Seers, then President of the Queensland Flying Saucer Research Bureau met someone who introduced himself as from the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO.) This man was looking for “hot” UFO information. Contact with the group was maintained until 1970. (Good p166.)


A brief review of the history

Keith Basterfield presented details of what has been undertaken over the years in a limited sampling of countries of the world. This review is not meant to be exhaustive, but more of an overview of what has been undertaken in some countries.


  • The United Kingdom


As early as 1955, a British member of Parliament posed a question asking “…whether the Air Ministry inquiry into the existence of “flying saucers” had been completed; and whether the Air Ministry proposes to publish a report.” The Ministry held that there had been “No formal inquiry.” (Clarke & Roberts p12.)Twelve years later, in 1967 Sir John Langford-Hott, a Member of Parliament, lobbied the Government for access to Government UFO files. Behind the scenes in Parliament, Ufologist Julian Hennessey led this campaign looking for copies of the Ministry of Defence’s (MOD) most impressive cases. However, this request for access was rejected. (Clarke & Roberts p247.) As the Government had on occasions stated that UFOs were not a national security issue, an alternate approach was through the medium of science. Scientists from the University of London approached the MOD for access to files in 1975 but were rejected. (Clarke & Roberts p247.)


One of the UK’s premier ufologists, Jenny Randles, took up the campaign in 1978, again looking for access to Government UFO records. Eventually Jenny was told that the MOD were willing to consider providing reports on specific instances to some people. In fact, Jenny herself received some MOD reports. However this co-operation ceased in 1983. (Clarke & Roberts p249.) Quite a few UK UFO researchers have accessed Government UFO files through the Government’s Public Record Office. As there is currently no Freedom of Information (FOI) Act in the UK, researchers needed to resort to the use of the Public Records Act, under the 30 year rule, to obtain Government documentation. Most recently, English researchers, David Clarke and Andy Roberts have mined these archives and followed up by interviewing ex-military personnel involved in some of the events described in the archives.


Their findings were that:


  • UK military personnel had observed and reported UFOs
  • The UK Ministry of Defence did have an interest in UFO reports
  • In the 1950’s some household names in the British Establishment formed a

personal view that UFOs were extraterrestrial.


In summary Clarke and Roberts stated:


"British Governments have followed in the footsteps of their American allies and repeatedly denied any interest in the subject. In public at least, military experts have poured scorn upon reports of sightings and justified their indifference by claiming that UFOs are of “no defence significance." (Clarke & Roberts p1.)


  • Belgium

Following the large number of UFO reports over Belgium in 1989-1990, calls were made to the Belgium government for an explanation of these reports. The Belgium Minister of Defence issued a statement saying that the UFOs were not AWAC aircraft, not F-117A stealth aircraft, not teleguided military machines and not ultra light aircraft. The Minister was, however, silent on what had actually been behind the observations.


  • France


In 1974 Robert Galley the then French Minister of Defence, admitted in a radio interview that UFOs exist and that the French government had taken them seriously. He also revealed that the Government had a Department studying the subject since 1954. (Bourret p 75.) By 1977 the French Government had established a Study group for Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena (GEPAN) as a Department within the French Space Agency. GEPAN concluded that on rare occasions, phenomenon occurred that were unexplained. GEPAN produced many public reports on its investigations. In 1988 GEPAN was replaced by a group called the Atmospheric Re-entry Phenomena Expertise Department (SEPRA). By 1998 the GEPAN/SEPRA files consisted of 3,000 UFO reports, out of which some 100 were comprehensively investigated, but only a few cases were said to have remained unidentified. (Sturrock pp131-135.)


  • Italy

In 1978 the Italian Ministry of Defence released a file containing six unclassified reports made by military personnel in 1977. (Good p141.)


  • Spain


In 1976 staff of the Spanish Air Ministry handed a file to a journalist which contained 12 of the country’s most outstanding UFO cases.


  • The US


The early days

Disclosure was on the mind of US researcher Donald Keyhoe as early as 1950. Speaking of a Navy officer’s report of three disc sightings which had been cleared for release by the US Department of Defence, he wrote:


“Was it an incredible slip-up? Or was it part of some carefully thought out plan? I believe it was part of an elaborate programme to prepare the American people for a dramatic disclosure.” (Keyhoe 1950 p 14.) In his concluding remarks in this book Keyhoe stated “I believe that Americans should be told the truth now.” (Keyhoe 1950 p191.)


In his 1953 book “Flying Saucers from Outer Space” Keyhoe started off his work by asking the question “What shall the public be told about the flying saucers?” The implicit question of “who” should do the telling-was that it would be the US Government. (Keyhoe 1953 p13.)


The US document trail


The US Freedom of Information Act came into being in 1966, and UFO researchers made use of it to request UFO related documents from the US Air Force, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Later efforts were made to extract similar documentation from the National Security Agency (NSA). Greenwood estimated that some 4,000 pages were obtained up to 1984 with a similar amount between 1985-1995 and slowing thereafter. (Greenwood pp 619 ff.) However, Clarke and Roberts wrote that by the late 1980’s some 30,000 UFO related documents had been released, including documents from the CIA and the FBI. However, Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) and NSA material was with held. (Clarke & Roberts p247.)


Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) was formed in 1977 as a lobbying group to have Government agencies release all UFO materials. CAUS was involved in several high profile court cases, but CAUS ceased operation in 1982. However, it was reborn in 1984. This time, not as a lobbying group, but as a group reporting on the document flow.


Tantalizing stories of Australian Government involvement 2


A multi-witness event, which included the finding of a large crushed area of grass, occurred at the Westall High School, Clayton, Melbourne on 6 April 1966. Witnesses related how military people had arrived, examined the site and took soil samples.


Steven Greer’s campaign

The most well known, recent, and in deed, continuing project was one started by the US based Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence (CSETI). The CSETI Project Starlight program was a disclosure project aimed to convey three facts:


  1. “There is substantial scientific and witness evidence for the existence of ET life forms in proximity to the Earth.
  2. While the specific motives of these life forms may not be totally understood, there is no evidence that they are hostile, and there is no reason for fear or alarm.
  3. The world community needs to establish an open discussion on this matter and take constructive steps to ensure a peaceful, sustainable relationship with these life forms.”


  • (Greer p4.)

CSETI was seeking “The definitive disclosure that we are not alone in the universe, and that, more importantly, these advanced life forms are landing on terra firma…” (Greer p5.)


Greer’s expressed view was that this revelation would mean an alteration of “…the fundamental paradigm of how we view ourselves, the world of humanity and the universe” leading to a functional, peaceful civilised world.


There were in fact two threads to CSETI. One was the Project Disclosure Starlight project and the other was the CE5 initiative. This latter initiative was aimed at intentionally establishing direct contact with ET spacecraft. CSETI claimed this was successful on a number of occasions in Mexico, England, Belgium and the US.


What was the methodology of the Project Starlight program?


In 1993 CSETI began an undertaking to brief world leaders on the subject of the UFO phenomenon with an aim of demonstrating the existence/reality of UFOs as extraterrestrial craft. This would then lead to the active participation of world leaders in disclosing the truth to the world. A meeting was arranged of military and civilians who met to discuss how best to liaise with the Government.


Two years later, in 1995, another meeting was convened of the most important military and government witnesses who had been located-two dozen of them. The ultimate aim was said to be open hearings of the US Congress on the subject.


By 1996 CSETI announced that it had completed the initial evidence and witness testimony gathering phase and initial round of briefings of world leaders.


By the following year, 1997, CSETI had arranged a Washington D.C. meeting of nearly 20 of the first hand government witnesses it had located. These 20 were out of 107 such witnesses identified by CSETI. This closed, confidential briefing included members of Congress, congressional staff, White House staff, etc. The purpose of the meeting was for the attendees to hear direct witness testimony from the witness group. CSETI also handed out a Briefing Document which detailed UFO cases and US Government documents.


The Disclosure Project then became a separate entity. The current “Disclosure project” website introduction states that it is “A nonprofit research project working to fully disclose the facts about UFOs, extraterrestrial intelligence and classified advanced energy and propulsion systems.” There is now said to be over 400 government, military and intelligence community witnesses.


The Disclosure Project held a high profile meeting at the National Press Club in 2001. At this meeting, the testimony of 20 government witnesses was presented, and known government documentation was discussed.


Tantalizing stories of Australian Government involvement 3


In the 1990’s, the Head of the Military Police Unit, Department of Army in Adelaide attended a UFO Research (SA) meeting. He advised that he and his men were willing to conduct UFO interviews for the group. UFOR(SA) rejected the offer



What has been done so far in Australia?


In the wake of the 1959 Reverend Gill close encounter case in New Guinea, civilian UFO groups undertook some “Disclosure” style action. A copy of Reverend Gill’s report was forwarded to all members of the Federal House of Representatives. Members were asked to lobby the Minister for Air for a statement from him on the Gill events.(Chalker 1996a.) Senator J L Cavanagh, in 1963, asked “…that the Federal Government dossier on UFOs should be made public,” but the Minster of Air refused. (Good p162.)


Between 1982 and 1984 Bill Chalker examined the majority of the UFO files held by the RAAF at the Directorate of Air Force Intelligence offices in Canberra. He also reviewed the UFO files held by the Department of Aviation, in Melbourne. Bill has extensively reported on his findings in a large number of articles over the years as well as in his 1996 book “The Oz files.” (1996b.) In September 1989, under the Federal FOI Act Keith requested access to and copies of documents which related to reported observations of UFOs made to, or referred to, the Department of Defence between 1 Dec 1977 and 1989. She received about 100 pages of information. These included details of 15 UFO cases, together with various letters and other documents. Around this time Keith also used the Federal Archive Act – under the release of documents more than 30 years old rule - to obtain copies of various RAAF files relating to observations and policy on the subject between 1955 into the early 1960’s. Several hundred pages of information were obtained in this way.


What of other Government agencies?


In August 1989, Keith sent off Freedom of Information requests to a number of other Australian Government agencies including the Federal Police, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, and the then Department of Transport and Communications. Each of these Government agencies advised they did not hold any documents relating to UFOs. In 1994 Bill Chalker used the FOI Act to attempt to unearth documentation from the DIO (JIB & JIO). However, this had to be abandoned due to costs and the claimed exemptions.


*2002

In February 2002, two individuals from New South Wales, Dyson Devine and Vivienne Legg forwarded information about the US Disclosure Project to Australian parliamentarians. A letter, accompanied by a summary of the Disclosure project was sent to each of the 222 members of the Australian Federal Parliament, covering both the Senate and the House of representatives. 10% of the Parliamentarians were said to have responded. Devine and Legg’s comments were that “…not a single one of these responses was appropriate.” (web site www.gaiaguys.net/DisclosureprojectAustrepli.htm) Through a series of notices in the Australasian UFOlogist and other Newage magazines, AUFORN has been seeking to raise the profile of Disclosure and has called for interested parties to become involved in an Australian Disclosure project.

*2003

Recently, Keith Basterfiled undertook some research into what opinions Australian UFO groups and individual researchers had on the topic of “Disclosure”. In addition this research looked at what action these groups/individuals had taken, or would like to take, in the Australian context.


Firstly, Keith spoke to a number of people in Australia, then circulated a ten question questionnaire to Australian UFO research groups and individual researchers seeking their views on these questions. 21 responses in total, mainly from UFO organisations, were received.


Question one was: “When the word “disclosure” is used in the context of the UFO phenomenon, what do you think of?” (Multiple responses were permitted)


These question can be viewed at the Disclosure Australia webpage.


*2004

DISCLOSURE AUSTRALIA - The journey so far

Based on a presentation by Debbie Payne at the Australian National UFO Conference June 2004.


During the course of this article I am going to try and give you a glimpse through a very small window into the Australian Government files on UFO’s.


What has to be understood is that the information beyond this window is so extensive, that it would be impossible for me to show you even a fraction of what has been discovered, let alone explain it to you. The hardest part in writing my recent paper was deciding on which files to present, so I tended to focus more on the ones that stood out for various reasons.


What I would like to suggest is that you log on to the Australian National Archives and view these files, just as AURA have done.

What is the Australian Disclosure Project?


The Collins dictionary defines the word “disclosure” as a revelation, to disclose, to make known, to allow to be seen. Over the last four or five years Australian UFO researchers like their counterparts overseas, have been discussing and debating the concept of “disclosure.” Many of you no doubt will be familiar with the US “Disclosure” Project headed up by Dr. Steven Greer and the enormous amount of work his team has done in this direction. But it hasn't stopped there.


Just recently I received an email penned by AJ Gevaerd expressing his commitment to a Brazilian disclosure program. You might also recall at last years National UFO Conference, Victor Viggiani gave a presentation and raised awareness on the Canadian disclosure effort. And then we had that extraordinary footage of UFO’s tracked by the military over Mexico in March, which received world-wide media coverage .The momentum of the Disclosure Program, regardless of who is behind it, has well and truly progressed into the global arena.


But the substance of this article isn’t to weigh up the absolute arguments for and against the existence of UFO’s; I think we already know the answer to that. It's to present enough viable evidence in the form of raw data to challenge the belief systems of those, who for whatever reasons are uninformed or sceptical. It's not about the analysis of what we have found so far because once we have collated enough data from the files we’ve had released, then the analysis will be the focus of our future efforts. We estimate this whole process could take a couple of years.


But, by following this methodical procedure I think it will strengthen the resolve of established and committed researchers that their work is both viable and important to the understanding of the overall phenomenon. Everyone in some way contributes a piece to the jigsaw puzzle and the picture is becoming clearer.


What we have done during the first stages of the Australian Disclosure Project is to find out exactly how many records exist in the Australian Government sector about UFO's and to what extent they pursued, and indeed still pursue this issue.


We thought that by doing this first, then disseminating all the available information to the public, in a verifiable and transparent manner, that it would improve ties between research groups to bring them together in pursuit of a common goal, and to a certain extent I think we've achieved this already.


These pages can now be viewed publicly by anyone. Mulled over, dissected, followed up, researched and individual conclusions reached. We are showing you what’s there. It’s up to you to decide what to do with it. However, whatever your conclusions may be, it certainly gives you a starting point for all kinds of research into this subject.

So where do you start on a project of this magnitude?

Our search began about a year ago with our own local knowledge and the National Australian Archives on-line records. Currently the on-line record search will only give access to around 10% of what is registered with the archives, but at least it was a place for us to start. At one stage we punched in “Reports on Flying Saucers”. To our surprise this search term, unlike searches we did on the term “U.F.O”, produced around 20 files.


In these 20 files there were around 5,000 pages of information, but we had no idea about what they contained, or to what extent the government had documented them. I can only tell you we were more than encouraged after viewing the first few documents. Imagine what it will be like when the remaining 90% can be accessed?

Who kept UFO files?

You will see from the list below there were numerous resource channels open to us. Those being:-

  • The RAAF
  • The CSIRO,
  • Dept of External Affairs, including the Department of Territories
  • Royal Australian Navy
  • The Department of Supply at Woomera
  • DSTO at Edinburgh Air Force Base - DSTO meaning - Defence Science and Technology Organisation which was formerly The Long Range *Weapons Research Establishment or WRE.
  • The Bureau of Meteorology
  • The Department of Civil Aviation
  • and “The Committee”

More recently, under the Freedom of Information Act we obtained over 600 pages of information, but this figure is due to increase very shortly by a further 2,300 pages, because the RAAF have kindly granted us access to another 38 files. Enigmatic files to say the least.


These 38 files were suspiciously unavailable the first time we asked, then we were told they had been destroyed and on the last request they were located and made available, because this time we went through a different channel. So sometimes it all depends on who you speak to.


Currently all these files from the departments previously mentioned total some 12,000 odd pages and have cost AURA over $1800 to date to obtain.


Unfortunately I can only present a few reports in more detail due to our limited space, so at least you will get to know something about the content of these files and the extent of their information. I have tried to be as diverse in subject matter as I can with my chosen examples, just to demonstrate the intriguing number of very different cases recorded in these files. Some may be familiar to you as famous Australian cases and others you won’t have heard of. I wanted you to see that the Government did keep detailed files on our most famous cases.

The table you see below only PART of one page of hundreds of file summaries we have done


Summary of file number A703 580/1/1 Part 4 titled "Reports on Flying Saucers and Other Aerial Objects" located at the Canberra office of the National Archives of Australia. The file consists of 346 pages. A digital copy of these pages is available on the National Archives web-site. * See note below

Page 1

Cover of file 580/1/1

2. Minute paper from Department of Air re re-classification of this file to unclassified 7/5/1982

4. Telegram [original file ref:554/1/30 (34)] re information received from Croker Island Mission of vertical light seen by a dozen people for last several nights. HMAS Bass to investigate. 2/11/65 ex 554/1/30 (34)

5. Telegram ex MIL Command Port Moresby re unknown aircraft (jet) in vicinity of Mamote 24/10/65 ex 554/1/30 (24)

7. Typed report on above. Object 100ft x 15ft cigar shaped emitting green luminescence 15/10/65

17. Minute Paper (memo) from D/Dafi (ops) to SACAS re UFO sighting, wanting an explanation 30/9/65

20-21. Ex Dept Defence cover letter to Dafi and CAPIO re Nebo case 24/9/65

22-23. Cover letter ex Dept Territories re UFO report off Milne Bay, New Guinea. Red light changed to blue. 12 & 13 July 1965.

26-30. Report by B.C.Roberts from Operations Office Dept Air (DAFI) - February 1965 - regarding Unidentified Flying Objects - An Assessment, based on Aust, US and British Air Force reports - very interesting report, mentions USAF Intell and reports SINCE 1947

  • (Some lines have been removed due to size of this document)


Why did we do it this way?


Rather than have other researchers laboriously go through every one of the thousands of pages at the Archives, looking for something in particular, we wrote brief notes on the content of every page, in every file. By doing this, anyone can go to these file summaries and scan through them to find what they're looking for. Like an index. Keeping in mind of course that the NAA files were obtained under the 30 year rule, which makes 1973 the most current record we are able to access at this present time. But I will tell you, that when January the first clicked over this year, another 14 files appeared on our standard search.


However, files released under the FOIA Act can be a lot more recent so don’t think we are only limited to files prior to1974. We’re not. We have also conducted register searches at our local National Archives Office in Adelaide, something we will endeavour to carry out at various other archive offices around the country.


All the files you see as digital copies on-line can be viewed on your personal computers, in the luxury of your own homes. These records are currently held at the head office of the National Archives in Canberra. And contrary to conjecture from some who are very quick to imply we won’t find anything new in our recently released government files, we have uncovered hundreds of pages of documents that have never seen the light of day, so statements of this nature are completely without substance.


What do we know now, that we didn't know a year ago?


In a word, plenty! We know that Australia, especially the RAAF and the Long Range Weapons Research Establishment at Woomera were deeply involved with other governments and various intelligence organizations, including NASA, in joint space programmes and the sharing of information relating to anything space based. So my first file will have something to do with international co-operation and interest in this subject



What was Project Moondust?


In 1953 the USAF 4602nd Air Intelligence Service Squadron was created. Its purpose was to recover downed enemy aircraft during the Korean War. In 1957 it was expanded to recover objects and debris from space vehicles, that had survived re-entry from space to earth, and in 1961, according to a United States Air Force Memo, it included UFO’s.


While researching the topic of Project Moondust on the internet, I came across a 42 page file released under the USA freedom of information act which clearly demonstrates a link between UFO's - the United Nations - and Project Moondust. I should mention here that copyright for these documents on this site is recognised as belonging to Dr. Bob Wood & Ryan S. Wood.


On the first page of these documents the subject header simply reads: “Project Moondust”, and dates from November 1973. It concerns the recovery of what may have been Soviet satellite debris. However, also included in this 42 page package are documents on a 1978 discussion concerning the potential of having the United Nations undertake UFO investigations, to report on UFO sightings and to retrieve crashed objects from different countries.


It also mentions the recovery of a spherical object (said to have landed smoothly) in Buenos Aries in 1984. So Moon Dust was very much a global project. But a singular statement recounted by the American delegate to the United Nations made by the Prime Minister of Grenada leaps out at you on page9 and reads as follows:


"the recent report of the abduction of a Cessna Aircraft in Australia seemed to him to be a compelling reason for the United Nations to "come alive to its responsibilities and take a serious look at the UFO phenomenon, to which Planet Earth has been conspicuously exposed since 1947."


Two words immediately caught my attention in this phrase. The word abduction, which was used to describe the disappearance of Freddy Valentich. Not crashed, lost, or missing at sea, but abducted. And of course the reference to 1947, which we all come across during the course of our research. It seems to be a definitive time in Ufology. We have pre 1947 and post 1947 as a way to categorise the modern era of sightings.


On the last line of this U.N. report you will clearly see the word - abduction.


On the next page (page 10), it states that 133 countries had already provided reports regarding UFO's for the express purpose of setting up a U.N. sponsored committee to study the phenomenon. Jaques Vallee, Stanton Friedman and J Allen Hynek were also present at this meeting.


However, the official reason for Project Moondust was to retrieve downed space vehicles, and what we wanted to know, was whether or not Australia participated in this Project.


I am certain the answer is yes, we did.



Crash Retrieval Team


The Department of Supply file SA 5644/2/1 contains a 1962 memo from the Controller of WRE to the Superintendent at Woomera. In it, he states that “the United States Embassy” sought WRE’s assistance to obtain information about sightings, or of downed fragments of space vehicles.


This location and recovery of fragments was exactly the role of the US Air Force Project Moon Dust, and the request to Australia was made a year after the project commenced in full force to include UFO’s. In our reading of the Supply file, there is never actually a mention of the words “Project Moon Dust.” However, as it was a classified US project perhaps this is not surprising. Under this banner the Australian Government located and retrieved several items of interest, which we have listed on our web-site.


It also means that the military had in place a “quick response unit”. In his 1996 document: “UFOs Sub Rosa Down Under-The Australian Military & Government Role in the UFO Controversy” Bill Chalker wrote:


It appears JIO have a “rapid intervention” capability, as they have been able to instigate prompt widespread ground searches in suspected “hardware” crashes. They do this through “special access” channels. This operation may be similar to the US activity operating under the code name Project “Moondust.


Australia did participate in Project Moon Dust. Did have and still has, a “rapid intervention team” connected to the defence department.


The reason I am so confident that the rapid intervention team exists, is partly due to a number of conversations a member of our AURA team has had with a resident of Woomera, who is retired from the military but still lives there. He claims to have been a member of this retrieval team and at the moment we are trying to corroborate his story.


Inkerman Qld from March 1968


Given to US Embassy Australia. No known results. [RAAF file J63/25 5/40/AIR PART 1]

You can read more at "The Australian Disclosure Project" webpage



Source:

  • Basterfield, Keith, Disclosure – An Australian Perspective, Australian UFO Research Association (AURA), 2003
  • Payne, Debbie, The Australian Disclosure Project – What the Government has on UFOs, Australian UFO Research Association (AURA), June 2004

External link:

Copyright

"Original data received from Wikipedia on April 23, 2006. Credit given to original authors can be seen Here."

Retrieved from "http://www.theblackvault.com/wiki/index.php/AUFORN"
Personal tools