Am I the only one who can see this is no more that the viciousness of the gay or liberal adgenda, digging up the slightest bit of dirt reaql or otherwise, to squash what she believed? it only shows the absolute intorerance the liberials or gays have for rights they dismiss for others, in order to achieve their adgendas. This is the same viciosness you watched for 8 years of the Bush Administration, not having any boundries of decency in the character assasinations ever since the Gore loss.
If this was purly a religious based opinion from Prejean, she has the right to religous freedom, and never even mentioned a word badly about gays in her answer. Should she be expected to abandon her belief in God and how she was raised to lie for something her upbringing says is imoral? She also had the right, to stand on her right to a secret voting balllot, but did not do that. What is shamefull is the gay and liberal adgendas both demand vehamently their rights at the cost of oppressing the rights of others. In this case a relious belief and a voting right. They have NO RESPECT for religous rights, or the right to live your life accordingly. Even if neither of these 2 were the case, it was still the rights of Prejeans parents to raise her with the thoughts of marrying and have children with a man, and not raise her to prepare for a life being a lesbian.
She did nothing wrong in her answer to Parez Hilton, and that is the person who should be on the chopping block right now. Distroying a young girl for an agenda 52% of California just voted against.