I love reading/learning about similarities in so-called "myths" that are so strikingly similar as to be very hard to dismiss the idea that they share the same source. Which, according to mainstream science, is impossible since ancient cultures were unaware of each other and had no contact with each other due to limited navigational understanding/experience back then.
In reading different cultures flood "myths" it is amazing to me how these stories, allegedly totally independent of each other, share such extreme similarities. When you really consider what is said in these stories, it is just way beyond logical to even consider it is just mere coincidence.
I mean, if all these cultures' stories simply had to say, "hey my village was flooded, only a few survived, etc..." then it'd be easy to dismiss as coincidental and move on. But, when it has much more detail, it gets much harder to simply dismiss. Here is but a few examples:
The ancient Vedic Aryan Hindus (Indus Saraswati) spoke about a series of Ten Pitris who ruled before the global Flood. Ancient Babylonian legend speaks of a pre-Flood series of ten kings. The ancient Egyptians described Ten Shining Ones who ruled consecutively before the Deluge. The last of these kings in the aforementioned lists was the hero who led seven others aboard a vessel in which they survived the global Flood. In ancient India, the hero was Manu who survived the global-Flood with the Seven Rishis. In ancient Babylon, the hero's name was Zisudra who spear-headed the survival on the Ark of seven other humans, the Seven Apkallu. In ancient Egypt, the Flood hero was Toth who survived the Deluge along with the Seven Sages.
Of course, as is in every case, nothing is 100%. Same here. While flood myths exist in every culture, there are also differences in many cultures. I just find it highly interesting that cultures that allegedly never mingled, share such amazingly similar stories.










