greeney2 wrote:I just stated from your own words, you got the context of it, but did not actually read the 84 pages. Am I right? Your are the big expert who researches so much, did you actually read the 84 pages completely? I seriously doubt it.
Expert is your word of choice not mine..............you know what I think of experts.........
Anyway.............have you read the latest from NATO? The news they generated when one of their missions went haywire.........something about children and the likes....not many US Rags covered it in detail THAT is and are the kinds of things the US Press seems to barely touch upon........
Since Whitney Huston's passing I wonder what else is slipping through the cracks of Afghanistan?
It's as if you've a great deal of trouble with Old Glory and what you think she stands for. I understand that you make it crystal clear even with your veiled digs via the anti war crap..............anti war is a word coined by those you prosper from all the monies war generates..............It has nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of a battlefield whether how just or how unjust!
Afghanistan is a giant sewer hole of a cluster F#@k............There is no other way to classify it.............Only those who never left the 50's and 60's see things in the light of those pulling the strings............a sad thing in my book!!!
Where does it say that being opposed to this ridiculous dawg and pony show makes one anti war, or unAmerican???????????
Come show me the light, by all means point my lost soul in the right direction!
Cole












