The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

Government and Political Conspiracies

Montanans Launch Recall of Senators Who Approved NDAA Milita

Throughout time, there have been countless government and political conspiracies that have kept us wondering. This forum is dedicated to that very topic. Got a conspiracy theory of your own? Post it, and try to back it up as best you can!

Postby katsung47 » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:59 pm

Montanans Launch Recall of Senators Who Approved NDAA Military Detention.

Merry Christmas, US Senateby Ralph LopezFollow .
.Sun Dec 25, 2011 at 01:33 PM PST.
UPDATE 12/26/2011:


This is from a statement from Stewart Rhodes of Oathkeepers regarding Republican Denny Rehberg as a target of recall, who also voted for NDAA.

Here in Montana, while we will go after all three violators of the Bill of Rights, I will place special emphasis and "focus of effort" on Denny Rehberg, since he is so fond of wrapping himself in the flag and claiming to be defending the Constitution while his votes do the exact opposite. In that sense, Rehberg is much like John McCain and Lindsey Graham, two Republicans who, right along with Carl Levin and Joseph Lieberman, are leading a sustained and relentless assault on our Bill of Rights.
Moving quickly on Christmas Day after the US Senate voted 86 - 14 to pass the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA) which allows for the indefinite military detention of American citizens without charge or trial, Montanans have announced the launch of recall campaigns against Senators Max Baucus and Jonathan Tester, who voted for the bill.

Montana is one of nine states with provisions that say that the right of recall extends to recalling members of its federal congressional delegation, pursuant to Montana Code 2-16-603, on the grounds of physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of certain felony offenses.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/2 ... -US-Senate
katsung47
 
Posts: 664
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:59 am

Postby katsung47 » Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:04 pm

National Defense Authorization Act Outrage Continues To Grow Online
David Seaman |January 05, 2012

In case you've been living under a particularly large and comfy rock, the NDAA is a radical and dangerous bill -- which Barack Hussein Obama quietly signed into law on New Year's Eve, while almost every American was preoccupied with New Year's binge drinking. (His administration had previously vowed to veto the NDAA, before strangely reversing course and signing it into law. He issued a signing statement saying his administration would not use the controversial indefinite detention provisions. This promise, however, is not legally binding -- and it also does not prevent future Presidents from detaining and torturing American citizens without the right to a trial or attorney, and without bringing formal charges against them. The signing statement is the legal equivalent of a Post-it note affixed to a manuscript.)


....
http://articles.businessinsider.com/201 ... -detention
katsung47
 
Posts: 664
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:59 am

Postby ricardo » Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:43 pm

katsung47 wrote:National Defense Authorization Act Outrage Continues To Grow Online
David Seaman |January 05, 2012
In case you've been living under a particularly large and comfy rock, the NDAA is a radical and dangerous bill -- which Barack Hussein Obama quietly signed into law on New Year's Eve, while almost every American was preoccupied with New Year's binge drinking. (His administration had previously vowed to veto the NDAA, before strangely reversing course and signing it into law. He issued a signing statement saying his administration would not use the controversial indefinite detention provisions. This promise, however, is not legally binding -- and it also does not prevent future Presidents from detaining and torturing American citizens without the right to a trial or attorney, and without bringing formal charges against them. The signing statement is the legal equivalent of a Post-it note affixed to a manuscript.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
friend .
when it goes to the supreme court. it may or may not be overturned.
the challenge will be to the highest level in our land to decide its constitutionality. not president Obama. note: his advisement is noted at this juncture as well. ( reservations) I hear you and agree . I'm concerned too.
a tactical move for long term strategic wellness of our country.

....
http://articles.businessinsider.com/201 ... -detention
User avatar
ricardo
 
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:10 pm


Return to Government and Political Conspiracies

  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest