greeney2 wrote:Not watching it, but defending it, and its poster, says everything about agendas.
Yeah greeney2... and where did I defend 'it'? I suppose because you said I defended 'it', it now must be true, right?
Just like the official version of 9/11 must be true because you were told so, huh?
Just like we had to invade Iraq because we were told of the imminent threat of WMD's, huh? We were told so. It must be true.
How could we have not known. Others believed it too, right? We were told as much. It must be true.
I never defended 'it' (video). In fact I never even referenced it other than to state that I didn't watch it.
I do not claim to not have an agenda. You're free to figure my agenda out as I'm free to figure yours.
Accusing me of defending this video (which I have not and do not intend to watch) speaks of your agenda.