The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

Government and Political Conspiracies

Cruise Missle Hits Pentagon CLASSIFIED interesting

Throughout time, there have been countless government and political conspiracies that have kept us wondering. This forum is dedicated to that very topic. Got a conspiracy theory of your own? Post it, and try to back it up as best you can!

Postby greeney2 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:29 pm

Ridiculas! The Globalhawk in 2001 only a few were made, and they were survalance unmanned aircraft, they were not bombers whatsoever. They flew, did survalance, and returned, they were spyplanes. They were small, lightweight, grossly overbudget, and only had a 2000 pound payload capacity, for survance like the U2 spyplane. The frame was lightweight aluminum with graphite wings, it is not a cruise missile which is a bombing system that homes in on a precise target with programed imaging or GPS. It flew at very high altitudes, for very long distances, where cruise missiles can fly close to the ground, homing in on targets.

No cigar on this one, its not even a close possiblity. No way did it have the tonage, nor payload capacity, to drive through an entire outer ring of the pentagon. Not to mention not a single theory of where it could have come from, been unexplained missing, and that the airliner just happens to maybe be shot down in the ocean. Bodies were IDed and buried from remains at the Pentagon, including those on the airliner. Do you see how preposterous these theories are when you put common sence to it? It doesn't make sence!
greeney2
 
Posts: 9669
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby zoltan2 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:29 pm

greeney2 wrote:Ridiculas! The Globalhawk in 2001 only a few were made, and they were survalance unmanned aircraft, they were not bombers whatsoever. They flew, did survalance, and returned, they were spyplanes. They were small, lightweight, grossly overbudget, and only had a 2000 pound payload capacity, for survance like the U2 spyplane. The frame was lightweight aluminum with graphite wings, it is not a cruise missile which is a bombing system that homes in on a precise target with programed imaging or GPS. It flew at very high altitudes, for very long distances, where cruise missiles can fly close to the ground, homing in on targets.

No cigar on this one, its not even a close possiblity. No way did it have the tonage, nor payload capacity, to drive through an entire outer ring of the pentagon. Not to mention not a single theory of where it could have come from, been unexplained missing, and that the airliner just happens to maybe be shot down in the ocean. Bodies were IDed and buried from remains at the Pentagon, including those on the airliner. Do you see how preposterous these theories are when you put common sence to it? It doesn't make sence!



The entry hole was 8 feet 3 inches in diameter and that is a fact. How says that a Golobalhawk could of not been teleguided with a bomb inside
Look at the pictures on this link and scroll down the link to see the pictures
The first picture show the hole while the immediate upper floor and windows are still intact. Where is there any debris of a jumbo jet in front of the building.
And do you honestly think that a 125 wing span and 100 tons of jumbo jet when into such a small hole of 8 feet and 3 inches in diameter while there is no visible wreckage.
Impossible

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... -11-a.html
Last edited by zoltan2 on Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby zoltan2 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:38 pm

Scoll to the pictures on the next link
Flight 93 never crashed in the empty field outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania on 9/11 or any other day.

An article detailing Flight 93's last minutes was briefly available at dailynews.yahoo.com on 9/11/2001.
It [does] not fit the official story of the last moments of Flight 93 and rapidly disappeared from news websites, but it can still be found at the web archive: It was reported that a missile was heard before the crash:
Debris fell from Flight 93 nearly six miles from the crash scene . . . human remains were found miles from the crash scene . . . light debris was found eight miles from the crash scene . . . and the following footage proves Flight 93 did not crash in a single piece but came apart in midair and scattered over a wide area . . .

Must see rare footage = <...NBC News Report.

The military refused to rule out a shoot down on September 15, 2001... ...and the Washington Envoy to Canada says Bush ordered a shoot down . . . What else is the government concealing about 9/11?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... ville.html
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby zoltan2 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:21 pm

Greeney2

Waiting for an answer have you seen debris of a 100 ton jumbo jet in the pictures
Waiting for an answer have you seen debris of a 100 jumbo jet crashed at Shanksville Pennsylvania
Have you listen to the news team that were immediately there.

This ain't no trash I hope you have to balls to reply
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby greeney2 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:37 pm

I answered already!
greeney2
 
Posts: 9669
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby zoltan2 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:39 am

greeney2 wrote:I answered already!


Yeah right . Why am I not surprise.

Just like even horizon you just don't answer directly.

Still Waiting for an answer have you seen debris of a 100 ton jumbo jet in the pictures taken moments from the pentagon
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... -11-a.html
Still Waiting for an answer have you seen debris of a 100 jumbo jet crashed at Shanksville Pennsylvania
Did you listen to the news team that were immediately there.

Evidence
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... -11-a.html

FLIGHT 93 CRASH EXPOSED! RARE FOOTAGE NEVER AGAIN SEEN ON TV
Do you see a jumbo jet boeing of 100 tons Greeney at Shanksville Pennsylvania
Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJOlwcJ6 ... re=related
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby zoltan2 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:40 pm

Only one engine was found inside the Pentagon. The two images below show two parts of the single engine found in the Pentagon. The left-hand image shows what appears to be part of the rotor element bearing the stubs of vanes. The right-hand image shows what appears to be the compressor (front) stage of the engine encased by its housing. This engine is barely a third the diameter of a large turbofan engine that powers the Boeing 757.

Engines found at the pentagon not from a Boeing 757

http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/f1_engine.jpg

http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/f2_engine.jpg

Real Boeing engine of a 757
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/pw2000.jpg
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby capricorn » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:39 pm

There are so many good reasons to doubt the official story the US government has given. Every point that Zoltan2 makes might not be the correct answer to the problem; however, he does a good job pointing out that there is in fact a problem. And it is not just he and others in this forum that would support an investigation into the 911 account, there are politicians , civilian groups and professionals who worked for the Bush administration that would too.

There is plenty of video that would quickly end the debate whether a plane hit the pentagon or not. However, the government has chosen to classify all of it except for 10 frames of video. And those 10 frames show nothing at all conclusive to suggest a plane hit the pentagon. To me, it is obvious they are hiding the rest of the evidence because they have something to hide.
"a free society depends on a virtuous and moral people."
User avatar
capricorn
 
Posts: 714
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:03 pm

Postby zoltan2 » Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:43 am

capricorn wrote:There are so many good reasons to doubt the official story the US government has given. Every point that Zoltan2 makes might not be the correct answer to the problem; however, he does a good job pointing out that there is in fact a problem. And it is not just he and others in this forum that would support an investigation into the 911 account, there are politicians , civilian groups and professionals who worked for the Bush administration that would too.

There is plenty of video that would quickly end the debate whether a plane hit the pentagon or not. However, the government has chosen to classify all of it except for 10 frames of video. And those 10 frames show nothing at all conclusive to suggest a plane hit the pentagon. To me, it is obvious they are hiding the rest of the evidence because they have something to hide.


That is my point. And it is not Anti American to find out the truth about raised questions.
If greeney son would of died in one of the World Trade Center or at the Pentagon he sure would react differently
Look at this picture taken minutes when the pentagon was hit.
You see the paramedics the army and the side of the pentagon still standing very well.
No debris at all of a 100 ton 757 jumbo jet.

http://media.hamptonroads.com/cache/fil ... 705151.jpg
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Previous

Return to Government and Political Conspiracies

  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there are 0 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 0 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests