according to his understanding of what that actually means is its the absolute truth..because its scientifically proven..which actually means proven to our understanding of what reasonable doubt is..but for him unfortunately...he has no impartiality when its said to be scientic fact...thats astounding...
Tairaa wrote:And, no. Not quite. That would be religion, science is always tweaking and tuning theories to match up with new evidence. This is why religion has given us nothing of use of several thousand years and science has put us in space and given us medicine and computers in a short few hundred years. Because it's objective is to learn, not preach regardless of blatant falsehoods in what it says.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests