I'm not trying to insult you. I think you did a great job so far. Those programs are tuff.
What program are you using to do this ?
Just curious. I have been trying to find something like this I can work with.
Oh no, I wasn't insulted.
I am very much an amateur. I'm aware of the off-ness, I just haven't quite figured out a way around the quarks individually. Sometimes what I try to do works out nicely the first time, sometimes it produces poor topology or it will create errors in geometry. Most of the little quarks are simply because I don't understand the program fully enough, lacking any education in it other then what I've been able to come up with. The rest of it is lack of skill at making it look the way I want it to look.
I am using 3ds max
This is a Lockheed P-38 Lightning, my favourite of the era.
There are lots of screw ups on this model, especially the cockpit, and the air intake/output on the sponsoons between the wings and the empennage. Oh, and at the tips of the wings. Prime example of not understanding. That same model viewed from almost all other angles shows no sign of that geometry error, even angles of similar orientation. And I have no idea why.
But that's all part of the fun.
"George Bush says he speaks to god every day, and christians love him for it. If George Bush said he spoke to god through his hair dryer, they would think he was mad. I fail to see how the addition of a hair dryer makes it any more absurd."