frrostedman wrote:
I heard on the news that (like I said) 70% of FLU CASES reported worldwide, test postive for H1N1.
In China, that number is 80%, and I just found that out by doing a quick Google, it was the first link.
From the (corrupt, dishonest, terrorist organization according to some) CDC for the current week:
No. of positive flu specimens 5,258. Of those, 3,889 are H1N1. That comes out to 74%, actually. That's just for the USA, week 43 or "current week."
Per the CIA fact sheet our population is 303,824,640 here in the US. So out of our population there are 5258 people with the flu and 3889 of those have the H1N1 flu. That puts the 70% or after your calculations of 74% in a much better perspective. I am sure the numbers have changed a bit since you posted the link. Evidently though a pandemic is not what is going on at this time at all. Again of course that is by looking at the old explanation of pandemic. Now China's population is 1,330,044,544. As of Nov 1st the Chinese Ministry of health reported there where 47,500 H1N1 cases reported. 104 severe cases and 7 deaths. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-11/03/content_8903117.htm
This also is not a pandemic.
Now globally we have about 6 billion people give or take. Globally somewhere between 250,000 - 500,000 people die of the flu. Just the flu. The death toll at this time for the H1N1 is approx. 5000. Again it is not a pandemic.
I really don't care what the WHO thinks a pandemic is since they have changed the meaning of the word. Best part is we should be having a pandemic every year just for the flu if we go by the new rules implemented by the WHO in 2005. Doesn't happen though. Swine flu just sounds so much more threatening. And now we are including our animals and the threat to them.
What I care about is if the death toll vs population is that low why pharmaceutical companies and the WHO and the CDC are pushing the vaccine and having ordered the material to make millions upon millions of vaccinations. It doesn't jive nor click. makes no sense from the perspective of the health field and the peoples well being.
However it seems in 2005 the WHO also changed how these scenarios are to be conducted.
From the WHO 2005 declaration: (excerpted) “ Under special pandemic plans enacted around the world including the USA, in 2005, national governments are to be dissolved in the event of a pandemic emergency and replaced by special crisis committees, which take charge of the health and security infrastructure of a country, and which are answerable to the WHO and EU in Europe and to the WHO and UN in North America.
I will honestly admit at this point I have not been able to verify this through WHO....but I have not stopped looking to find this statement or the 2005 declaration. I do know that I have run across many websites from different countries discussing this and having become active to not allow for the WHO to over shadow their own national laws.
While I am not ignoring those who have died.....the numbers in this case tell the real story, the actions of the pharmaceutical companies and this 2005 WHO declaration show much more of what the true story is.
Oh...and thanks for letting me know where you received your numbers from.










