The bright spot on the building prior to impact reminds one of the bright spots on the WTC Towers before the planes struck, which could have been power lasers that were focused to ensure the jet fuel ignited upon impact,
Some ppl say there was a "pod" under the plane that hit the South Tower, I have never been so sure, however the theory that nozzles were spraying jet fuel seemed about right, it still does not explain the bright spot on the P'gon, unless maybe the cruiser had a device that homed in on the laser spot!
Few weapons are capable of penetrating the amount of reinforced concrete seen in the Pentagon attack, this brilliant white fireball is typical of the plasma type reaction of a depleted uranium warhead.The remainder of this post is from http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/an
Rick M, “…we heard a sound like a missile”
Joel Sucherman, “...almost like a heat-seeking missile was locked onto its target.”
Micheal DiPaula, “...It sounded like a missile,”
Richard Benedetto, “...sounded like an artillery shell.”
Tom Seibert, “...sounded like a missile”
Witnesses that were inside the Pentagon at the moment of the strike, claim to have heard “whooshes”, smacks, etc.
Lon Rains was “convinced a missile” hit the Pentagon by the way it sounded and how fast it flew in, he stated, "...At that moment I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound that began behind me and stopped suddenly in front of me and to my left, in fractions of a second I heard the impact and an explosion. The next thing I saw was the fireball, I was convinced it was a missile, it came in so fast it sounded nothing like an airplane.Professor David H. Edwards, After I boarded the Orange Line [Metro Line] train, a young man and a young woman, both in their early twenties and wearing backpacks, burst into the subway car shouting and exhibiting extreme excitement and agitation.
They addressed the entire car, which was mostly empty except for me and perhaps three or four other men in suits. The young people yelled, “...We were standing at the Pentagon Station, waiting for the train to come, and we saw a missile fly into the Pentagon! We saw it, we saw it!”
One of the men sitting closer to them must have asked for clarification, because they reiterated the same information several times, saying repeatedly, “...a missile, we saw it, a missile, it flew right into the Pentagon, I can’t believe it.. now it’s on fire, there’s smoke!”
In a Parade Magazine interview, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, made his infamous slip of the tongue, "...Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.
Radiation experts have gone on record stating that the depleted uranium came from a missile.
Major Rokke, who once headed the military’s Depleted Uranium project, believes the Pentagon was hit by a missile, not a commercial jetliner, insisting that high radiation readings after the strike reinforces the fact that DU may have been used.
Most of these “shaped-charged” guided weapons contain a highly secret “dense metal” — called Depleted Uranium (DU), it is twice the density of steel, they easily penetrate steel, or reinforced concrete, and then explode with intense heat inside their targets.
Radiation expert Leuren Moret, stated, “…What happened at the Pentagon is highly suspicious, leading me to believe a missile with a depleted uranium warhead may have been used.
The U.S. Military’s newer generation weapons are far more devastating than can be imagined, numerous missiles and “smart” bombs now contain DU in their warheads.
Blast injuries and the high explosive damage would be consistent with a missile.If DU, up to 60% the radioactivity of normal was used like in large, explosive “hard-target” warheads MWS there will be very high levels of radioactive contamination. Any warheads containing uranium will cause permanent Alpha, Beta, and Gamma radiation hazards in the target areas. Thus, the reason why there was a decontamination process at the Pentagon was to remove and hide these radioactive materials.
Witnesses in the Pentagon!
Lt. Col. Marc Abshire, who described a shockwave, “…It shot me back in my chair. There was a huge blast. I could feel the air shock wave of it. … It was more of a direct smack.”
Peggy Mencl said, “It blew me 10 feet”.
Another blast victim observed, “...all of a sudden, the windows blew in.”
Sheila Moody, “ …heard a whoosh and a whistle and she wondered where all this air was coming from. Then a blast of fire that left as fast as it came.”
Mr. Peter Murphy, was knocked entirely across rooms, or down corridors.
Lt. Col. Brian Birdwell was knocked down, when he stood up, he realized he was on fire” it was reported that the medical teams had treated many blast injuries.
The exit hole on the inside of C Ring!
Other witnesses saw a C 130 plane flying close to the crime scene!A MWS cannot explain the complete effects to the Pentagon, such as the multiple explosions, how it burned all night, the explosive collapse of the roof, and isolated destruction caused by several different explosive events, nor can controlled demolition, only both together can explain the patterns of damage seen at both the WTC and the Pentagon.
Aircraft labeled MU-2 is circling above the drone relaying instructions via radio remote control.
Kelly Knowles, who lived a few miles from the Pentagon saw some sort of plane following the first jet toward the Pentagon, “…it seemed to be chasing the first."
Her account agreed with what her brother saw, “...it flew directly above the American Airlines jet, as if to prevent two planes from appearing on radar while at the same time guiding the jet toward the Pentagon.”
Others collaborated their story, Allen Cleveland stated, “...my brother in law also witnessed the same plane following the jet," he said that he saw, "...a jetliner flying low, and soon afterwards a military plane was seen flying right behind it.”
The C-130 not only guided the “jet” to the Pentagon, but made a full circle above it, before making a course due west, an Arlington National Cemetery worker claimed, “...that a mysterious second plane was circling the area when the first one attacked the Pentagon.”
An EC-130 (DC variant) is fully capable of controlling an aircraft remotely Photo: USAF
A military commander identified the aircraft as an “electronic warfare aircraft” EC-130, which is a C-130 modified for radar “jamming” or drone control.
The C-130 was noted to veer away about the time of the attack.200 If the C-130 veered away suddenly, does this indicates that this pilot was taking some sort of evasive action just prior to the collision and explosion?This would make sense of why the C-130 was following the other jet, which probably was a remote controlled drone. If the EC-130 was serving as the “eyes and ears” for the drone, then obviously it would want to stay close by, like following above for the best view.
With today’s technology it is easy to remote control an aircraft from the air, ground, or both simultaneously, many defense contractors produce remote control technology, such as Lockheed-Martin and Boeing,
All three of the 9/11 attacks had eerie similarities.. In support of the evidence for controlled demolition, missiles, and remote controlled aircraft is that these similar methods were used at the World Trade Center (WTC) attacks.
The infamous “missile flash” just prior to impacting WTC
Bright white warhead (c/w DU plasma) exiting the WTC.Ed: The flaming wreckage described as a DU penetrator, is thought to be a brightly burning magnesium wheel rim, part of the landing gear of the plane that struck the South tower.
Many researchers postulate that KC-767 tankers filled with fuel and explosives hit the WTC towers.
One person and one company, seems to stand out!
Rabbi Dov Zakheim pictured above left with arch conspirator Paul Wolfowitz, would later would become Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001, headed a high tech company, called System Planning Corp (SPC) that specialized in drone electronics.
According to the company website, they specialize in many areas of defense technology, including a highly sophisticated war-game technology that allows the control of as many as eight different drones from a remote location, either on the ground or airborne, with a range of several hundred miles.
This technology can be used on many different types of aircraft, including large passenger jets, in October 1994, NASA flew a Boeing 737 on 110 flawless remote controlled missions. It would seem System Planning Corp could convert just about any aircraft that suited their purposes into a remote control variant, and have it able to follow commands from the air or ground.
An EC-130 outfitted with the “DC” drone control gear would be an excellent platform for Rabbi Zakheim’s technology. One theory has the 767’s involved in the WTC attacks, as coming from the USAF KC-767 tankers that were outfitted with remote-control electronics.
Rabbi Zakheim was directly involved in both the tanker deal, with Richard Perle pictured above, and the drone technology.