1. I am not here to discuss the motives of Conspiracy Theorists vulcan6gun, those sorts of issues are of no interest to me and I believe I made that patently clear in my original posting.
2. I am seeking credible and scientific explanations to a series of questions I believe have gone to this date unanswered.
3. Agreed there is a lot of "dis-information" out there which makes getting to the truth so much harder.
4. I have been today been switching between this site and PilotsFor911Truth.org reading what is out there and watching provided evidence.
5. I find that this site if one wades thought the bickering, that there is some very good information which has come about because of good researchers.
6. PilotsFore911Truth is from my point of view, is a very well researched site which, is backed up by science when it comes to the aviation angle i.e flight paths, FDR (Flight Data Recorder) or Black Box information as provided by the NTSB, such that it is which, is then compared to the "Official Line" by seasoned pilots and other relevantly qualified persons.
7. As I have also stated, I believe this particular organization has raised questions and shown significant discrepancies in the official version of events which the NTSB and other alphabet agencies refuse to answer.
You go on to say in your closing the following:
"Because of the conspiracy theories which drew attention away, none of them were punished for their lack of action at the worst possible time. Go ahead, ask me why 9/11/01 conspiracy theories upset me. Oh wait, I just told you, didn't I..."
Which leads me put these questions to you:
1. If you abhor conspiracy theories as much as you claim ...why are you a member of a known Conspiracy Discussion website and participating in discussion about such theories
2. Is it merely your goal to debunk any and all persons who have questions or who dares to question the U. S Government's version of what happened
3. Or could you indeed be one of the "dis-information" agents you claim operate on such sites as this one
Which would therefore appear to be one of the very Conspiracy Theories you claim to have such a disliking to, somewhat a paradoxical situation if not hypocritical, don't you think
You further go on to say:
"AlphaOmega, Cole_Trickle, Tairaa, I found more photos of 9/11/01 aircraft (and human) wreckage for you. Warning: This link's not for kids!"
Do you imply that myself and these other people are children
That would in my view be your way of calling me out for a fight or is it a feeble and transparent attempt to derail an intelligent analysis of the questions I posed in my original post which, I very clearly and politely asked for.
Learn to play nice, I may be new here but I am nobody's whipping boy and I hazard a calculated guess that you are not, will not or have ever been good enough to try.
You then say:
"If you study the photos and ignore the site author's added text, they speak volumes about what happened. At least if, like me, you've done air crash recovery and been a military explosives handler they do..."
1. Ignoring text of the author of the site you recommended defeats the entire purpose of any investigation scientific or otherwise.
2. To do so would be irresponsible if one is seeking answers to questions.
3. It is akin to a Police Officer investigating a murder, ignoring eyewitness statements and not following up on leads which could quickly apprehend the perpetrator of the crime or as simple as not following procedure or reading instructions about handling explosive ordinance.
I am glad to have not followed you advice about the way in which to approach the site you recommend me to investigate, I hope this is not the same type of advice you would adhere to when handling Explosive Ordinance as I would hate to think you are typing with one hand whilst sitting at your computer in a wheelchair.
Back on topic please,
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. -Thomas Jefferson
Copies of all my posts are now kept on file.