If you happen to be in the country that I live, I would give you the chance to say what you believed in direct to my face by meeting you wherever you happen to reside in and I promise.
The problem is do you have the courage.
Thing about cowards trying to act tough behind their anonymity is that whichever way you look at it I mean even in the best of terms with the full generosity of the benefit of doubt, in the end cowardice is cowardice.
Lol, to be honest I didn't read the portion of your thread aimed at Greeney, who happens to be a stand-up fellow.
But upon Johns comment I couldn't help myself as to read what you'd said.
And in this above comment you've proved a few thing for me.
Primarily, you're unintelligent, and you're a hypocrite. As well, you think you're tough, and for some reason think that acting tough somehow constitutes as evidential support of your position.
And it is for these reasons that I'm relatively certain that you don't know your s*** from your oatmeal, and your claims (along with your claims of evidential support or god-forbid proof
) are nothing more then drivel. So you've failed in your objective, but what you have succeeded in doing is ensured me that this meier character is nothing worth looking into. Afterall, anyone who attracts minds like yours is probably a sensationalist. Sensationalists very rarely put forth arguments in favour of unbiased evidence and almost solely put forth arguments for the point of personal gain.
"George Bush says he speaks to god every day, and christians love him for it. If George Bush said he spoke to god through his hair dryer, they would think he was mad. I fail to see how the addition of a hair dryer makes it any more absurd."