The ONLY insequential detail that I was mistaken in was the laugh before saying that he was pretending to be dead and shooting him from a foot away. Woops! Sue me.
As for calling you a prick, you accuse me of lying, I accuse you of being a prick, from my way of thinking, being called a liar if far far worse then being called a prick.
Woops! Sue me for characterizing the Marines laughed, is obviously not a minor mistaken detail! You made it up, if that wan't in the film. Thats a pretty big detail and that congers up a totally different senerio, from what really happened. The details of your explanation, did not make sence to me, it could not have occured as you explained it. Thats not my fault, you wrote it, and now you are changing ONLY one little detail. Far from a little detail! If you somehow computed laughing when it didn't exsist.
I never used the words liar, I said the story did not ring true, and was right, wasn't I? That your inturpetation didn't sound exactly right. Yet you choose on the other post to edit my words "opinion about the Marine Shooting", and insert your words "called me a liar", highlighting them as a quote by me. I supose that is telling the truth to you, inserting words creatively that I never said??? Or just inserting things like the Marines were laughing, or other details not consistant with storming a building.
If I'm a prick, its because I question versions of inturpetations that are full of inconsistant statements, not to mention your total lack of remorse for YOUR ONLY detail, smearing the reputations of Marines on the World Wide Internet. You seem to be intent on protecting your own reputation on the board, by calling me a prick becasue you got caught lying. The last thing you are concerned with is the damgage you did to these Marines, with the thankless job of weeding these people out of buildings in close range combat.