The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

The War on Terrorism & Homeland Security

ISRAEL'S DIRTY SECRET

Discuss the War on Terrorism, Homeland Security, Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea and other global terrorist concerns.

Postby rath » Tue May 19, 2009 4:13 am

Date: 17th March 2003

Which country in the Middle East has undeclared Nuclear weapons?

Which country in the Middle East has undeclared biological and chemical capabilities?

Which country in the Middle East has no outside inspections?

Which country jailed its nuclear whistleblower for 19 years?




ISRAEL'S SECRET WEAPON



17th March 2003



Olenka Frenkiel: Meet the Eoloffs. Five years ago they adopted a man they'd never met who writes to them from a prison cell in Israel.

My dearest Nick and Mary, I am very glad to hear from you so soon. About the next parole hearing I don't know what will happen. We've passed a long time in a very bad cruel condition.

We will see what the U.S. is going to do with Iraq, if they'll go to war.

Olenka Frenkiel: The man they adopted is Mordechai Vanunu, jailed as a traitor. He spent eleven years in solitary confinement.

Mary Eoloff: He was buried alive. He was shut up in a six by nine-foot cell with no windows so he couldn't see outside. Even when he exercised there was a canvas around him when he was out walking.

Nick Eoloff: He has spent more time in isolation in a prison in the western world than any other human being. It was that bad. His condition was that bad. And that was what really moved us to adopt him. How can a country treat a human being that way?

Olenka Frenkiel: Vanunu moved to Israel as a child with his family from Morocco. He served in the Israeli army, studied philosophy, and found work at Dimona.

Olenka Frenkiel: This mysterious complex in the Negev desert employed thousands of people all sworn to secrecy. For years Israel called it a textile factory, never admitting its true purpose; making plutonium for bombs.

Olenka Frenkiel: Vanunu's dissent over government policies was noted. He was given a warning and decided to leave.

Olenka Frenkiel: But not without the evidence which would change history. Today his are still the only photographs ever seen of the inside of Israel's nuclear bomb factory.

Olenka Frenkiel: It's 16 years since Sunday Times journalist Peter Hounam heard rumours that an Israeli whistleblower was offering proof of what the world had long suspected.

PETER HOUNAM, Freelance Journalist: Here was someone who said he'd worked right inside the plutonium separation plant helping to fabricate atomic weapons; who had taken photographs of the machinery and who had lots of information about how much material was being processed, and so on.

Peter Hounam: Therefore he was potentially going to be able to provide incontrovertible evidence that Israel had a very advanced programme.

Olenka Frenkiel: Hounam flew to meet Vanunu, who was now a Christian living in Australia.

Olenka Frenkiel: He was brought to England. He was hidden in a country hotel and smuggled into the paper's offices in the boot of the car while they checked his story.

Olenka Frenkiel: But Israeli intelligence agents caught here on Wapping's security cameras were onto him. They were waiting to strike.

Olenka Frenkiel: It took weeks for The Sunday Times to go to press with their scoop. When they finally did on Oct 5th 1986 Vanunu had vanished.


Olenka Frenkiel: He'd (Vanunu) met an American woman in Leicester Square who seemed to like him. He was vulnerable and afraid.

Olenka Frenkiel: When she suggested he'd be safer with her in Rome, he fell for it. It was a classic honey trap.

Olenka Frenkiel: Once in Rome the full weight of Israel's wrath kicked in. Vanunu was overpowered, assaulted and drugged.

Image

Olenka Frenkiel: He'd been kidnapped and smuggled back to Israel by boat, unconscious. For weeks no one knew where he was.

Olenka Frenkiel: Eventually the Israelis brought Vanunu to court for a secret trial. They now admitted they had him but still no one knew how he'd got there.

Olenka Frenkiel: His kidnap - an illegal act on foreign soil - was kept secret. Somehow Vanunu found a pen and solved the mystery for the waiting press.

Olenka Frenkiel: He wrote on his hand, Hijacked in Rome thirtieth of September 1986.

Image

Olenka Frenkiel: It was Shimon Peres, then Prime Minister, who had ordered Vanunu's capture. To this day the kidnap remains an official state secret. Peres was the father of Israel's secret nuclear programme and for him Vanunu was a spy.

Shimon Peres: He was a traitor to this country.

Olenka Frenkiel: So what was your reaction?

Shimon Peres: Very negative.

Olenka Frenkiel: What did you do?

Shimon Peres: What I thought should be done.

Olenka Frenkiel: Which was what?

Shimon Peres: To put him to trial.

Olenka Frenkiel: Kidnap him?

SHIMON PERES, Former Prime Minister: My lady, I can't go into all the processes. I am unwilling. I don't see any reason to do so. The fact is that he was brought to trial.

Olenka Frenkiel: Vanunu's trial was held in secret. He was found guilty of treason and espionage and sentenced to eighteen years in jail.

AVIGDOR FELDMAN, Mordechai Vanunu's lawyer: Vanunu was treated this way out of revenge out of a way to deter others and because actually he was the person who broke the taboo of the secrecy in Israeli society, a very strong and influencing taboo in a very closed society more like a tribe.

Olenka Frenkiel: Mordechai Vanunu started his sentence on the twenty seventh of March 1988. Few tears were shed. For most Israelis he was more than a traitor. He had rejected Judaism.

Olenka Frenkiel: His parents declared him dead. And the world forgot about Israel's nuclear whistleblower. But the truth was out.

Peter Hounam: Vanunu told the world that Israel had developed between one hundred and two hundred atomic bombs and had gone on to develop neutron bombs and thermonuclear weapons. Enough to destroy the entire Middle East and nobody has done anything about it since.

Olenka Frenkiel: Today, proliferation experts report Israel has the world's sixth largest nuclear arsenal with small tactical nuclear weapons, nuclear landmines as well as medium range nuclear missiles launchable from air, land or sea.

Olenka Frenkiel: It's thought plutonium is made in Dimona; nuclear weapons are assembled at Yodefat and stored at Zachariah and Eilabun. Three nuclear submarines are based in Haifa and Israel's biological and chemical warfare laboratories are at Nes Ziona.

Olenka Frenkiel: Israel never comments on such reports.

Olenka Frenkiel: But evidence continues to emerge. In 1992 an Israeli cargo plane crashed in Amsterdam killing forty-three people.

Olenka Frenkiel: The Israelis claimed it was carrying flowers and perfume. It took six years and a Dutch parliamentary enquiry before they admitted it was carrying DMMP, a key component for sarin nerve gas.

Olenka Frenkiel: The DMMP was bound for The Israeli Institute of Biological Research at Nes Ziona, one of Israel's most secret defence sites. It is subject to no international inspection and reporting of its activities in Israel is prevented by strict military censorship.

Olenka Frenkiel: As war has loomed closer small signs of dissent have appeared on the suburban streets of Middle America. Nick and Mary Eoloff have been peace campaigners since the Vietnam War and the draft.

Mary Eoloff: The definition of a conscientious objector is someone who sincerely objects to participation in all forms of war. There are two words that are extremely important in that definition: "sincere" and "all".

Olenka Frenkiel: Fear that the draft may return has lead a new generation to the local church hall to hear how, if they're called up to fight, they can claim their right to say no.

Olenka Frenkiel: For the Eoloffs, Mordechai Vanunu is the ultimate conscientious objector. When they first visited him in 1997 it was his eleventh year in solitary confinement.

MARY & NICK EOLOFF, Mordechai Vanunu's adoptive parents: And we waited and they brought him in and he looked like an old man. I didn't anticipate that. And he came up to us and he put his fingers through the bars through the cage, because it was a steel cage. We were crying. We felt so awful to see him like this.

Olenka Frenkiel: Vanunu writes regularly. It is the only communication he is allowed with the outside world. But his letters take months to arrive and are always censored.

Mary Eoloff: He says, don't feel so bad, we can bear another year.

Nick Eoloff: My, what courage!

Mary Eoloff: The early letters that we got were totally cut out. This isn't even an example because they were cut out more than that, this. They use a highlighter and then they bring it to Mordechai, and he has to cut out the things they've highlighted.

Mary Eoloff: One time, he said they weren't paying attention. And so he just put the pieces in the envelope and we got them, because we said, you know, we got the pieces, and they're really not even significant. I think it's control, total control.

Olenka Frenkiel: Today Jerusalem is a ghost town, drained of life. Israel's nuclear weapons have proved useless in its latest war. The suicide bombers have frightened the tourists away. The economy has collapsed.

Olenka Frenkiel: Israelis have learnt to live with war. Every citizen gets a gas mask, is taught how to use it and is expected to have it ready in case of attack.

Olenka Frenkiel: Nuclear weapons are seen as a justifiable deterrent by most Israelis, who feel besieged by enemies.

Olenka Frenkiel: Forty years ago Uzi Even, then a young scientist at Dimona was in at the start of Israel's bomb.

Professor UZI EVEN, Dimona scientist, 1962-68: We were a very small country, and we were surrounded by much much larger, more populous states on borders that are almost impossible to defend. The holocaust was very much in our memory at that time, and we all realised that we have to do something to prevent the same scenario from happening again.

Uzi Even: So we were a young crew, most of us very young, very enthusiastic, working on something we believed is essential for our existence, like building the final insurance policy that we will not be attacked or terminated.

Olenka Frenkiel: It was the young Shimon Peres, back in the fifties who negotiated a secret deal with the French to buy a nuclear weapons reactor like theirs.

Olenka Frenkiel: But while Dimona was going up, intelligence reports reached Washington that Israel was building an atom bomb.

Olenka Frenkiel: Despite claims that Dimona was for peaceful purposes only, Israel's leader Ben Gurion was summoned to Washington. President Kennedy feared an arms race in the Middle East and demanded inspections.

Olenka Frenkiel: But when inspectors finally entered the plant in May 1961 they were tricked. They were shown a fake control room on the ground floor. They were unaware of the six floors below where the plutonium was made.

PETER HOUNAM, Freelance journalist: Well this was something of great pride and almost a legendary story in Dimona, according to Vanunu. When the Americans came they were completely hoodwinked.

Peter Hounam: All the entrances including the lift shafts were bricked up and plastered over so it was impossible for anyone to find their way down to the lower floors.

Olenka Frenkiel: After Kennedy's assassination the pressure on Israel was off. His successor Lyndon Johnson turned a blind eye.

Olenka Frenkiel: Then In 1969 Israel's Golda Meir and President Richard Nixon struck a deal, renewed by every President to this day. Israel's nuclear programme could continue as long as it was never made public. It's called nuclear ambiguity.

Olenka Frenkiel: The term nuclear ambiguity, in some ways it sounds very grand. But isn't just a euphemism for deception?

SHIMON PERES, Former Prime Minister: If somebody wants to kill you, and you use a deception to save your life it is not immoral. If we wouldn't have enemies we wouldn't need deceptions. We wouldn't need deterrent.

Olenka Frenkiel: Was this the justification for concealing the floors of the plutonium reprocessing areas from the Americans, the inspectors, when they came?

Shimon Peres: You are having a dialogue with yourself, not with me.

Olenka Frenkiel: But that's been documented in a number of books.

Shimon Peres: Ask the question to yourself, not to me.

Olenka Frenkiel: I mean, Is it not true?

Shimon Peres: I don't have to answer your questions even. I don't see any reason why.

Olenka Frenkiel: Ambiguity is a luxury unique to Israel. Today the country's an inspection-free zone, protected from scrutiny by America and her allies.

Ronen Bergman: This is the place where Vanunu identified as the separation plant, built mostly underground. And this is the silver dome of the Dimona nuclear reactor.

Olenka Frenkiel: Ronen Bergman is an Israeli journalist specialising in security and defence.

Ronen Bergman: This picture was taken by one of the best commercial satellites available called Ikonos, and Ikonos is capable of taking pictures up to a resolution of one metre.

RONEN BERGMAN, Journalist, "Yediot Ahronot": However due to the demand of Israel the American Congress ruled a new amendment to the law that forbids American satellites to sell anything of Israeli sites that is better than two metres, meaning the Ikonos is taking imagery of Israel. Then they change the imagery to the resolution of two metres.

Olenka Frenkiel: Worse, less clear?

Ronen Bergman: Much much less clear.

Olenka Frenkiel: And that was a ruling in the United States that's specifically for Israel, not for other countries.

Ronen Bergman: Only to Israel.

Olenka Frenkiel: Last November there were signs of a softening towards Vanunu. The authorities allowed pictures to be taken at his parole hearing. Parole itself has always been refused. Vanunu still has secrets, the prosecutor claims, that could harm Israel. It's an argument his lawyer will have to fight at the next hearing.

Olenka Frenkiel: Will the court hear the secret that they claim Vanunu holds?

AVIGDOR FELDMAN, Mordechai Vanunu's lawyer: They will hear some of the secrets, not the real secrets. They will hear secrets about the secrets.

Olenka Frenkiel: And you too, as his lawyer, will hear those?

Avigdor Feldman: Part of it. Less that the court. The court will hear the secrets about the secrets. I may hear the secrets about the secrets about the secrets.

Olenka Frenkiel: Is that really the case, or is that a sort of ironic...?

Avigdor Feldman: No, it's really the case. I will be given some type of general description of the secrets. The court will get something more concrete and the secrets themselves will be never released to anybody, they exist at all.

Olenka Frenkiel: Nick and Mary Eoloff have arrived in Israel. They hope to visit Vanunu in prison but they haven't yet got permission.

Mary Eoloff: Oh gosh, any news?

Rayna Moss: Not yet. Not good news. Not yet.

Olenka Frenkiel: Rayna Moss is one of a small group of Israelis campaigning for Vanunu's release. She's been hassling the prison authorities for weeks to get Nick and Mary the necessary permissions.

Rayna Moss: What she says now is that they have approval from one authority but she's waiting for approval from a second authority.

Nick Eoloff: Do they clearly understand our time limitation that we're due to be leaving on Friday?

Rayna Moss: Oh absolutely. I made that absolutely clear to them. I said that you're leaving on Friday, that you've already been here for a couple of days.

Mary Eoloff: Well I appreciate you making all these calls, Rayna.

Mary Eoloff: Oh it's nothing. I don't mind. I just wish I had good news for you.

Olenka Frenkiel: Forty-year-old reactors are usually shut down, but Dimona grinds on. Dimona is under the control of the Prime Minister, beyond the reach of Parliament or public scrutiny.

Olenka Frenkiel: And that worries the scientist who once worked there so optimistically.

UZI EVEN, Dimona scientist, 1962-68: As the reactor gets older the tendency to have accidents becomes more probable. You should have an outside watchdog and the secrecy more or less created an ex- territorial area in Israel where standard procedures of safety monitoring is not implemented.

Uzi Even: So, worker safety, environmental questions, industrial safety procedures, all are not covered and there are thousands of people working there.

Olenka Frenkiel: But the secrets of this old reactor are beginning to leak.

Olenka Frenkiel: Evidence has seeped out of accidents, lies and deceit.

Olenka Frenkiel: In 1996 the press heard rumours of a radioactive hotspot in the desert. The Environment Minister took them to watch him test the site with a Geiger counter. They weren't allowed to bring their own, one journalist told me.

Olenka Frenkiel: The Minister proclaimed the site clean. The readings for radioactivity, his instrument showed, were below normal.

Olenka Frenkiel: But journalists weren't happy.

Journalist, Subtitles: What worries us is the disposal of the waste. Can you please tell us where it is buried?

YOSSI SARID, Environment Minister, 1992-96, Subtitles: In a good place. I am being honest with you... I would lose my job if I told you where the nuclear waste is buried. The Prime Minister considers this information to be classified.

Olenka Frenkiel: But on Israeli television last year, a groundbreaking documentary alleged it was a cover-up.

Olenka Frenkiel: Ariel Spieler, a holocaust survivor and a loyal Dimona worker for 27 years, described how he had been told to prepare the site for the Minister's visit by removing contaminated waste from a deep crater.

Olenka Frenkiel: He said he'd replaced it with fresh soil and planted trees to cover the hole as though it had never happened. Then he said they brought the minister and the press to prove that everything was okay.

Olenka Frenkiel: Five Dimona workers appeared on the programme. They'd given their lives for Dimona, they said, and now they felt betrayed.

Olenka Frenkiel: They broke no secrets. Only the code of silence.

Olenka Frenkiel: They said they'd worked with uranium. There were fires, spills, and explosions of toxic gas.

Olenka Frenkiel: Now they were sick, they said, the plant didn't want to know. The management was denying they'd worked with radioactive materials, and because they were bound to secrecy they couldn't fight for their rights.

Olenka Frenkiel: The programme listed more than a hundred Dimona workers who'd developed cancer and whose claims were being ignored.

Olenka Frenkiel: A doctor and two lawyers backed their story.

Olenka Frenkiel: It was the first time Dimona workers had spoken out.

Olenka Frenkiel: I want to talk to Ariel Spieler. He's suffering from cancer and in the last few years he's seen a number of his friends and colleagues who worked there with him die of the disease.

Olenka Frenkiel: He's been fighting for compensation for their families, for their widows, and I know he'd really like to talk to us about this.

Olenka Frenkiel: He's told me he wishes he could, but he's also told me he's been warned off. He's been told not to talk. I'm going to go and see him and see if he'll change his mind.

Secret filming

Olenka Frenkiel: I just wanted to ask you, you know, why you can't?

Ariel Spieler, Subtitles: The Secret Service silenced me. They've silenced me completely. They told me not to say one word. What can I do? What can I do?

Ariel Spieler, Subtitles: They told me; "You'll end up like Vanunu". How long has he been in prison? 15 years? Do you want me to go to jail? I really wanted to talk. I asked the others but they refused. Nobody wants to talk.

Olenka Frenkiel: It was time to try the others: The doctors, the relatives, the lawyers.

Voice One: Hello?

Olenka Frenkiel: Hello. I just wanted to ask if there would be any possibility of doing an interview with you about the cancer victims and about their case?

Voice One: I'm really reluctant to be interviewed publicly on the media over the story overseas. It's just not appropriate.

Olenka Frenkiel: But why is it so sensitive?

Voice One: Come on now. Any discussion of nuclear issues is sensitive.

Voice Two: I talked to my family. I don't want to participate in this. I don't think it's the right thing to do.

Olenka Frenkiel: Nobody is prepared to talk about it.

Voice Three: There are things that it's not good to talk about, even if you're a lawyer.

Olenka Frenkiel: Are you worried about a sort of Vanunu scenario?

Voice Three: Of course! You think about it.

Olenka Frenkiel: I just don't get it. If this was the Soviet Union or Iraq or North Korea I'd understand why people are so scared to talk.

Olenka Frenkiel: But this is Israel. This is supposed to be a democracy.

Olenka Frenkiel: In Israel today, an invisible power enforces the code of silence - through fear. It comes from one man, whose own identity was itself a secret until two years ago, Yehiyel Horev.

RONEN BERGMAN, Journalist, "Yediot Ahronot": Horev is the smartest, most brilliant official figure in the sense of getting power. He took some kind of very small office and made it the fourth intelligence agency in Israel, with no law, no real scrutiny and monitoring by the Israeli Parliament.

Ronen Bergman: In this sense he is a grave danger to Israeli democracy.

Olenka Frenkiel: For sixteen years Horev has been the faceless guardian of Israel's secrets. His picture has never been published unmasked till now.

Olenka Frenkiel: It's Horev from his office at the Ministry of Defence who is blocking Vanunu's early release.

Olenka Frenkiel: But next year Vanunu's sentence is up. So Horev found a new Vanunu, Brigadier-General Yitzhak Yaakov, known to his friends as Yatsa. In his retirement he wrote a fictionalised memoir and talked on camera about his life.

Olenka Frenkiel: A distinguished soldier and scientist, Yaakov had for years led Israel's top-secret weapons development programme.

Olenka Frenkiel: So eminent was he, he was a candidate for the prestigious Israel Prize.

Olenka Frenkiel: But when he told his life story to a journalist, he broke the rules.

Olenka Frenkiel: The journalist was Ronen Bergman. He showed his article, as all Israelis must, to the censor.

Olenka Frenkiel: It went straight to Horev - who sent in the heavies.

Ronen Bergman: They were deadly deadly serious. My phones were bugged. I was followed by Israeli Secret Service, Yaakov was followed by Israeli Secret Service, and the whole system was surrounding us and following us and stalking us.

Olenka Frenkiel: Yaakov went from hero to zero. He was arrested secretly and charged with treason. He spent two years fighting Horev. Two years of jail, heart disease, bankruptcy and house arrest ended in public disgrace.

Olenka Frenkiel: He was spared prison, but the court found him guilty of betraying Israel's secrets.

Ronen Bergman: Horev was afraid that veterans of the Israeli army, the Israeli intelligence, the Israeli nuclear effort, would try to maintain their footprint in the history of Israel and tell their story.

Ronen Bergman: And he wanted to frighten them. In this sense he was successful.

Olenka Frenkiel: Do you think that there is too much secrecy? The power of somebody like Horev to destroy the life of an individual like this Brigadier-General Yaakov, for example. The man's life had been destroyed and he'd been a very loyal Israeli all his life.

SHIMON PERES, Former Prime Minister: It happens unfortunately in life, of false accusations, and some innocent people are paying the high cost.

Shimon Peres: I cannot see how can it be avoidable.

Olenka Frenkiel: Israel's parliament had never debated Dimona or nuclear weapons, until one MP three years ago forced them onto the agenda for the first time.

Olenka Frenkiel: Issam Makhoul an Israeli Arab broken the taboo - to the outrage of his colleagues.

Issam Makhoul, Subtitles: Vanunu is not the problem. The problem is the Israeli government's policy. A policy that's turned a small territory into a poisonous nuclear waste bin... which could make us all disappear into a nuclear cloud.

Olenka Frenkiel: These words uttered in the heart of Israel's democracy were seen by his fellow MPs as a sacrilege.

Issam Makhoul, Subtitles: The entire world knows that Israel is a vast nuclear, biological... and chemical warehouse that is used as an anchor... for the nuclear arms race in the middle east.

Olenka Frenkiel: He wasn't allowed to finish his speech, but he had made his point.

Olenka Frenkiel: But in his constituency during the recent election campaign it was a different story. Here his audience are - like him - Israeli Arabs.

Issam Makhoul, Subtitles: Why are the Americans looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? I can tell them where there are weapons of mass destruction... including nuclear weapons.

Issam Makhoul, Subtitles: They are in Dimona, in Haifa Bay in the Eilabun mountain... and in the area of Sakneen, Yolfhata. Let them send their inspectors to me... and I will lead them by the hand and show them.

Olenka Frenkiel: There is a cry going up which is talking about a double standard. The world has to check Iraq's nuclear installations but not Israel's.

Shimon Peres: How can you compare it? Iraq is a dictatorship. Saddam Hussein is a killer. He killed a hundred thousand Kurds with gas bombs. How can you compare that at all?

Shimon Peres: Just because he calls himself a state? He's not a state - he's a Mafia. He's not a leader - he's a killer. You cannot say that about us.

Olenka Frenkiel: But even in Israel some do. The current Prime Minister Ariel Sharon directed the invasion of Lebanon in 1982. Thousands of innocent civilians were killed.

Olenka Frenkiel: The worst excesses were in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila, for which an Israeli enquiry held Sharon personally responsible. In Belgium there are plans to prosecute him for alleged war crimes.

Olenka Frenkiel: While Sharon has been Prime Minister seven hundred Israelis have been killed. But more than two thousand Palestinians have died in attacks by Israeli soldiers.

Olenka Frenkiel: The Israeli army has used new unidentified weapons. In February 2001, a new gas was used in Gaza. A hundred and eighty patients were admitted to hospitals with severe convulsions.

Voiceover: The Israelis say this is tear gas. But this is not tear gas. We have never seen this gas before. We need some medicine for treatment. But it must be the right medicine.

Dr MOHAMMED SALAMA, Director, Palestinian Health Ministry: We asked, what kind of gas? But nobody verified for us the type of gas to give the antidote at that moment. Also we don't know how to check, how to examine, how to send this. We are in occupied area. We are surrounded. It is impossible to send these samples to international lab to test.

Olenka Frenkiel: Israel is outside chemical and biological weapons treaties and still refuses to say what the new gas was.

Olenka Frenkiel: The Eoloffs have still not heard from the prison. Their flight home is tomorrow night and they worry they may have to leave without seeing their adopted son.

Olenka Frenkiel: Today they are having lunch with a small group of activists who for sixteen years have fought in vain for Vanunu's release.

First Israeli activist: They pressurise Iraq about nuclear weapons. What about Israel and nuclear weapons?

Second Israeli activist: Imagine for one moment that Mordechai Vanunu was not an Israeli, that the whole story had happened with a Korean or an Iranian or a Pakistani technician, he would have had the Nobel Peace Prize. He would have been the second Sakharov.

Second Israeli activist: Instead he is a non-person in the West. This tells you what we are dealing with. We're dealing with the number one privileged state on earth.

Third Israeli activist: Counter to the Israeli argument that the whole world is against us, it is the exact opposite. We started the nuclear race in the Middle East. There is no doubt about it.

Third Israeli activist: And there is not even one important state in the Western Hemisphere who is dealing with it seriously.

Rayna Moss: You can talk all we want. We can sit until tomorrow morning and discuss Israel's nuclear policy. We can discuss whatever we want. It's the people who work in those areas, with weapons of mass destruction, the environment, Dimona itself, all these research places.

Rayna Moss: Vanunu is a living warning to them. This is what will happen to you if you speak out. You'll be Vanunu-nised. That's the warning. You will spend ten years in solitary confinement.

Rayna Moss: You will be cut off from all your family. You will be cut off from everyone who knows you. You will be this prisoner without a number and without a name. That's what will happen to you if you speak out.

Olenka Frenkiel: It's the prison on the phone.

Mary Eoloff: Hello? Oh how marvellous! What time? Well, if we come at eleven, can we have an hour and a half? Okay. Thank you so much. Okay. Bye.

Olenka Frenkiel: On their last day the Eoloffs get their visit. After an hour and a half they emerge with a message.

Mary Eoloff: It's just wonderful. We're so excited we don't know what to think. All right, you talk.

Nick Eoloff: It was a marvellous experience. It was the first time we've seen him so high and just anxious to talk about what's going on in his life and what he's looking forward to. Especially the anticipation of getting out.

Nick Eoloff: He's just strong. That was his final word: "Let them know that I'm strong and anxious to get out of here, out of Israel and just start life all over again". And he was just beaming.

Mary Eoloff: And he said the message to world is the message to the world is that I have forgotten the last sixteen years. I'm looking towards the future. I believe in a future of non- violence.

Olenka Frenkiel: So did he say that he'd do it all again?

Mary Eoloff: You know, he did. He said, of course I would. Isn't that incredible?

Olenka Frenkiel: The Eoloffs have gone, and Vanunu is again up for parole. But as usual everything, even the location of the parole hearing, is secret.

Secret filming

Olenka Frenkiel: Apart from me and Peter Hounam, who has come from London, there are no other journalists here.

Peter Hounam: Mordechai Vanunu? Mordechai Vanunu? Is he in there?

Olenka Frenkiel: Mordechai Vanunu is in there? Is that where the case is being held?

PETER HOUNAM, Freelance journalist: He is the most sensitive prisoner that this country has got, and whenever he comes here they block off the windows of his van if they can, or they, in the early days they used to put a crash helmet over him so people couldn't see him.

Peter Hounam: At one point they even had an electronic device that emitted a screeching signal so people couldn't hear him speak.

Olenka Frenkiel: And yet you and I are the only journalists here. The most sensitive prisoner Israel has got, and there's not a single member of the press here apart from you. Why do you keep coming?

Peter Hounam: I keep coming because he's in there because he spoke to me and we published his story on the Sunday Times in 1986, and I feel a sense of responsibility that we should be helping him get out.

Olenka Frenkiel: Three hours later the hearing ended. As usual Vanunu left behind darkened windows. In court Horev's prosecutor had cited the war with Iraq as a new reason for blocking parole.

AVIGDOR FELDMAN, Mordechai Vanunu's lawyer: The prosecutor of course went back to the old argument that Vanunu is a threat to security and she even said that if Vanunu will be released, probably the Americans would leave Iraq and go after Israel and Israel's nuclear weapons, which I found extremely ridiculous.

Olenka Frenkiel: Minnesota, the Peace Bridge and a weekly ritual. Every Wednesday hundreds protest against the war.

Olenka Frenkiel: Mary is there. So of course is Nick. Every week the numbers grow. There is a new generation of peaceniks who were children when Israel's nuclear weapons were exposed.

Olenka Frenkiel: Have any of you guys heard of Mordechai Vanunu?

Protesters: No.

Olenka Frenkiel: You don't know who he is.

Olenka Frenkiel: And if I tell you that he's somebody who exposed Israel's weapons of mass destruction, which nobody knew about until then, what would you say?

Protester: One Why is our media that's supposed to be free and open not telling us and why is our government not letting us know this information if we're living in the home of the free?

Protester Two: I think if our administration was consistent or had any integrity, then he would be held as a hero.

President George W. Bush: We're going to work with the members of the Security Council in the days ahead to make it clear to Saddam that the demands of the world and the United Nations will be enforced.

Olenka Frenkiel: In Washington, which gives Israel more than three billion dollars a year, the talk is only of Iraq. For weeks we've tried to get an interview about Israel's weapons of mass destruction, but no one in this Bush administration wants to talk about Israel.

Olenka Frenkiel: So we've asked for an interview about the military balance of power in the Middle East. And now they've agreed.

Olenka Frenkiel: This morning we've finally been told that we're going to have an interviewee. He's an expert in all matters Israeli. He's an Under Secretary of Defense, and his name is Douglas Feith.

Olenka Frenkiel: The Pentagon has demanded a list of questions in advance. So, it's "The balance of power", "Israel's nuclear ambiguity", "Allegations of a double standard" and "Mordechai Vanunu".

President George W. Bush: The gravest danger facing America and the world is outlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

Olenka Frenkiel: Yet again the shutters have come down on this story. Our interview with Under Secretary for Defense Douglas Feith was scheduled for four o'clock somewhere in this vast complex of the Pentagon behind me. Yet at the last minute we've heard the interview is cancelled.

Olenka Frenkiel: Questions about Israel, it appears, are strictly off-limits.

Olenka Frenkiel: We'd received this e-mail from the Pentagon.

Voiceover: Subtitles. Ladies: We showed Mr Feith the list of topics for the BBC interview. He is not willing to answer any of the questions you listed... Respectfully request you resubmit your questions as soon as possible this morning. Questions directed towards the current Iraqi situation.

Olenka Frenkiel: On February nineteenth Vanunu was again refused parole. He remains in Ashkelon prison.

Olenka Frenkiel: Horev has let it be known he intends never to let Mordechai Vanunu leave Israel.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordechai_Vanunu

Israel to lobby ABC over nerve gas documentary

July 1 2003

The Israeli government will lobby Australia's national broadcaster to ditch plans to screen a controversial BBC documentary on the Jewish state.

The program, Israel's Secret Weapon, asserts that Israel has used nerve gas against Palestinians and possesses an arsenal of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

ABC Television today said the program would be screened but it had not yet been scheduled.

Israel's ambassador to Australia, Gaby Levy, said he would ask the ABC to reconsider airing the program.

Head of Israel's government press service, Daniel Seaman, said the BBC program bordered on Nazi propaganda and anti-Semitism.

Israeli officials have been banned from appearing on the BBC as a result of the program and visa restrictions have been imposed on BBC journalists.

But Mr Levy said no such action would be taken against the ABC because it was not involved in the documentary's production.

"I'm going to of course appeal to the ABC and tell them what our arguments are for them to reconsider (screening) it," Mr Levy told AAP.

"We're not going to take any measures simultaneously with what we're doing with the BBC in Israel, it's not the same."

Mr Levy said the program demonised Israel and was the latest chapter in the BBC's anti-Israel campaign.

"The thrust of the program was demonising Israel by presenting and portraying it as a pariah state, a country of the axis of evil if you want," he said.

"Every country has a right to have secrets if they belong to its own security, self-defence and so on."

A publicist with ABC TV said it was not known when the documentary would be aired.

"It's definitely in our system, we will be showing it, we just don't know when," she said.

AAP
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby Nesaie » Tue May 19, 2009 9:57 pm

One secret? :lol:

I was at a pub one night, my local pub, and met an Israeli. After several nights of him coming into my pub and us talking, I mentioned the fact that Israel had nukes. He laughed. He said that everyone in Israel knew they had nukes. He even drew me a map and pointed out where they were located. But, then he followed it up with, "but Israel would never use them, look as which countries they'd bomb, the fallout would come back to Israel". After a few days of talking to him, I scared him from that pub, and there have been other Israelis I've scared away from my pubs since. ;) Now, back then I understood not nuking too close from home from people who believed in human life. But today, I no longer believe that the government of Israel cares for human life. I'd compare them with the government of China.

Yes we all know, Israel has nukes.

We also all know that Haliburton, Cheney's former company, also sold nuclear technology to Iran. It has to do will being able to find oil underground, or so the excuse to sell it to them claims, but it also is a piece to the puzzle of putting together a nuclear bomb.

Oh yeah, wasn't it the US who also gave the information to Israel about nuclear technology? Don't Israeli's claim themselves to be so intellectual and scientific? If they were, and if they added so much to society, then why are they so dependent on American money and science? Oh yeah, they're lazy Theocratical Socialists....I forgot.
Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen... - Zbigniew Brezhinsky
User avatar
Nesaie
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby greeney2 » Tue May 19, 2009 11:45 pm

Amazing the conspiracys you solve right down there at the Pub. :roll:
greeney2
 
Posts: 9574
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby Nesaie » Wed May 20, 2009 12:00 am

I've run a couple of Israelis out of my pubs.

I've also never claimed a conspiracy with regards to this thread. I can back my words. ;)

But, Haliburton really did sell a piece of the nuclear puzzle to Iran...wanna link?

Oh pleeaaazzz...Nevermind...I'm bored.

BTW, I'm back in your city again. I still can't find anything good about it.

Here is one link: http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stor ... s-to-iran/

2. Halliburton Charged with Selling Nuclear Technologies to Iran
Bookmark and Share
in Top 25 Censored Stories for 2007

Source: Global Research.ca, August 5, 2005, Title: “Halliburton Secretly Doing Business With Key Member of Iran’s Nuclear Team,” Author: Jason Leopold

Faculty Evaluator: Catherine Nelson
Student Researchers: Kristine Medeiros and Pla Herr

According to journalist Jason Leopold, sources at former Cheney company Halliburton allege that, as recently as January of 2005, Halliburton sold key components for a nuclear reactor to an Iranian oil development company. Leopold says his Halliburton sources have intimate knowledge of the business dealings of both Halliburton and Oriental Oil Kish, one of Iran’s largest private oil companies.

Additionally, throughout 2004 and 2005, Halliburton worked closely with Cyrus Nasseri, the vice chairman of the board of directors of Iran-based Oriental Oil Kish, to develop oil projects in Iran. Nasseri is also a key member of Iran’s nuclear development team. Nasseri was interrogated by Iranian authorities in late July 2005 for allegedly providing Halliburton with Iran’s nuclear secrets. Iranian government officials charged Nasseri with accepting as much as $1 million in bribes from Halliburton for this information.

Oriental Oil Kish dealings with Halliburton first became public knowledge in January 2005 when the company announced that it had subcontracted parts of the South Pars gas-drilling project to Halliburton Products and Services, a subsidiary of Dallas-based Halliburton that is registered to the Cayman Islands. Following the announcement, Halliburton claimed that the South Pars gas field project in Tehran would be its last project in Iran. According to a BBC report, Halliburton, which took thirty to forty million dollars from its Iranian operations in 2003, “was winding down its work due to a poor business environment.”

However, Halliburton has a long history of doing business in Iran, starting as early as 1995, while Vice President Cheney was chief executive of the company. Leopold quotes a February 2001 report published in the Wall Street Journal, “Halliburton Products and Services Ltd., works behind an unmarked door on the ninth floor of a new north Tehran tower block. A brochure declares that the company was registered in 1975 in the Cayman Islands, is based in the Persian Gulf sheikdom of Dubai and is “non-American.” But like the sign over the receptionist’s head, the brochure bears the company’s name and red emblem, and offers services from Halliburton units around the world.” Moreover mail sent to the company’s offices in Tehran and the Cayman Islands is forwarded directly to its Dallas headquarters.

In an attempt to curtail Halliburton and other U.S. companies from engaging in business dealings with rogue nations such as Libya, Iran, and Syria, an amendment was approved in the Senate on July 26, 2005. The amendment, sponsored by Senator Susan Collins R-Maine, would penalize companies that continue to skirt U.S. law by setting up offshore subsidiaries as a way to legally conduct and avoid U.S. sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

A letter, drafted by trade groups representing corporate executives, vehemently objected to the amendment, saying it would lead to further hatred and perhaps incite terrorist attacks on the U.S. and “greatly strain relations with the United States primary trading partners.” The letter warned that, “Foreign governments view U.S. efforts to dictate their foreign and commercial policy as violations of sovereignty often leading them to adopt retaliatory measures more at odds with U.S. goals.”

Collins supports the legislation, stating, “It prevents U.S. corporations from creating a shell company somewhere else in order to do business with rogue, terror-sponsoring nations such as Syria and Iran. The bottom line is that if a U.S. company is evading sanctions to do business with one of these countries, they are helping to prop up countries that support terrorism—most often aimed against America.
UPDATE BY JASON LEOPOLD

During a trip to the Middle East in March 1996, Vice President Dick Cheney told a group of mostly U.S. businessmen that Congress should ease sanctions in Iran and Libya to foster better relationships, a statement that, in hindsight, is completely hypocritical considering the Bush administration’s foreign policy.

“Let me make a generalized statement about a trend I see in the U.S. Congress that I find disturbing, that applies not only with respect to the Iranian situation but a number of others as well,” Cheney said. “I think we Americans sometimes make mistakes . . . There seems to be an assumption that somehow we know what’s best for everybody else and that we are going to use our economic clout to get everybody else to live the way we would like.”

Cheney was the chief executive of Halliburton Corporation at the time he uttered those words. It was Cheney who directed Halliburton toward aggressive business dealings with Iran—in violation of U.S. law—in the mid-1990s, which continued through 2005 and is the reason Iran has the capability to enrich weapons-grade uranium.

It was Halliburton’s secret sale of centrifuges to Iran that helped get the uranium enrichment program off the ground, according to a three-year investigation that includes interviews conducted with more than a dozen current and former Halliburton employees.

If the U.S. ends up engaged in a war with Iran in the future, Cheney and Halliburton will bear the brunt of the blame.
But this shouldn’t come as a shock to anyone who has been following Halliburton’s business activities over the past decade. The company has a long, documented history of violating U.S. sanctions and conducting business with so-called rogue nations.

No, what’s disturbing about these facts is how little attention it has received from the mainstream media. But the public record speaks for itself, as do the thousands of pages of documents obtained by various federal agencies that show how Halliburton’s business dealings in Iran helped fund terrorist activities there—including the country’s nuclear enrichment program.

When I asked Wendy Hall, a spokeswoman for Halliburton, a couple of years ago if Halliburton would stop doing business with Iran because of concerns that the company helped fund terrorism she said, “No.” “We believe that decisions as to the nature of such governments and their actions are better made by governmental authorities and international entities such as the United Nations as opposed to individual persons or companies,” Hall said. “Putting politics aside, we and our affiliates operate in countries to the extent it is legally permissible, where our customers are active as they expect us to provide oilfield services support to their international operations. “We do not always agree with policies or actions of governments in every place that we do business and make no excuses for their behaviors. Due to the long-term nature of our business and the inevitability of political and social change, it is neither prudent nor appropriate for our company to establish our own country-by-country foreign policy.”

Halliburton first started doing business in Iran as early as 1995, while Vice President Cheney was chief executive of the company and in possible violation of U.S. sanctions.

An executive order signed by former President Bill Clinton in March 1995 prohibits “new investments (in Iran) by U.S. persons, including commitment of funds or other assets.” It also bars U.S. companies from performing services “that would benefit the Iranian oil industry” and provide Iran with the financial means to engage in terrorist activity.

When Bush and Cheney came into office in 2001, their administration decided it would not punish foreign oil and gas companies that invest in those countries. The sanctions imposed on countries like Iran and Libya before Bush became president were blasted by Cheney, who gave frequent speeches on the need for U.S. companies to compete with their foreign competitors, despite claims that those countries may have ties to terrorism.

“I think we’d be better off if we, in fact, backed off those sanctions (on Iran), didn’t try to impose secondary boycotts on companies . . . trying to do business over there . . . and instead started to rebuild those relationships,” Cheney said during a 1998 business trip to Sydney, Australia, according to Australia’s Illawarra Mercury newspaper.


Israel GO HOME!

(I need to add that to my sig)
Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen... - Zbigniew Brezhinsky
User avatar
Nesaie
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby greeney2 » Wed May 20, 2009 3:46 pm

BTW, I'm back in your city again. I still can't find anything good about it.


Now that really hurt my feelings! :lol:
greeney2
 
Posts: 9574
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby Jaack » Wed May 20, 2009 7:36 pm

Which country in the middle east says they are going to use them?

Which country has had them for years and never used or threatened to use them?

Which country would disarm if the other would quit terrorizing them?
What?
User avatar
Jaack
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Google Earth

Postby Nesaie » Wed May 20, 2009 9:44 pm

How can Israel use weapons that they supposedly don't have?

I don't call the Palestinians defending their homeland terrorism. If I did, I'd have to call the Natives terrorists too.

So, the US gave Israel and Iran nuclear technology...ain't that a laugh. :lol:
Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen... - Zbigniew Brezhinsky
User avatar
Nesaie
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby screamzero » Thu May 21, 2009 8:04 am

Which country has Arab citizens welcomed in it; gives them all their due rights and recognizes their language within their borders??
Which country(ies) has/have no Jewish citizens welcomed and wants to mangle 'em?
Which country)ies) has/have tested for the deployment of an EMF weapon?
Which country has not?
:ugeek:
User avatar
screamzero
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Texas, U.S.A.

Postby Nesaie » Sat May 23, 2009 6:45 pm

screamzero wrote:Which country has Arab citizens welcomed in it; gives them all their due rights and recognizes their language within their borders??


All of them, except for Israel. India treats Arabs and Palestinians better than Israel does and they're Hindu.
Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen... - Zbigniew Brezhinsky
User avatar
Nesaie
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby screamzero » Sat May 23, 2009 11:19 pm

Nesaie wrote:
screamzero wrote:Which country has Arab citizens welcomed in it; gives them all their due rights and recognizes their language within their borders??


All of them, except for Israel. India treats Arabs and Palestinians better than Israel does and they're Hindu.

That's a blatant lie.
Israel gives Arabs as much as they want in freedom; speech and education in their
country. PLUS freedom of religion. You WON"T find a comfortable Jew in Iran,
Afghanistan or Egypt; Yemen, Syria, Lebanon
and North Africa...etc ad nauseum. Palestinians in Israel worry about ruining their residency
there -they'd rather NOT live elsewhere in "Palestinian territory".
Your so full of crapola. Far from being mistreated, the Arab
population in Israel and in the territories administered by Israel has been freer than
the population in any Arab state. Arabs in Israel vote. They elect leaders to the Knesset.
They have their own political parties. They have their own newspapers. They have
full rights to citizenship.
They are free to speak their minds. If conditions for Arabs
are so bad in Israel, why is the Arab population exploding -- and I don't mean because
of suicide bombers? Why do Arabs continue to flock to the tiny Jewish state from
virtually every Arab and Muslim land in the world?

ON THE OTHER HAND...

The Jews of Egypt and Libya were expelled while those of Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon
and North Africa left as a result of a coordinated <<--- effort among Arab governments to
create physical and political insecurity. Most were forced to abandon their property. By
2002 these Jews and their descendants constituted about 40% of Israel's population.
These are indigenous Jews. I know...irksome, ain't it?

There are estimates that Jewish property abandoned in Arab countries would be valued
today at more than $300 billion and Jewish-owned real-estate left behind in Arab lands
at 100,000 square kilometers (four times the size of the State of Israel)....thank the Arab League.
Like they reaally give voting rights to Jews. Jews
get ONE choice - convert or die, and then they probably kill 'em anyhow. Show us all a Jew's right to vote in
95% of the Mid East
Arab owned lands. Go ahead. I'll accept one or two examples and gladly stand corrected...
one or two examples. If they exist. Please. Show me. Show us all.

Seem as the oh so venerable and generous Arabs; Iranians; Iraqi and other Arabian
brotherhoods are so very equitable. You prove otherwise w/ a link. Jews Vote in Muslim Countries.
That's the F'n headline I want to see. DO IT. Show us! YOU CAN'T, 'cause it ain't so :!:
They made your day. DIDN'T THEY? gAWeD YOUR HAPPY (SIC). :mrgreen:

On this matter your one twisted psycho ling ling loon. Go ahead and talk to "the other side"
and get your revisionist bullshit history...the greater part of scholastic records contradicts
your blithering "witnessing". Stick your bologna up your nose and Put the drink Down. Your rotting.
User avatar
screamzero
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Texas, U.S.A.

Next

Return to The War on Terrorism & Homeland Security

  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest