ricardo wrote:the time for engagement between Iran and Israel is due. the distant war drums beat and everyone's deaf. cooperation with sea lanes ,drug interdiction and trade are proven topics of discussion.
the holy war siege is hurting the population and pushing Iran into an corner
with little room to manuver. and what are the results of such actions but
Korean, and Pakistan are more of an threat. but to understand them. to engage
one and not all is counterproductive. I have yet to hear of diplomatic efforts between Israel and Iran. direct. any legitimate comments welcome.
ricardo wrote:ok , presidents got a plan . so, it just takes iran to ' stand down
long enough to convince israel , shes well protected, should renegade or other
iranian elements attempt closure of the strait of hormuz.
hence, the presence of american forces. ( neutral zone.)
but we know, iran has stated ' the strait of hormuz ' will remain open.
meanwhile , ex diplomate envoy for the american diplomacy to the middle east,
parenthentically speaking...LINKED PALESTINIAN PROGRESS IN PEACE TALKS
w/ israel, to iranian acquiescence to american , eu, and israelian demands,
that iran stop enriching radioactive material. the fallacy of this arguement is, there was no progress in any former middle east peace talks. this could be american leverage reversed on israel. or, to the benefit of all parties. for talks to move forward. iran is a part of an postive equation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests