by ricardo » Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:30 pm
utilization of aircraft for terrorist actions is nothing new. this method of
using an passenger aircraft to down a building was discussed as a possible
method of attack predates 1985 taught in college anti terr classes and cj courses. ( in America) American movies have more than one flick where an
aircraft does an kamikaze attack into an building. no surprise here.
the implosions seem typical . the heat would have been intense. it wasn't
rocket science. riddle me this. what kind of idiots do we have in this world when some dude says " I want to learn to fly, commercial planes, but not land " and the instructor does nothing. ? WTH !
I do how ever, find suspect the backdrop of twin towers that morning. and an
semi retired news caster on the scene. ( tv) I feel their was an warning , but might have been non specific.
I suppose the suggestion here is this was allowed to happen ? an rallying symbol
like the Alamo , pearl harbor, or false gulf of Tonkin incident. I'm curious . for what purpose? who benefits most. ?
and whom does this