Getting back on the topic of 9/11, I find it hard to believe that the government would be directly involved in the planning of murdering over 3,000 innocent civilians and destroying its primary monetary structures.
Good point and in the beginning I felt the exact same way. It wasn't until 2006 when I stumbled onto some things in regard to 9-11 quite by accident, it's a very long story and I spent twice as long digging into EVERYTHING I could find in regard to the event called 9-11.
The 3,000 figure isn't accurate ( not that it matters ) but 1,456 in all according to European/English News sources died at the twins that day. It's curious as to why so few appear on the US Official death list ( the one used for Social Security benefits ) The OFFICIAL US GOVERNMENT LIST...
Most of those who trumpet the official account use the INCOMPETENCE ANGLE or the LIHOP---Thing.........These were first coined by those who were said to have actual questions in regard to what really happened, who knew, how it was done, ETC---But as time wore on it became very clear that they were merely part of a vast disinfo campaign used as a means of confusing the hell outta honest people who had/have legitimate questions. They fooled the hell out of me until I stopped taking other peoples words for what happened, and why, and started looking for myself, asking for myself.
We already know they knew about a terrorist plan to use planes before 9/11, but maybe they really didn't know exactly when and where.
This was a clever deception-----------a way of selling Planes as the actual means of delivery, yet when you stop and think about real planes, and their flight limits, you should have some serious questions about their actual use within the operation itself.
It's beyond obvious that there were no planes at the Pentagon, or Shanksville--------It's why they moved so quickly to lay the cover stories in regard to both sites. It's exactly why those in charge were quick to ask---" Then where are the planes " " where are the passengers "
Anyway it's a small world and it's best to remember that when speaking of all things 9-11 related >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's better to read and far better to think.
Pick up a copy of Life >>>The 10th anniversary addition of 9-11 it's titled
" In the land of the free "
Sure LIFE is bought and paid for, a product of US Government propaganda------------Yet there is/are verbiage within the Mag that WILL NEVER be used by those on TV...........It's very well worth the read, the Photos are nothing knew accept for a select few new ones, one's I've not seen on line prior to seeing them in the mag.
The Number 1 question that I can NEVER get answered, and know that I never will, is. If fire did the deed then why did the second Tower struck fall first given that most all of it's fuel supply was spent up outside the structure? The follow up is related to the usual response, the response being " well it was struck lower " those who say that are ignorant of the buildings actual construction.........anyway-------if that were indeed the case then the collapse of Tower 2 would have been different than that of Tower 1--------------yet they were clones, almost duplicates of each other.
This question ended up spawning another OFFICIAL THEORY which suggested that the design of the Buildings played a key role in their demise, only that theory fails/failed to explain or account for how they withstood every stress and strain up until the pin pricks, not to mention NYC Building codes and the like-------------
So it stands to reason, at the very very least that SOMEONE, only more than one, had to have had some sort of prior knowledge well in advance of the event itself. There were simply far too many holes to fill in order to EXPLAIN AWAY any and all reasonable questions inn regard to the usual WHO, WHAT, WHEN and WHERE'S of such a monster of an operation...
The end result was far too complicated for it to have been sooooooooooooooooooo very easy that a few Arabs with ZERO Jumbo flying skilz could pull it all together with a few boxcutters. Cole