The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

Government and Political Conspiracies

Woman in the WTC hole inferno (never seen before photos

Throughout time, there have been countless government and political conspiracies that have kept us wondering. This forum is dedicated to that very topic. Got a conspiracy theory of your own? Post it, and try to back it up as best you can!

Postby zoltan2 » Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:59 pm

Woman in the WTC hole inferno (never seen before photos

The woman is where the plain hit. If it would of been so hot to melt steel there is no way she could of been able to stand there.
Controlled demolition explosive with termite did the job. Not the jet fuel.
Imagine it was you.
We cannot forget and we must bring the inside job people to justice.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px-nflAt ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWjHVDjk ... re=related
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby capricorn » Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:05 pm

I mean, I guess you could argue that they are not near the eye of the fire. And, you could argue that it did get so hot that most people wound up jumping any way...
...
...however, that is not to say I think the building fell due to structural damage. I tend to side with the experienced structural engineers who point to the fact that there has never been a skyscraper in history collapse due to fire; and that the collapse of buildings 1,2 and 7 resembled more of a controlled demolition than anything else.
"a free society depends on a virtuous and moral people."
User avatar
capricorn
 
Posts: 714
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:03 pm

Postby greeney2 » Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:33 pm

You have never seen a controlled demolition fall from the top down like the WTC did. Each failed from the floors hit by the aircraft, which were different on each building.
greeney2
 
Posts: 9637
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby zoltan2 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:43 am

capricorn wrote:I mean, I guess you could argue that they are not near the eye of the fire. And, you could argue that it did get so hot that most people wound up jumping any way...
...
...however, that is not to say I think the building fell due to structural damage. I tend to side with the experienced structural engineers who point to the fact that there has never been a skyscraper in history collapse due to fire; and that the collapse of buildings 1,2 and 7 resembled more of a controlled demolition than anything else.


Yup and especially number 7 because no plane crash in it and the fire was minimum.
It was riged way before 911. You don't rigged with explosives a building of 47 floors in 6 hrs to fall completely at free fall.
No burning airplane fire was in number 7
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby greeney2 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:21 am

greeney2
 
Posts: 9637
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby zoltan2 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:19 am

greeney2 wrote:http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm


They decided to pull it period.
And it went down free fall. Just watch it the building was never pulled with cables
Detonations went off at different floors
I showed it in other videos I have posted.
If they had not decided to pull it with dynamite termite what ever the building would be still standing.


http://www.infowars.com/Video/911/wtc7_pbs.WMV
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby zoltan2 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:00 pm

WTC7 - "That is the building that is going to go down next" [

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=O-WZpXiEKAo
Basement Bombs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8InITc8 ... re=related

Theories that Subterranean Bombs Destroyed the Twin Towers
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysi ... tbomb.html

9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!
4409 -- (Unseen Footage) Tower 7 blasted into rubble from NEW angle! [D]


http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&featu ... 72ETepp4GI

9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings! [D]
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby zoltan2 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:01 pm

he Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7

Over 1,000 Professional Architects and Engineers agree that the mysterious collapses of WTC Building 7 and the Twin Towers on 9/11/01 need to be re-examined and investigated. The NIST report is proven to be unscientific and false, using evidence NIST either ignored or gathered and used itself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4dU_p9U ... h_response
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Postby greeney2 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:25 pm

I'm satified with the report I posted. I doubt if you even read it, judging by the time it took to reply, you spent it finding more stuff to copy and paste.
greeney2
 
Posts: 9637
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby zoltan2 » Thu Oct 20, 2011 4:50 am

greeney2 wrote:I'm satified with the report I posted. I doubt if you even read it, judging by the time it took to reply, you spent it finding more stuff to copy and paste.



CDI: 'Pull It' Means 'Pull It Down'

For those who still question what Larry Silverstein meant when he said "pull it" when talking about the collapse of the WTC 7, Jeff from PumpItOut.com called demolition experts Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) and asked them what "pull it" means in demolition terms. This is what CDI told him:
Click here to listen to conversation

Female receptionist: Good afternoon, Loizeaux Company.
Jeff: Um, sorry, do I -- is this Controlled Demolitions?
CDI: Yes it is.
Jeff: Ok, I was wondering if there was someone I could talk to briefly -- just ask a question I had?
CDI: Well what kind of question?
Jeff: Well I just wanted to know what a term meant in demolition terms.
CDI: Ok, what type of term?
Jeff: Well, if you were in the demolition business and you said the, the term "pull it," I was wondering what exactly that would mean?
CDI: "Pull it"?
Jeff: Yeah.
CDI: Hmm? Hold on a minute.
Jeff: Thank you.
CDI: Sir?
Jeff: Yes?
CDI: "Pull it" is when they actually pull it down.
Jeff: Oh, well thank you very much for your time.
CDI: Ok.
Jeff: Bye.
CDI: Bye.


(Remember that Controlled Demolitions, Inc was hired to help with the clean up at ground zero.)


The definition of "pull down":

pull down - To demolish; destroy: pull down an old office building.

pull down 1. To pull down or break up so that reconstruction is impossible: demolish, destroy, dismantle, dynamite, knock down, level, pulverize, raze, tear down, wreck


Again, here's the WTC owner Larry Silverstein's comment about the collapse of the WTC 7:



"I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."


The WTC 7 imploding (notice its penthouse on the top left collapses in half and disappears into the building first):


Reporter: "...that building number 7 was going to collapse.
That appears to be what has happened now."


Hats off to Jeff from PumpItOut.com for taking the initiative to call CDI and reaffirming from the demolition experts themselves what the true meaning of the phrase "pull it" means; demolish!
User avatar
zoltan2
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:33 am

Next

Return to Government and Political Conspiracies

cron
  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest