I believe the mastermind of the Norway massacre is the same one of the Virginia Tech massacre which happened on 4/16/2007. In that case, gunman killed 32 people. Both cases were used to distract a framed case on me.
Like this one, I, too, had predicted something would have happened on 4/17/2007. Four days before 4/17, in "478. April plot and tax return (4/13/07)" I wrote," That's why five days ago, I related the Attorney General Gonzales' hearing of April 17 to the final date of tax return. I have to say again I was very correct. Two days ago, I learned that my wife will have a tour started on April 17. She refuses to tell me where she will go. The tour will last 2 weeks or so. Unusual long compare with her former travels. So framed case will happen in later April. (from Apr. 17)".
The Feds made the Virginia Tech. massacre on 4/16. It played its distract function most in next day because Newspaper started to report it next day.
The two shooting cases were designed by military expert. In Virginia Tech killing, the criminal locked the exit gates of the building with chains in advance, entraped the students who tried to escape. In Norway, they chose an Island. That make the killing number high. It is out of a military tactic to entrape the enemy and eliminate them.
The gunman in both cases were psychological trained. They were cold blood to the victims.
Quote, "Several witnesses gave accounts to news media of how the gunman would mow down bystanders in a hail of bullets, then coolly pull out his pistol to finish off the wounded and dying who lay heaped on the Ground." (Norway, Mercury News July 24/2011.)
In VA Tech killing, Quote, "He seemed very thorough about it, getting almost everyone down. I was trying to act dead," the freshman mechanical engineering student says. "He left for about 30 seconds, came back in, did almost exactly the same thing. I guess he heard us still talking.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... ialComment
Shoot repeatedly on wound and dying people to make the death rate as high as possible. That's their mission. To make the distract to the utmost.
Though Anders Breivik said he hated Muslims, the target he chose was not a mosque but a summer camp held by ruling Labor Party.
He was born in Norway and chose as his targets not Muslims whose presence he detests, but the Labor Party leaders who let them into the country, and their children, the future leaders of that party." (end of quote)
There is political factor in it. I'll talk about it later.
Read my analysis about Virginia Tech. killing at: "480. The real killer behind Virginia Tech. massacre (1) (4/23/07)" to "498. Why VT shooting planned on 4/16 (12) (7/23/07)".
680. Lai Chang-xing and money laundering case (8/10/2011)
Lai Chang-xing was a smuggling head - a China most wanted escapee. His case was always a big news in Chinese newspaper. Nine years ago, I found his deportation date coincided with the action date of the plot applied on me. The deportation was always cancelled at last minute(in air port) when the plot on me went soured. I realized he became a payment chip in secret deal between US and Chinese secret police. I wrote down my allegation first in "94. Interest exchange (10/19/2002)".
The same show staged again and again whenever there was a renewed plot fell on me. The most drammatical one happened in 2007. In airport before he was escorted to the plane to Beijing, in desperation, Lai hit the pillar with his head to resist the deportation. He knew what waited for him was torture and death. It was a shocking to Chinese media. So the reporters puzzled this time - how could Lai left for Beijing this time (7/22/2011) with smile on his face?
My interpretation is that Lai, from being a payment chip, becomes a co-operator of the Feds' plot. He was charged by Canadian government of money laundering. He should know as a China most wanted, he was under surveillance. How could he go on to commit crime?
On 7/10/2011, my mother told me she had given a sum of money (about $50,000) to my wife, and my wife had remitted it to her cousin in Fujian. (her countryland) The money was from by selling an apartment in Shanghai which we had lived for decades. What alarms me was two days later, my daughter told my wife she got a trophy from the Internet - 16 free tickets for a Mexico cruise. For me, this is obviously a murder arrangement. The Feds intend to eliminate all witness of the house trading and turn the money into illegal money laundering.
The handler of the house trading, my uncle, died this Februry. He was the main witness. My brother, the former paper owner of the sold apartment, was arranged in a European travel with a cruise trip in later July. He might die in "travel accident" if the main plot went through. The buyer of the house was a Wenzhonese. I allege he died in the train crash in Wenzhou on 7/23. One day after Lai Chang-xing's deportation.
My uncle's children and my aunt will come to Bay Area this month (August) to bury my uncle's ash in a cemetery. What waiting for them and other witness are that free cruise tickets. Now the 7/22 plot went soured. New plot are in planning, I believe. How many people have died in 7/22 plot? (Norway massacre and Wenzou train crash) How many people would have died if 7/22 plot had gone through? (Big disaster like earthquake, and nuclear bomb attack on New York)
I also worry the Feds may create a gaspipe explosion near that cemetery because it is not far away from San Bruno where a gaspipe explosion killed 7 people eleven months ago. Since then the media kept on talking about the danger of a gaspipe explosion. I view it as a psychological preparation for a gaspipe exploision murder.
681. Norway police is complicity of Anders Breivik (8/15/2011)
Norway police helped Breivik in his terror attack and cover up the plot.
1. Breivik was in police uniform that helped him in his terror attack.
2. Two days before the Norway terror attack, a special police unit conducted a bombing exercise in downtown Oslo which was in same area where Breivik detonated a bomb. The drill was a cover up operation to ensure the success of terror attack case. Breivik was in police uniform. He would have been misunderstood as being a policeman in anti-terror exercise if he was checked or discovered by security guards. The same tactic was used in 7/7/2005 London subway bombing. That criminal style was out of the same handler.
3. The seemingly incompetence of police assured the slaughter going on in Island. It took police one hour to reach Utoya after they received shooting report. In Virginia Tech.killing, Police blocked an information of shooting death of a student (murderer was at large) Which guaranteed the shooting spree could be carried out two hours later. Quote, "Feds Ordered VA Police To Stand Down
Local authorities were told to take no action to pursue killer by Federal agents.
Paul Joseph Watson
Friday, April 20, 2007
4. Hide other shooter.
Witnesses said there were two shooters:
Marius Helander Roset said, “I am sure that there were shots from two different places on the island at the same time”, he said.
The person was following them around was 180 centimeters tall (5’9″), had thick dark hair and non-Nordic appearance. He had a pistol in his right hand and a rifle on his back.
“I believe that there were two people who were shooting”, says Alexander Stavdal (23).
Yet Police said there is only one - Breivik. He was immediately described as “a lone wolf assassin”, who “acted alone” (BBC July 24, 2011)
In Feds planned case, there used to be back-up team to assure the success of the operation. In Virginia case, I alleged the real shooter was a Chinese man. There were at least two others as support group members: Cho Seung Hui and Emily Hilscher. (see my analysis #480 -#498) Of course, Authorities, like their countparter of Norway, said there was only one shooter.
5. Police knew he was Breivik before they arrested him.
“He surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we don’t know is how the police knew the terrorist’s name before they arrested him,” said Snow
http://www.infowars.com/police-knew-gun ... re-arrest/
Police knew him. There was a tacit understanding between them. They called his name, he dropped the weapon immeddiately to avoid a friendly killing.
This was a terror attack co-operated (planned) by police. You can see the trace of the Feds in it.