The Black Vault

Right, its carefully engineered playing dumb with issues, and why one person sues for the cub scout oath, or 4 people with the cross at the WTC.

greeney2 wrote:Very funny! EH if anyone is the expert about playing dumb on this forum its you. Everyone of your proofs, and responses is predicated on playing dumb, and taking out of context a verse from a chapter, or twisting words from everyone. Playing dumb by insisting that inturpetations you distort, is the true meaning of the verse and chapter.

You're the expert of being ignorant of it all, since you refuse to read the Bible yourself --you can't even have a legitimate opinion about it because of that. You're nothing but a bunch of hot air.

greeney2 wrote:Its not playing dumb to show there are dozens of styles of crosses, and you thought if you cut the cross down short, you said you have no problem with it, until you saw the example of greek crosses. It is not playing dumb to show that other organizations also use a cross as a symbol, not just Christian religions. Just happens that, the red cross also is one of the primary responders to this tragedy.

Again, why was it sitting in a Catholic Church all this time? Nobody has yet came forward saying that this thing is representing anything other than Christianity. You're trying to distort the issue by playing dumb, or maybe you really are dumb. If I was a betting man I'd take the latter.

greeney2 wrote:Playing dumb is 4 atheists who in a federal lawsuit, point out their religous prior affilation, and that they are now atheists, offended by, and physically damaged by the displaying of this cross. Horse crap, they are as healthy as you! I'm sure you read the first and second primary physical symptoms of the claim, which is only playing dumb, like whiplash pain in a fender bender is hard to disproove. Fabrication of emotional distress, depression, and having the trotts! Give it a break, its all playing dumb, these people are as healthy as you, just playing a game with the courts

It's called tactical leverage, not "playing dumb."

greeney2 wrote:Like I said before, people are tired of paying the price in life for every ***hole like this in our courts.

You really are a hypocrite when you call people "***hole."

greeney2 wrote:At least nobody can deny the American Red Cross, who have over 40,000 volunteers, aided over 60,000 families, and distributed billions of dollars in aid, could have a valid reason for countersuit for the cross to remain, on the basis it is their symbol and they were primary responders.

We're all still waiting to hear from the Red Cross.

*crickets chirping*

Halfabo wrote:

greeney2 wrote:Very funny! EH if anyone is the expert about playing dumb on this forum its you.

Uh, I don't think he's playing, Greeney.

Yo momma.

greeney2 wrote:Right, its carefully engineered playing dumb with issues, and why one person sues for the cub scout oath, or 4 people with the cross at the WTC.

If we changed the pledge of allegiance to "under no God," I wonder what you'd do.

Would you play smart, or just be dumb?

how about under, "all gods, belief systems and, so forth"?

We're all still waiting to hear from the Red Cross.

That's Rosie Cross to you, mister

As in Rosicrucian?

yep..or Templar Knight, even..they used a red/rosie cross symbol, too

I'm surprised no one jumped me for my question "what would be the harm in that."

I am wondering still what is wrong with politicians and others expressing themselves religiously so long as they aren't religiously biased when it comes to legislation.

I don't see anything wrong with it..just as I dislike how religion has been removed from public schools..instead of removing it..anything should be allowed and tolerated

all for one..one for all

E pluribus unum, indeed...

The Europeans are the living borg, coming to assimilate all corners of the globe with the motto "one out of many." It's on our money!