[ Facebook comments] - NEW! Don't have a FREE Black Vault account? You can still comment using your Facebook, AOL, Hotmail or Yahoo! accounts at the bottom of the page.
The newest revelations in the scientific world -- post articles, discussions and your own ideas.
by rath » Wed May 13, 2009 10:24 pm
deleted
Last edited by
rath on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
rath
-
- Posts: 4345
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
-
by CodeBlack » Thu May 14, 2009 8:46 am
Star Trek had cell phones and we all know that cell phones are not real.

N2TheBlack
-

CodeBlack
-
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
by Aquatank » Thu May 14, 2009 8:55 am
Star Trek communicators are not cell phones. The difference is largely one of range. A cell phone needs to be a relay tower to extend its range. A Star Trek communicator has a range in excess of 75 miles possibly even 1000 miles without a relay station. Basically its the gap difference is similer to between a child's walkie talkie and a military satellite phone.
-
Aquatank
-
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
- Location: Midwest USA
by CodeBlack » Thu May 14, 2009 1:52 pm
Well, the range is simply a matter of transmit/receive power. The old bag phones had 8 watts and had a much longer range. The tiny handhelds today don't have the room for a big enough power source. I think they have like 400 mW. Military has much higher power transmitters and much longer range. The satellite phones can cover the globe as long as you can catch a satellite.
N2TheBlack
-

CodeBlack
-
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Return to Scientific Discoveries and Advancements
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests