226. Fake e-mail (5/4)
My wife's adopted father passed away on 4/30. Feds killed two of her closest relatives in 35 days, all aimed to arrange a trip to connect her to a framed case. The later April frame case seemed soured again but not finished. They may have another one followed in later May or early June. SARS is activated, low interest rate waiting to be lifted up, houses held by Feds must be sold off before then. It's a hurry.
Of course, each time there was a framed case, it always came with internet problem. In later April I was blocked to many web sites for several days. I was blocked to access about 4 sites which belong to about.com, more sites which belong to Delphy group. Include one which I used to post my new message at first. Many other sites were blocked to access by "Web Site Not Responding ", "Error: page not found".
My computer was under Feds control. Any access to internet must be filtered by their server. Each time I started up, there is always a waiting period which I think was the time for the agents to be in their surveillance postion. Each time I went to a new URL which was not in "my favorite" list, there would be a delay too. At that time, there used to be a frozen page to enforce me to re-enter the internet that would take some time. Which I think was the time they used to check that new web site to see if I was allowed to enter. Many times I posted the message and made sure to see my thread was lifted to the top of list, then found the new message disappeared if I came back a few minutes later. Which I believe they had another server to fed me an incomplete information. I have experience that a web site I regularly to post had been suddenly "dead". What I saw was there was no more activity in that forum. But a year or so later, when I saw a reference link and clicked on it, I was led to that forum and found it was never "dead". I can only conclude the URL in "my favorite list" was put by a special link which led me to a "dead page" they prepared for me.
I also was bothered by constant pop-up of the page to suggest me to download "debug program" or "firewall" to prevent virus. I think it was from Feds. If I download these "program", I may download some "criminal record" they want to plant or even an evil program which would sending spamming e-mail from my internet address.
On 4/29, there was such an e-mail for me:
"Subj: AOL WARNING: Your account is a near to be closed
Date: 4/29/2004 6:57:56 PM Central Daylight Time
(AOL Support Dptm.)
It has come to our attention that your AOL Billing information's records are out of date.
This requires an update of your billing information. Please take several minutes out of your
online experience and update your billing records. You will not run into future problems with our online services.
However, failure to update your records will result in your account termination. Please update your records right now.
Once you have updated your account records your AOL session will not be interrupted.
Please click the link below to update your billing records: http://aol-cs2.com
America Online, Inc."
I asked AOL service. They said it was not from them. It was a forgery. So you can expect update will have an evil result.
I announce here once again that I don't do any business in internet. I will never send any e-mail for commercial purpose. I don't communicate with private e-mail unless for some problem enquiry to web site host. I will never threaten other people.
227. A violent way? (5/9)
On 5/5, newspaper reported gas price was near record high. "12 cents overnight spike in bay area angers many, and could jump 7 to 10 cents today." It was $2.21 per gallon on 5/7. I view this round of gas price hike as an effort of Feds to push for the sale of house. After nearly three years of low interest rate, the potential capable house buyers had their houses already. So Feds hope the commuters who live in nearby area to go back to San Jose house market. When the gas price had a sudden jump, I thought Feds was irritated by pressure of rising interest rate. (Of course, they always have some other excuse to cover up the real purpose of rising gas price.)
Really, on 5/8, media reported April was the second strong month for job growth. " US banks are reporting stronger demand for business loans.". "Interest-rate fears send Dow, Nasdaq tumbling.". The "economic recovery" designed for Bush's second term can't wait any longer. So Feds must act before the interest rate rises in this summer.
This reflects the intensified persecution. Killing to arrange trips, visiting at night to pick up tickets, mission at the door which haven't seen for year. I worry there will be a violence planned on me.
On Feb. 23, 2004, there was a string of shootings in highway 580 in East bay area. No one was seriously hurt. I noticed it because media talked a lot about it. Sniper killing is a tactic Feds used to use.
On 3/11, in a well-orchestrated news conference in which police declared Chris Gafford was arrested as the highway sniper.
There was a dramatic turn around next day(3/12). District attorney refused to prosecute Gafford, said there wasn't enough evidence even though authorities from the CHP, the BATF, the Sheriff's Office and local police all said the evidence was strong.
I think Feds plotted a case between 3/1 to 3/12 to frame me in drug case. The tool they used was a car. (see "212. Link to car (3/9)") To guide me into the "car would cause problem", they made my wife send our car to repair. A trap with a borrowing car was too evident so I went to shopping by bike on 3/6. On 3/12 my wife got back our repaired car. Which meant the "car trap" plan was over. The news of D.A.'s refusal to prosecute highway sniper was on same day. I think it is another plan to continue the persecution. This time, they tried a sniper killing. If that happens, they would attribute it to "highway sniper". That's why D.A. refuse to prosecute Gafford. They have another "candidate".
From then on, my wife was reluctant to drive me to shopping. Several times, she refused straightly and said, "go by bike". I had to ask help from my brother.
On 4/24, while my wife was in Hongkong and I couldn't touch my brother, I went for a short time shopping by bike. It was the only bike ride I took since 3/6. The newspaper next day immediately posted an article, "I-580 sniper suspect's case remains in legal limbo". My sudden bike ride was out of Feds' expectation. To have a frame case, it needs resource. Support groups, witness..... They used to arrange everything then guide victim by a bait. That day, Feds might still concentrated in frame case in HongKong. Anyway, they revived it next day. They used to have a relevant news let out before the incident they intend to create. Which will make a frame case more reasonable.
228. The scandal of D.O.D. and the crime of D.O.J. (5/14)
On 5/6, my wife asked me to check why the alarm light of "service engine" was always on in the car. The car had just been sent for repair for a week in March. I viewed it as a signal that Feds played trick on car again.
On 5/7 evening, my wife called my relative discussing plan to go to San Francisco on week-ends to visit my parents. She spoke loudly so I could hear everything she talked. Which meant my parents wouldn't come for an appointment on 5/8. Originally, my parents had planned to pick me up for a dinner outside that day, and of course, to give me a ride for a food shopping.
The two events hinted me that there was danger to ride on my wife's car. And the help from my relatives wouldn't come. I used to shopping food once a week. I depended on the appointment of 5/8 because this time I hadn't do any shopping for two weeks. If there was no help I would have to go by bike. What would be there waiting for me? Gang violence? Police violence? So I didn't go out but wrote the message "227. A violent way".
The case of US abusing Iraqi prisoners was first appeared in media last week. It reached to peak on Friday and Saturday. On 5/7(Friday), five pictures of abuse case occupied the first page of Mercury News. On 5/8, four pages filled with articles of this issue with titles of "Far worth to come", "Rumsfeld warns more images of abuse will appear". I was shocked. Not for the news of abuse: I knew this government is hypocrite, full of plots, cheating, abuse, crimes. But for the result of news. It will hurt Bush administration and its war policy. That's against the will of inside group. Media is thier tool. How could it do such a movement against its master? I puzzled.
The scandal cool off in following days. A "beheading" case was thrown out to offset the negative result of abusing prisoners. The "far worse photo" won't appear for some reasons. One excuse was for the "privacy" of prisoners. (a most shameless and hypocrite justification) While I was arranging newspaper record, I found this peak time. I suddenly bewared of this was a case set up for diversion. The peak time coincided with possible day I would bike out for food. I had warned Feds use "terrorist attack" to divert. (In December attempt, they raised alarm code to orange, in April case they talked of "Al Qaida attack to HongKong") I didn't expect they manipulate it in this way.
If I was eliminated on 5/8, I think a series of cases would have happened to other people who knew this case. And the scandal would be prolonged by more "far worse photo" and "struggle to pull down Rumsfeld" to diverge public's attention from a framed case. Because a scandal of "D.O.D." is far less important than to cover up the crime of D.O.J..
I had another article about "abusing prisoners" in another thread.
Government deception (5/13)
Bush said what happened in Abu Ghurayb prison was done only by a few people and high ranking military officials denied they knew anything about it. It was a lie. They knew it clearly there were vast abuse in the jail.
Quote, "Red Cross report details abuse, mistaken detentions in Iraq.
By Bob Drogin
Los Angeles Times.
Washington - Coalition military intelligence officials estimated that 70 to 90 percent of prisoners detained in Iraq since the war began last year "had been arrested by mistake," according to a confidential Red Cross report given to the Bush administration earlier this year.
The report described a wide range of prisoner mistreatment - including many new details of abusive techniques - that it said US officials had failed to halt, despite repeated complaints from the International Committee of the Red Cross. "(S.J.M.N. 5/11/04)
As a matter of fact, torture is a method intelligence used to squeeze information from detainees. US government covered it up with fake news, disinformation and lies. The death of Saddam Hussain's sons was a typical example.
News reported Saddam's sons Uday and Qusay, along with other two people, were all died in a six hours' long battle against 200 US soldiers. But forensic analysis revealed that Uday and Qusay were tortured before their death. There is an article with pictures and details on it.
Quote, "America's Uday and Qusay Conjuring Trick
Latest White House lies reveal larger hidden untruths
Unfortunately the forgery team completely forgot to use any putty around the ankles..... If you look at the color picture of the two cadavers lying side by side, the one on the right has unique brown marks on both ankles. These marks have been identified by experts as pressure sores, caused by iron clamps used to hold the ankles while this poor man was suspended upside down for torture in the "Adnan Chalabi Hilton". As I wrote earlier, death must have finally come as merciful relief for these two......."http://www.joevialls.co.uk/transpositions/hussein.html
As I told before, media is controlled by inside group. It serves for the war policy of this group. Why this time it suddenly threw out a scandal which hurt the fame of Bush's administration? None of such kind of event happens by coincidence. They always have a purpose. (to be continued)
229. Unreasonable search and arrest (5/19)
In recent messages I revealed how Feds activated their high ranking resources to work in the frame case. How Bush, Cheney, Mueller took part in secret deal with China. The latest message of 5/14 talked about how they planned to use Iraqi prisoners abusing case as a diversion. Then there is a dramatic turn around.
On 5/15, Mercury News reported, "Ashcroft unveils big effort to share anti-terror data.". "The Justice Department will lead a national effort to coordinate intelligence information among all law enforcement agencies, A. G. John Ashcroft announced Friday, in an effort to knock down a "wall" between agencies that many top officials have said hindered the efforts to stop terrorist attacks in this country.
"Government erected a wall that segregated criminal investigators from intelligence agents, government buttressed that wall, and before Sept. 11, 2001, government was blinded by that wall." (by Maria Newman. New York Times)
The so said "wall" Ashcroft referred is a law which forbid to use foreign intelligence information in local criminal investigation. The search warrant for a foreign spy or terrorist is issued by FISA court. (Foreign Intelligence Spy Act) Which is in a low standard, agent can get it only on suspicion. While for a criminal investigation, the search warrant must base on evidence. Because US citizens are protected by 4th Amendment from unreasonable search and arrest. The point of "sharing intelligence information in criminal investigation" is to low the standard of criminal investigation . Citizens can be thus searched and arrested depend on suspicion of agents not evidence. If Ashcroft's propose goes through, 4th amendment then means nothing. FBI is historically notorious for its abusing power.
The wall doesn't hurt any effort to stop terrorist. Feds can apply anytime with FISA court. The real goal Ashcroft wants is to expand police power, to keep American people under his surveillance at his will.
The article also revealed the Feds now is turning onto the help of local police. Which accords with their attempt to force me out by bike. I have alleged I feared a police violence if I biked out.
The news paper next day proves my doubt. There were two articles about police in "World Journal" of 5/16.
One is the story of a food delivery man. He was friendly with police but was sent to court once he broke a rule. His conclusion at last was: Obey policemen, follow law.
Another one is "The experience of a juror". Which talked about the whole procedure of being a juror and a case in court. A man was searched by police officers when he walked on road. They found the defendant had less than a gram of heroin in his pocket. The man was charged two accounts: Holding drug and assault police man. The charge of holding drug dropped in plea bargain. The defendant admitted resist arrest.
What I noticed is the lawyer argued the defendant was searched illegally. He walked on the road, that was true. But there was no side walk for passengers there, so in the law, he didn't break any rule. As policemen, they should know it. It's obvious that police officers arrest the defendant on suspicion not evidence. Breaking the rule of walking on road was only an excuse. It was an unreasonable search and arrest. This shows how 4th amendment is important for the civil right of people. The defendant had been in jail for more than a year already before judge gave the sentence.
My immediate thought was that it proved my allegation they would use local policeman for a violent murder or arrest. When they failed to force me go out by bike alone, they probably would use old tactic, a "juror summon" to force me out. (see "69. Juror summon ")
Not a coincidence, next day on 5/17, a "juror" summon was in my post box. It was for my wife. I think it was a psychological preparation for me to believe all is naturally happened. I expect soon there will be a "juror summon" for me. A procedure prepared for a police search and arrest. When I picked up the summon letter, my feeling was that I almost could predict what they would do in advance. What surprised me was they did it so tightly. They are really in a hurry.
230. Unreasonable search and arrest (2) (5/24)
Several times I found the rice stored at home was poisoned, I concluded at last that it was done when I was out to shopping food when there was no people at home. (That is another advantage to empty the community that there will be no witness if Feds intrudes the house.) That's why I have to shopping at week-ends while my wife could give me a drive and my daughter was at home. My relatives all knew I shopping in this way.
Feds knew this too. So they arranged a trap on Saturday 5/8.(see "228. The scandal of D.O.D. and the crime of D.O.J.") I felt this and on 5/9 posted "227. A violent way?". In which I alleged Feds would use police violence when I biked out. Next day on 5/10, my wife told me the alarm light of "service engine" was off. Later that week, she drove me for a food shopping. It was three weeks I stayed at home without going out. Followed with was "summon" trap as I told in last massage. Then:
On Saturday, 5/22, Mercury News published new photos which said was obtained by Washington Post a day ago. Media is a tool of inside group. Many event was started by newspaper leaking on purpose. Such like Water Gate scandal. When they revived the prisoners' abusing scandal by new photo which has been silenced for some time, I thought Feds was continuing the same tactic they used two weeks ago. You can expect that my wife refused to drive me for food that day.
At noon, I saw a stranger's car coming to park at my garage door. The passengers were my parents, the driver was a friend of my sister. They came from San Francisco. The reason they came here was the car failed in smog check. The mechanic thought it was caused by dirty gas tank so he told the owner to burn out all gas. It needed three hours' drive. So he offered a free drive for my parents to San Jose. And of course, he would drive me for a food shopping when my parents were stay at home. I refused. I straightly told them I worried Feds might have planted something in the car. It would be all their words if they said police found I was doing drug deal in a stranger's car. Same tactic they used two months ago. (see "212. Link to car")
The trap is coming one after another. Obviously the action team is under big pressure from high ranking. Election day is coming. Employment must increase. The interest is hard to stay at recent low level. Real estates must be sold. So they must finish my case.
When the team tried everything, they picked up old tactic they used two years ago. Forcing me out alone, or in a stranger's car, to encounter a police search, then a police violence or arrest. If the arrest happens, force you plea guilty. They don't care how long the sentence will be. Because once you were in jail, there are various way to kill. To persuade you to admit guilty, they do every psychology work on you. One thing is by newspaper. So one day before Saturday, on 5/21, an article posted in Mercury News. Which is similar to one which took place two years ago. (see "66. Turn innocent into criminal (5/20/2002)").
Quote, "50-year sentence is like a last beating
Woman gambles in court, and loses.
"Shanahan, backed up by friends, police reports and photographs of her own blackened eyes, testified that her husband beat her repeatedly for years." She killed her husband when he threatened to kill her. "The prosecutors offered a plea bargain that would have freed her in as little as four years. Shanahan turned it down, gambling that she could avoid a conviction. She could not. She was sentenced to 50 years in prison.". "It's a mandatory law sentencing. Many observers are horrified."
"Consider the Connecticut college student who was peripherally involved in her boy-friend's drug ring - never sold drugs, never used them, had never been in trouble before.
If Feds planned to arrest you in a road search, and fed you such an article to read one day before that plan. What is their purpose? Read message 66 again.