greeney2 wrote:Get your facts straight Rath, the first rape was dismissed while the 2nd was still under investigation, when he fled the country. Thats why he was arrested under a International arrest warrent and fighting extradition now.
the first rape was dismissed while the 2nd was still under investigation,
Final arguments in the extradition hearing of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange were presented in a London court on Friday.
The judge is expected to rule on February 24, but the case is likely to continue long afterward if either side files an appeal.
Assange is being sought for questioning in Sweden on rape and coercion allegations stemming from sexual relations he had with two women in that country last August. One woman has claimed that Assange pinned her down to have sex with her and intentionally tore a condom he wore. The second woman claims that he had sex with her while she was initially asleep, failing to wear a condom despite repeated requests for him to do so. Assange has disputed their claims.
Assange’s attorneys have argued that Swedish prosecutor Marianne Ny had abused the Swedish and U.K. legal process by attempting to extradite Assange without charging him with a crime, and for alleged offenses that are not subject to extradition. They contradicted Ny’s assertion that Sweden had issued an arrest warrant for Assange only after exhausting all “normal procedures” for questioning him.
The WikiLeaks founder, they said, had made himself available to Swedish prosecutors for questioning when he was in that country last year, but the prosecutor’s office had failed to follow up. The office had also given Assange permission to leave the country, only to then issue an arrest warrant to force him to return to Sweden for questioning, without ever first making a formal request to him to come in for an interview in the U.K.
“The proper, proportionate and legal means of requesting a person’s questioning in the U.K. in these circumstances is through Mutual Legal Assistance,” attorney Mark Stephens wrote in court documents, adding that “there is nothing to show that the Prosecutor ever sought to engage the usual MLA procedures for questioning Mr. Assange.”
Defense attorneys have also claimed that Assange would not get a fair trial in Sweden, since rape trials in that country are sometimes held behind closed doors.
Clare Montgomery, the London-based attorney representing Swedish prosecutors in the hearing, has argued that they acted within the law in issuing an arrest warrant for Assange. She also disputed that Assange would be tried in secret in Sweden. Although evidence in the trial might be heard in private, arguments in the case would be made in public.
Photo: Julian Assange (center) speaks to the media, flanked by his lawyers Mark Stephens (left) and Jennifer Robinson after making a appearance at Belmarsh Magistrates’ Court in London, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011.
•Feds Subpoena Twitter Seeking Information on Ex-WikiLeaks Volunteer
•Details of Sex Crime Allegations Against WikiLeaks’ Assange Surface
•Report: Federal Grand Jury Considering Charges Against WikiLeaks’ Assange
•Interpol Issues ‘Red Notice’ for Arrest of WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange
•WikiLeaks’ Assange To Meet With U.K. Police Over Swedish Warrant
Tags: Julian Assange, WikiLeaks
Post Comment | Permalink
Also on Wired.com
Google Maps Mashup Documents Libyan Protests
AllVid Battle Lines: Google, Best Buy, Sony Ally Against Big Cable
Superheroes, Robots and a Psychotic Tire: 2011's Most Intriguing Movies
Burning Student Question: Is There Life After Microsoft Office?
Did a Spy Flap Stop the Drones From Blasting Pakistan?
Facebook Adds 'Civil Partnerships,' But For Some It's Not Enough
Related Topics: Crime, Crime and Law, Espionage and Intelligence, Europe, Extradition, Government
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest