The Black Vault

greeney2 wrote:It was broad daylight and many people saw the airplane! Move on to the next theory and set of "Guess What" pictures.

Give us some names there Greeney---You're position on this is an obvious one, but if it were me, I'd not worry about upsetting my apple cart

Surely you are not this slow--so why not explain--maybe you've no idea how big a 757 really is, maybe you think that they really do melt into fortified objects, or do tricks at a few hundred MPH just a few feet off the ground.

I feel sorry for you in that regard.

What kind of plane did they see Greeney?????????

You may think you're having a laugh, acting like a man--it's embarrassing--

Maybe you can have John request the cctv footage of the bird in question--it would be a great way to make me look stupid--go ahead have a go---she what happens!

Can you list some of these people who have actually been charged with the act!

I'm all ears.

Cole

greeney2 wrote:http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/witnesses/bart.html

Shill site housed on Government servers, one set up to counter questions in regard to 9-11. Sprinkles bits of truth with large doses of disinfo. Long haired dude from MIT is their main mouthpiece.
Fintan Dunne calls them out in his CIA Fake list. Not that that means anything to anyone ignorant of the facts.

Most of his stuff have many things in common--anyway most people now know that these kinds of sites were designed to capture and steer, control, those looking for info on what really happened that day.

Here you go Greeney: The pentagon's leading GATEKEEPER SITE--Complete with John Lear himself debating someone with valid questions in regard to the Pentagon/CIA/9-11 in general.

You see Leah claims he never really was employed by the CIA---He just flew planes for them!

In other words he's your kind of guy--so have a read--it's full of the usual divide and conquer techniques used by some on this very board---BUT YOU KNOW THIS ALREADY.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/inde ... opic=17842

Scroll down and see how he isolates via the quote bar--and dissects with his pity bullshit responses.

I'd cut him to pieces one on one! Period! The tee-shirt wearing kid " WHO SHOUTS INSIDE JOB " Like a fool ---folds up neatly into a gift wrapped box---that ain't no accident!

best,

Cole

You asked for names, and I provided them, what a suprize you don't believe it.

greeney2 wrote:You asked for names, and I provided them, what a suprize you don't believe it.

Bologna Greeney--pure steaming bologna---YOU posted a link--YOU named NO ONE--Not one sorry ass soul.

Any of those people Military or Media? How about actors on the spot, maybe just out for a drive, or in the right spot at the right time.

Cole

greeney2 wrote:http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/witnesses/bart.html

Designed by one the Governments leading shills--Jim Hoffman--!!

Enough said.

Websites designed by Hoffman

* Justice for Woody - Website documenting and analyzing the police shooting of Robert Woodward in Brattleboro, VT in 2001
* California Photon - Information and resources about renewable energy economy in California and beyond
* 911review.com - "9-11 Review: A Resource for Understanding the 9/11/01 Attack"
* 911research.wtc7.net - "9-11 Research: An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001"
* wtc7.net - "wtc7.net - The unexplained collapse of Building 7"

[edit] Audio

* Visibility 9-11 Welcomes 9-11 Researcher Jim Hoffman (August 2009)
* Visibility 9-11 interviews Jim Hoffman in two parts. Part one, and part two. (September 2006)
* SueSupriano.com - 'Don Paul - Jim Hoffman', interviewed by Sue Supriano (November 3, 2003)
* Guns and Butter - interview September 28, 2005

[edit] Video

* [1] - Jim Hoffman WTC 9/11 Demolition Analysis video

Try harder Greeney---I'm pulling for ya--

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hoffman

You've sourced material from a truther, one of their leaders! Ironic isn't it!

What's next---you gonna buy a " 9-11 was an INSIDE JOB " Tee-shirt and rent a bullhorn !~

Bush league!

Cole

Lets just say in 76 pages of your post here, you havn't convinced anyone of anything, you just keep arguing with everyone, and denying whatever anyone presents to you. I'm sure you have several people who clearly saw "the missile", tons of blurry pictures that proove it, but the long list who saw the airplane are all liars.

Leave it alone. It is a mole. A goverment information collector to spread disinformation. It makes no result to argue with a professional propagandar. So you saw its behavior.

----------------

Most people don't believe official story of 911
Quote, “
Poll in Germany: 89.5 doubt official version of 9/11
Submitted by coop on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:03am
• 9/11 Opinion Poll

A recent poll in the german magazine "Welt der Wunder" conducted by the well known Emnid Institute results in astonishing 89% of the german respondents not believing the official line 9/11. The magazine in 2010 already published the story of NATOs "secret nuclear war", where the consequences of the widespread use of depleted uranium ammunitions were explained.

http://war-is-illegal.livejournal.com/117639.html

If me, or anyone else in this thread, is a disinformation agent then we should be getting paid. I wouldn't do it for free. So Cole can you present a pay stub for any of us misinformants?

CodeBlackv2 wrote:If me, or anyone else in this thread, is a disinformation agent then we should be getting paid. I wouldn't do it for free. So Cole can you present a pay stub for any of us misinformants?

Citing disinfo doesn't necessarily make someone an agent, maybe it just makes them ignorant of the event. When someone say's " THAT'S A RABBIT HOLE " or " THAT'S DISINFO " it doesn't mean that someone is being accused of anything---but being as it is, you guys seem to be beyond paranoid--so call it as you will.

Not convinced anyone: Great observation Greeney---all of three people/posters that you know here in your world---there are millions outside this place---maybe you should get out more!

best,

Cole

PS:

Leave it alone. It is a mole. A goverment information collector to spread disinformation. It makes no result to argue with a professional propagandar. So you saw its behavior.

Yes indeed--maybe you should ask Codeblack and Greeney--why Government agencies saw fit to embed code in certain 9-11 photos found on various websites that deal with finding the truth!

I'd love to hear Greeney put that in perspective that everyone can understand!