Confidential UN maps show
Aquarian wrote:It means the truth should be revealed. Secrecy breeds tyranny.
If soldiers are going to continue dying for the imperialist cause, the voting population should have the full story.
Notice that it is the two vociferous supporters of the occupation and war of aggression in Afghanistan who view this as a reprehensible act.
Comparing this to revealing World War II plans is argumentative at best.
people should have a right to be informed about what is going on in their world because it affects us all equally.
There is alot of information to suggest that the U.S. and England contributed to the rise of Hitler for geostrategic gains and interests, along with the support of the Rockefellers and other oil tycoons.
Our foreign spying, meddling, wars of aggression, occupations, genocide against civilians, war profiteering, fattening of the military budget, etc is what is at the very heart of this issue.
Oh hardly, you're equally loud about your opinions, just that you're on the other side of the fence so to speak.
Again, hardly. I realize it's on a different level but the two scenarios are similar in nature if not in scope.
First of all, how does it affect us all equally?
Second, why should people have a right to information when said information being public knowledge can lead to bloodshed?
Throw some literature my way. Maybe we can talk about it once I read up on it.
That's your interpretation of your countries foreign affairs, but not everyone agrees with your interpretation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests