Supposedly New Critter In Lousiana

[ Facebook comments] - NEW! Don't have a FREE Black Vault account? You can still comment using your Facebook, AOL, Hotmail or Yahoo! accounts at the bottom of the page.

Sightings of bigfoot, lake monsters around the world, and the chupacabras are just some of the many cryptozoological stories on the rise! Although many of these stories are controversial - some have evidence that defies belief.


Supposedly New Critter In Lousiana

Postby Wing-Zero » Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:43 am

War is an extension of economics and diplomacy through other means.

Economics and diplomacy are methods of securing resources used by humans.

Securing resources is the one necessary behavior for all living things.

War = Life
User avatar
Wing-Zero
 
Posts: 3139
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: California Uber Alles

Re: Supposedly New Critter In Lousiana

Postby BloodStone » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:12 am

Hard to explain that one... :geek:








BloodStone...
If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.
User avatar
BloodStone
 
Posts: 1408
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: U.S.S.A

Re: Supposedly New Critter In Lousiana

Postby Wing-Zero » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:36 pm

We'll see. Lots of folk claim photoshop. Dimensions of the torso and shoulders is apparently off, shadows are irregular, etc.
War is an extension of economics and diplomacy through other means.

Economics and diplomacy are methods of securing resources used by humans.

Securing resources is the one necessary behavior for all living things.

War = Life
User avatar
Wing-Zero
 
Posts: 3139
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: California Uber Alles

Re: Supposedly New Critter In Lousiana

Postby BloodStone » Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:37 am

photoshop is everyones excuse for everything now a days..

I don't know what to say about it other than , Shadows being off / it's a night vision, how can there be proper shadows ? People just like to say it's faked with photoshop, thats the biggest hinderance on anything we may find these days.

too much technology for people to make things look the way they want, kinda makes me lose hope for finding anything new . The only real proof to anyone anymore will mean killing , and dragging a body to a scientist. If it's a photot, it won't be enough , nope it's photoshopped.

Like the original Bigfoot film, there was no photoshop back then , and still people don't beleive it was real. The thing had boobs for crying out loud, who would go thru all the trouble to make a gorilla suit with boobs ? it was a female bigfoot, but people just can't open their minds , they think we have seen , and know all there is to know on this planet, we haven't even scratched the surface.



BloodStone...
If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.
User avatar
BloodStone
 
Posts: 1408
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: U.S.S.A

Re: Supposedly New Critter In Lousiana

Postby sandra » Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:24 am

Well with the birds falling from the skies
something odd is happening in those areas.
“Living backwards!” Alice repeated in great
astonishment. “I never heard of such a thing!”
“—but there’s one great advantage in it, that one’s
memory works both ways.”
— Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass
User avatar
sandra
 
Posts: 3695
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:27 pm
Location: Minnesota US

Re: Supposedly New Critter In Lousiana

Postby Halfabo » Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:23 pm

BloodStone wrote:photoshop is everyones excuse for everything now a days..

I don't know what to say about it other than , Shadows being off / it's a night vision, how can there be proper shadows ? People just like to say it's faked with photoshop, thats the biggest hinderance on anything we may find these days.

too much technology for people to make things look the way they want, kinda makes me lose hope for finding anything new . The only real proof to anyone anymore will mean killing , and dragging a body to a scientist. If it's a photot, it won't be enough , nope it's photoshopped.

Like the original Bigfoot film, there was no photoshop back then , and still people don't beleive it was real. The thing had boobs for crying out loud, who would go thru all the trouble to make a gorilla suit with boobs ? it was a female bigfoot, but people just can't open their minds , they think we have seen , and know all there is to know on this planet, we haven't even scratched the surface.



BloodStone...



Even if it was killed and autopsied and the autopsy photos published, there would still be people that would say it was photoshopped.
Halfabo
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Re: Supposedly New Critter In Lousiana

Postby sandra » Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:38 pm

Yeah I get really sick of hearing about photoshop period.
Little off topic, but my Uncle was great friends with the professor
from the University of Michigan and he offered to sell it to him
back in the 80's, for 1million dollars. Its fairly
ridiculous he never bought it considering it was even
at that time not much money to him. Even the owner
of IBMs daughter worked for my uncle ....he just should
have invested in it, still kicks himself in the butt over
that one.

You're right halfabo, there is always someone there
that will say, ah nah it was photoshopped. :roll:
“Living backwards!” Alice repeated in great
astonishment. “I never heard of such a thing!”
“—but there’s one great advantage in it, that one’s
memory works both ways.”
— Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass
User avatar
sandra
 
Posts: 3695
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:27 pm
Location: Minnesota US


Return to Cryptozoology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron

[ ]