You, on the deepest level, know of your fulfilled entity self and seek to exceed this current programming to be your total "self".
at1with0 wrote:First off, thanks for the comment.
You're talking about my true self, as it were, right? That Being already fulfilled but the programming of this host would be exceeded in some sense in order to find "fulfillment," whatever that is?
By continuum I am interpreting that as there being many gradations instead of merely two states "fulfilled" and "not fulfilled". Is that what you meant?You, on the deepest level, know of your fulfilled entity self and seek to exceed this current programming to be your total "self".
Yes, exactly. How does one go about that precisely?? Or maybe I already know...
malai5 wrote:at1with0, yes, your True Self/Soul Self does not directly operate in this particular 3D paradigm so your activities here are program limited.
Yes, many states/levels of evolution contained in the whole entity which contribute to the whole at the same time.
Yes, on some level you already know, but are limited to your role on this level, as that is the priority for this level. Horses for courses, as it were.
Understand Universally, act locally.
malai5 wrote:at1with0, when did you rewrite your program???
How can one possibly hope to understand something of which there is no way you can conceptionalise it.
No one is telling you what your "role" is, that is your assumption. Your role is just a positional construct from which you do what you do.
bionic wrote:where ever you are is where you're at
first of all, I feel compelled to say something to you that was said to me once, long ago, by my now dead, mom-in-law..on a day I was postering..probably about the meaning fo life..or something like it...per usual
she said something like..
"have you considered you think too much? that maybe you read too many books? That you need to settle down and just live your life a bit?"
malai5 wrote:at1with0, whatever changes were made in the direction I used to travel to the one I now travel would not, of necessity mean a change in programming, but rather my programming just enacted to bring about a life change in 3D terms.
What you "are shooting for" if it cannot be conceptualised, is folly, or at best, wishful thinking.
Yes, you do what you do because you are you, but "doing" is more effective if you just allow "it" to happen, rather than trying to make it happen.
By trying to "think" it into existance is counter productive because you are then creating a fixity of thought which limits your ability to receive the non conceptualised information that would be available to you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests