The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

The War on Terrorism & Homeland Security

Iraq Air Raids Hit Mostly Women and Children

Discuss the War on Terrorism, Homeland Security, Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea and other global terrorist concerns.

Postby Aquarian » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:22 am

Iraq Air Raids Hit Mostly Women and Children
Report urges review of military strategy when targeting urban areas
by Kim Sengupta

Air strikes and artillery barrages have taken a heavy toll among the most vulnerable of the Iraqi people, with children and women forming a disproportionate number of the dead.

Analysis carried out for the research group Iraq Body Count (IBC) found that 39 per cent of those killed in air raids by the US-led coalition were children and 46 per cent were women. Fatalities caused by mortars, used by American and Iraqi government forces as well as insurgents, were 42 per cent children and 44 per cent women.

Twelve per cent of those killed by suicide bombings, mainly the tool of militant Sunni groups, were children and 16 per cent were females. One in five (21 per cent) of those killed by car bombs, used by both Shia and Sunni fighters, was a child; one in four (28 per cent) was a woman.

The figures, compiled by academics at King's College and Royal Holloway, University of London, show that hi-tech weaponry has caused lethal damage to those in the population who would be furthest away from the conflict.

The victims of one of the most brutal and common types of killings in the war - abduction and execution by death squad - were 95 per cent men, many of them bearing marks of torture.

The report, The Weapons That Kill Civilians, Deaths of Children and Noncombatants in Iraq, was compiled from a sample of 60,481 deaths in 14,196 events over a five-year period since the 2003 invasion. Civilian casualties from concentrated bouts of violence, such as the two sieges of Fallujah, were excluded.

IBC estimates that the total deaths in the conflict so far number 99,774. The medical journal The Lancet has maintained in another study that more than 600,000 people were killed in the first three years of the war. IBC holds that the indiscriminate nature of the fatalities caused by air strikes shows they should not be used in urban areas.

Growing anger over civilian casualties caused by air raids in another front of the "war on terror", Afghanistan, has led to the US, UK and their Nato partners reviewing their policy of using warplanes. Hamid Karzai, the Afghan President, recently said this had become the most contentious issue between him and Western powers.

From 2004 to 2007, the overall tonnage of munition dropped from planes in the Afghan conflict rose from 163 tonnes a year to 1,956 tonnes, an increase of 1,100 per cent. Since 2001 the US air force has dropped 14,049 tonnes of bombs in Afghanistan and 18,858 in Iraq.

Professor John Sloboda, of Royal Holloway, co-author of the report, said: "Our weapon-specific findings have implications for a wide range of conflicts, because the patterns found in this study are likely to be replicated for these weapons whenever they are used.

*Last night a US army sergeant was facing life imprisonment after being found guilty of executing four Iraqi detainees in 2007. Master Sgt John Hartley shot four men in the head and dumped their bodies in a canal in West Rasheed area of Baghdad. He is due to be sentenced today.

Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/04/16-5
The Few assume to be the deputies, but they are often only the despoilers of the Many.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
User avatar
Aquarian
 
Posts: 780
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Miami, Florida

Postby jwebb » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:44 am

I don't think that this is news anymore bro.
Chemedoonam?
User avatar
jwebb
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:19 am
Location: Atlanta

Postby BloodStone » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:05 pm

Never was, It's called colateral damage it happens during war ya know.











BloodStone...
If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.
User avatar
BloodStone
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: U.S.S.A

Postby screamzero » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:30 pm

Aqualung's gonna be sniveling over it for decades...seems one can't have a war without a bit of bitchin'...even when the perp pissed in his own cornflakes....I still don't even think he's ever noticed it. You'd think the whining wonder could smell it. Hell, it's right up in everybody's face. Duh-uh-uh-uh...
User avatar
screamzero
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Texas, U.S.A.

Postby hxxx » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:48 pm

BloodStone wrote:Never was, It's called colateral damage it happens during war ya know.



I think that came off more callous than you may have intended?
hxxx
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby Jaack » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:15 pm

If true it saves us from killing the kids later.
What?
User avatar
Jaack
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Google Earth

Postby Aquarian » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:16 pm

Go to the military to solve a problem, you will get war and weaponry, and if you have hawks in the Congress and in the Presidency or you have stupid people, inexperienced people and/or people who love to make money more than anything else and love the concept of POWER, etc., they will take the advice of the military and frequently then we will be primed for a continuance of war or new reasons to create more war will be developed.

Women and children don't count anymore, neither do the "pawn soldiers" [Kissinger's description] and fighters, mostly male, if they ever did count. It's all so impersonal, dishonest, and depraved. It's historically far more important to develop and try out all these new weapons than worry about individuals or their gender or age or anything like that.

How unfortunate most of you have fatalist attitudes towards something that should never be in existence; including this immoral war.
The Few assume to be the deputies, but they are often only the despoilers of the Many.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
User avatar
Aquarian
 
Posts: 780
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Miami, Florida

Postby screamzero » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:02 pm

How fortunate we have reasons to rid the planet of immoralities...could save the children....
User avatar
screamzero
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Texas, U.S.A.

Postby Tairaa » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:51 pm

Jaack wrote:If true it saves us from killing the kids later.


Yer an ***hole Jaack.
"George Bush says he speaks to god every day, and christians love him for it. If George Bush said he spoke to god through his hair dryer, they would think he was mad. I fail to see how the addition of a hair dryer makes it any more absurd."
Tairaa
 
Posts: 2940
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby screamzero » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:57 pm

Ya, but he's a good ***hole. I think you missed the point big T. :lol:
User avatar
screamzero
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am
Location: Texas, U.S.A.

Next

Return to The War on Terrorism & Homeland Security

  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there are 2 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 1 guest