event_horizon wrote:screamzero wrote:Of religion you know nothing but your vitriol. You've never coordinated cognizances of philosophical conclusions from the secular knowledge base in contrast of religious dogma to even know which is good or worthless. That 's just so obvious with you. Know more about what your bashing...your ignorance proceeds you. A blanket statement about anything is the least wise manner of thinking any can do.
....O.K.? You may now continue pissing....and moaning....
I don't know how on Earth your warped perceptions arrive at these conclusions and I don't care. You think you're smart with these silly run-on sentences, using fancy words, and all you sound like is some babbling nutjob. Your opinions mean about as much to me as a maggot taking a dump on a cow patty.
...d-duh-uh. Typo...u gilly soose. Did intuitive cognizance fall out of your anal werks!?
...incapable of figuring out a hurried statement?...an impassioned plea to have you
deflate your great egotistical, self-righteous intellect enough to be objective?.. your
mouthage seems to intimate your bright...fool me twice ...your pie hole speaks
volumes of your arrogant self-assurance...if you couldn't figure what I clumsily attempted
to relay with an impassioned plea (your bone headed pride and ego blinds you so grossly) in exposing your insolence...
then you are a idjiot...lets try it again...match face:
[color=#FF0000]"Have you ever coordinated cognizances of philosophical conclusions
from the secular knowledge base to contrast against religious dogma to even know which
is good or worthless?"............capiSH!?.....DEAD E-EYE? Did I sound religious enough then!?!?!?. Anal N3ck? (<this does bear high-lighting and repeating.)
You can't form a coherent thought (admittingly so), then throw a tantrum
[...... admittedly so...grammar queen^]
containing 3rd grade insults when someone doesn't understand what's going on in that stuck together ball of cooked noodles you call a brain? You need to be on some type of medication...probably anti-psychotics.
And that "revised statement" is still stupid. "Coordinated cognizances" doesn't make sense. Either you're cognizant of something or you aren't. There's no coordination required. And the rest of it is nothing but vague BS.
You also need to learn the difference between your and you're. I mean, wow, man, you're so dumb you're even dumber than 'Dumb and Dumberer'. You need to go back to grammar school.
screamzero wrote:P.S. (Sorry I did not reply sooner...I actually have a life. )
After all this time you remembered me? Awww, how sweet. I'm flattered.
So this has been nagging away at you for almost 4 months (you've made other posts since)...eating you up inside...and this was the best you could do? You should have just let it go dude...'cause this really makes you look pathetic.
So you actually have a "life"? And what kinda life is that? Daily sessions of rolling around in your own poop? Metaphorically speaking of course (but who knows). [/quote]
2 a : knowledge, awareness <had no cognizance of the situation> (one of a
variant of definitions in accordance to use)...adding an s may indicate plurality
however unusual or awkward this may seem to you. Maybe comparing two venues
of information sources like religious pedagogy and secular conclusions about ethical
and moral behavior standards doesn't come across as two different subject sources
to you, but most that walk on their hind legs figure this to be at least two
Having never alluded to perfection in grammar as you have, I concede to being
imperfect in grammner at times, although if you'd ever learn to paste the right
square piece of paper onto the correct square picture you could have figured what more
than one really is. Maybe you'd be sounding less like some school kid and more apt to
be objective in your queries and observations were you to grow up and pay attention
to what this thread really is about.
A boat load of denizens that live in this same existence as you and I do seem to ignore
the truth that a matrix of the two (philosophical/ religious pedagogy and scientific/ secular pedagogy)
actually have a quantum strength when objectively "harmonized" (hence the varied and sundry persecutions "yawn"),
but I don't ...
expect you to have the esoteric mentality to come to such a conclusion that physics and philosophy have a
common point (a theory supported from the quantum physics angle a
couple of years back)....and with a handle like "event horizon" one would think you did...
but no....you remain stupid.
Two variant cognizances that, because of their novel juxtaposition, might require an
adjusted set of words to grapple with for the sake of understanding. It is no wonder
you chide and mock like some low browed offspring of clowns. You make it very plain
for all to see that you have only one source of credo ut intelligam with which to
confer and express a moral and ethical benchmark. This explains your brass browed
attitudes and mule necked beliefs. What's really impressive is your powerful, analytical
prowess so wonderfully displayed by your clever use of the word "poop".