Oh you folks.
Proof most certainly does.
No, it does not!
The mind observes a natural phenomenon, the mind says "why", tests are ran, studies are done, a conclusion is arrived at with "proof" of the "why", and the mind is satisfied.
Whether or not the person is satisfied with the result, the result is the result.
Oppenheimer was not satisfied with the result of the nuclear bomb, yet it is so.
Give me a f*cking break.
Or do you just like arguing with everything logical? Or is it just that you like arguing with me for the sake of arguing?
I don't argue for the sake of arguing, and your argument is hardly one that I perceive to be logical. Truth and happiness are two completely different things, just because truth CAN bring happiness does not mean that they are connected, or that is WILL bring happiness.
"George Bush says he speaks to god every day, and christians love him for it. If George Bush said he spoke to god through his hair dryer, they would think he was mad. I fail to see how the addition of a hair dryer makes it any more absurd."