The Black Vault

The World Trade Center floor plan.



This infrared satellite shot shows the absolute destruction that occurred on 911, note that all but the North Wing of WTC 4 has disappeared completely.. the two planes that struck the towers did not possess enough kinetic energy to cause this level of destruction!



WTC 3 in happier days.



Bill Biggert's shot of wreckage from the disintegrating South Tower tumbling onto WTC 3.



Biggart's next shot after the collapse of the South Tower, shows the tremendous damage the building sustained during the collapse of that structure.



After the North Tower collapse only part of the bottom three stories of WTC3 remained, the lobby stayed intact with pictures still hanging on the wall.

According to the official story, the massive weight of WTC2 debris pushing down onto WTC3, causing the collapse of the top nineteen floors.

The more likely explanation is that the thermonuclear demolition charges embedded within the debris from the collapsing towers, had sufficient potency to dissolve the concrete and steel that made up the structure of the building, the almost spherical pattern of destruction at the base of Bldg 3 visible on the infrared shot, supports that conclusion.



The massive hole that went right thru to the sub basements of WTC 6, was similarly caused by the thermonuclear demo charge tumbling down from the disintegrating North Tower, the ancillary damage to WTC 6 and the massive holes in WTC 5 visible in the above pic, were caused by the missile strike!

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1973&p=31662#p31662
Missile strike at the WTC on 911

Bill Biggert was killed during the collapse of the North Tower.

Ed: I would wish to see a coroners report re the state of Mr Biggert's body, particularly regarding whether he had suffered gunshot wounds, there are reports of small arms fire and video of a armed helmeted mercenary speaking in heavily Serbo-Croatian accented English, on the video 911 The Explosive Reality.. could be that he or someone like him "took out" BB, to prevent him recording any more revealing photo's!

The remainder of this post is from Spooked at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com

The official 9/11 story is a lie, the plane hijackings and crashes were a massive and cruel hoax done in order to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up financial fraud, and to further the ends of the global elite, and was only the most egregious of several other recent false flag terror operations.

There is evidence that WTC's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 were taken down with internal nuclear devices, WTC 7 appears to have been imploded with conventional demolition methods as videos show no concomitant vaporization, nor massive chunks expelled outwards during its collapse.

The massive, rapid outward, as well as downward and upward explosions of the two towers, the toasted cars, but not paper, and popping ceiling lights, the micron sized dustification of tower contents, the levels of tritium and heavy metals, the underground molten steel and high temperatures weeks and months later, all can only be accounted for by nuclear devices and their EMPs.


WTC 4

The fact that the explosions are simultaneously outward, downward and upwards means we have a spherical blast wave, such as occurs with a nuclear device, in fact, the dimensions of the towers likely required several nukes, the towers are much taller than their other two dimensions.

A single large nuclear, spherical blast wave large enough to destroy a tower's complete height, would have been too powerful to be contained in its other two dimensions, so several smaller nukes likely were needed, and used.

http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence ... eamers.mov

This video appears to show a central mushroom cloud at the end of it, the similarity to underground test nukes means that any and all nukes were set off at least several floors below any extant levels.

http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence ... erglow.mpg

The well known collapse/vaporization of the remaining steel core after WTC1 fell is seen at the same time that we see the so called nuclear glow, this is also analogous to the dipping of the radio tower of WTC1 before the top piece accordions into itself, then vaporizes.


The final state of WTC3 revealed just three floors remaining.

Did the nukes going off in WTC 2 vaporize these chunks before they hit WTC3? Did the nukes of WTC1 cause the outer shell of WTC3 to later vaporize? Did after-collapse nukes do this? Should we call these “cleaner nukes” in analogy to how the regime sends in its “cleaners” to remove evidence after one of their agents has performed some nefarious deed?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAKfBA8lBYg
YouTube - WTC 1 4 Base Explosions

Were deep underground nukes set off a few seconds before the start of visible “collapse” as audio and video indicates? Included herein is the supposed vaporization of the underground 50 ton steel press.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/se ... ombing.htm

This also dovetails with reports of unexploded micro nukes being removed from the Oklahoma City bombing by federal agents, after being placed there and used by other federal agents.. Bill Deagle MD reported that a patient of his told him, "we removed two undetonated softball sized micronuclear bombs from the Murrah building."

It is hoped that people never forget that this horrific event was nothing less than a wanton, nuclear holocaust perpetrated against the American people by their government, and used as an excuse to wage unjustified war against the innocent in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan.

http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/24/ward.htm

The US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic - WTC, by Ed Ward, MD.

Sources wrote:Declassified August 1958: Mere fact that the U. S. has developed atomic munitions suitable for use in demolition work.”

Declassified January 1967, The fact that we are interested in and are continuing studies on a weapon for minimizing the emerging flux of neutrons and internal induced activity.”

Declassified March 1976, The fact of weapon laboratory interest in Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR) devices. The fact of successful development of MRR devices.”

The factual evidence indicates that our government is using and has used 3rd or possibly 4th generation hydrogen bombs domestically and internationally. The evidence for international usage is not quite as strong as the domestic usage, but when domestic usage is considered the international usage seems inescapable.

The process of exclusion based on the known facts leaves only one viable option for the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings - a relatively pure hydrogen bomb.

Just some of the facts are: widespread cancer in the responders, molten steel, melted cars, steel beams hurled hundreds of feet, aerosolized metals, vaporized steel witnessed and video, aerosolized and pulverized concrete, elevated tritium levels, vanishing (vaporized) victims, only sliver fragments of victims on roof tops.

EMP - Electro Magnetic Pulse effects on communications, hundreds of eyewitness testimony of ancillary explosions by heroic rescuers and victims, massive dispersal of debris (large ‘missiles’ up to 1,600 feet - small ‘missiles’ up to 0.5 miles), demolition expert states hydrogen bomb needed for this type of demolition.

Audio of a massive explosion prior to collapse, video of ancillary explosions, audio of ancillary explosions, significant reduction in debris pile, ancillary thermate found in wreckage, shockwave of a mini yield nuclear blast knocked people off their feet, vaporization of 200,000 gallons of water.

Removal of wreckage without investigation, only remnants of fire in one tower minutes after the plane collision, unprecedented history of 3 skyscrapers collapsing secondary to fire, early miscalculation stating WTC building 7 ‘pulled’, towers fall at demolition or free fall speed, foreknowledge of WTC 7 immediate collapse, slow-motion video evidence of plane appendage with smoke and explosion immediately prior to impact of both planes.

Unprecedented NORAD non response to variant flights, FEMA drill scheduled for same day, military ‘exercise’ of exactly what was taking place to prevent NORAD response, most of NORAD protection planes sent far away in another ‘exercise’ to prevent response, prevention of examination of wreckage by those assigned to investigate, seismic evidence of a mini yield nuclear explosion.

Cheney takes over NORAD response command, Cheney prevents NORAD response, WTC towers designed for 757 collision and fire, 911 used falsely for previously planned war, government fabrication of ‘evidence’ correlation for starting war, hundreds of people found themselves trapped by locked doors and missing escape routes above and below the impact zone, and not all inclusively, but finally, Bush brands anyone noting any of these facts a terrorist.

The spectrum and percentages of cancer are massive, there are at least 4 classifications of blood-cell cancers: leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin’s and myeloma, as well there are many more classifications of soft tissue cancers including brain cancer, and breast cancer, for most of these there are subclassifications of many different types of specific cancer in each, so far not publicly disclosed. There are huge percentages of respiratory distress and loss of function.

Multiple reports of ‘irregular cycles’ (miscarriages?). Most likely there will be several more types of cancer to follow. In particular, responders should be checked for thyroid cancer and function. There has been no noting of birth defects which also needs to be done. There is one thing and only one thing that can cause all these cancers and problems.

RADIATION.

In response to this myriad of disease, a statement of environmental mercury has been claimed. That claim is not verified in testing of air and particle debris samples by private citizens and organizations. It is possible the mercury quotes are from the federal source of science, the United States Geological Survey’s analysis of the WTC dust debris.

The USGS’s leached analysis did show mercury at the 3rd lowest concentration of metals at the mean value (mv) of 0.011 parts per Billion (ppB). The most abundant element concentration in the leaching tests was Strontium at 1,000 ppB (1 ppM) - 100,000 times more than the mercury value.

It appears that the leaching of the sample was only partial and inadequate as the reader will see from the spectrometry values. Why would only mercury be quoted when there were so many other more dangerous elements at higher concentrations than mercury?

While the regular elements like Copper - mv 136 ppM, Silver - mv 1.66 ppM, and Vanadium - mv 31 ppM, some of the other significant elements were: Barium - mv 533 ppM, Strontium - mv 727 ppM, Cerium - mv 91 ppM, Yttrium - mv 57 ppM, Lanthanum - mv 46 ppM, Molybdenum - mv 11 ppM, Thorium - mv 9 ppM, Uranium - mv 3 ppM, Beryllium - mv 3 ppM, and Cesium - mv 0.6 ppM - partial listing.

For readers that are not familiar with most of these elements, here is a link to their relevance. There is also a claim of environmental benzene that ‘permeated’ the area in jet fuel as the cause of all of these problems. Once again, we have the quoting of the miraculous jet fuel that burns up in a massive fireball in the first few minutes, then like Christ’s feeding the multitudes, still causes a massive fire inside that reaches the temperatures of a Hades that weakens massive fire proofed steel beams and trusses, then resurrects itself on the permeated ground to cause cancer in one hour of limited exposure.

In less than 1 hour, the first WTC building had collapsed and covered Manhattan, in at least 1/3 of a Million Tons of particulate debris. Unless the jet fuel makes a final appearance and is again resurrected by NIST in it’s 3rd miracle, benzene is buried under 1/3 of a million tons of particulate debris after 56 minutes of exposure.

Benzene is also a component of gasoline. The assertion that cancer was the result of 56 minutes of exposure to minimal amounts of benzene is ludicrous. If that was true, everyone in the US would be suffering from cancers. As the 3rd WTC building falls, Manhattan is covered in two Billion pounds of pulverized and aerosolized building.

Two billion pounds seemed like an extremely large amount of particulate matter from buildings whose total weight has been quoted at around 3 billion pounds. Debris removal has been quoted at 1.2 billion pounds. Based on these rough numbers 2/3rds of the building was indeed turned to dust or vaporized.

Live loads on these [perimeter] columns can be increased more than 2,000% before failure occurs.” “One could cut away all the first-story columns on one side of the building, and part way from the corners of the perpendicular sides, and the building could still withstand design loads and a 100-mph wind force from any direction.”

Engineering News-Record, April 2, 1964

Click to enlarge

Take a look at a collapsed 10 story building in Pakistan. Note the height and size of the collapsed building’s remnants compared to the other 10 story buildings. The debris pile is about 30 feet, approximately 1/3 of the height of the erect building. This ratio is consistent with a collapsed building’s rubble height. Note the almost complete lack of fine particles.

The 47 story WTC 7's building debris should have contained at least five times (approximately 15 stories) the amount of the Pakistan debris as WTC 7 was also built significantly stronger materials. Yet, WTC 7 remains are casually noted in the government propaganda article as a 2 story debris pile. Look at the Pakistan debris ‘collapsed’ picture again, then imagine that debris with 4 more piles on top of it and finally try to imagine the awesome power it would take to break it into 53 micron or smaller dust particles.

Click to enlarge

The only estimates of the two 100 story WTC building debris piles are ‘several stories’. In the very few area photographs of the debris piles published, the amount of debris in the range of several stories is minimal at best. There is also quoting of debris 6 stories high, however, if the reader looks at the rare pictures, the only debris of that height are portions of outer beam skeleton towering significantly higher than the general debris. Not one official measurement of the debris piles is noted.

The building residue height is deceiving on 2 levels. First, all of the buildings had craters of a depth of ‘several stories’. Secondly, since the craters were in tiered sub-level flooring, the area of the bottoms of the craters would be significantly smaller than the area covered at ground level.

Well, I for one am sold on the idea that some type of small-scale nuclear device was used, based on the building turning to dust, the pyroclastic cloud, but moreso due to the molten steel existing for like a very long period of time.

I just cannot see how any rational person could surmise that these buildings were brought down in this manner by a plane crash and some small pockets of fire.

there were no nukes in manhattan. the whole line is utterly ridiculous.

Did Cole put you up to this to make him look better?

There is no radiation levels in Manhattan to indicate a nuke blast. there is no damage pattern that suggests a nuke blast.
Cell phones were unusable for many, but not all, that day merely because so many people were trying to make calls at the same time from the same area in Manhattan.
There was no EMP that knocked out electronics or there would have been no TV coverage of the evets nor would many of the still photos have been available since most cameras are now electronic and many film cameras rely on their internal electronics to control the shutter. They would all have been useless if there had been a large EMP. The only still cameras that would have worked would be 1980's vintage or earlier, and the only video cameras that perhaps could have withstood an EMP now reside in television museums. Vehicles would have been redenered useless as their electronic ignition systems fried. Land line phones would have gone dead as the pulse fried their switching systems. None of that occured. You are polishing a turd here.


There was no 'pyroclastic dust flow, fort. This is evidenced by the fact that people were hiding under vehicles as the dust passed over them within a block of the towers yet they were not cooked alive. Traffic signs very near ground zero were not burned or scorched. Hoffman postualted that his calculations showed that the dust had to be several hundred degrees yet when his calculations failed to be bolstered by any evidence that such had actually been the case he fell silent. You bought a nice shiny piece of crap.