The Black Vault

Wing-Zero wrote:

Tairaa wrote:

F**k the weak, eh?

Well.... It worked really well for us until we stopped that policy, and now we're not doing so well..

Maybe Darwin was right? Maybe the strong of a species being the only to survive and reproduce was a good thing?

Maybe.

Or maybe everyone should have a chance to live out their life unhindered by the plagues of nature.

I disagree.

Life isn't the way it's been portrayed to you, the strong and the smart survive, one doesn't need both, but one requires one or the other to survive in nature.

Defiance of this general rule has allowed a whole breed of weak people to come into existence. By no fault of their own of course, but these people who are more easily manipulated also get a vote! So..

Everyone deserves a chance, but IMHO nature should be allowed to take it's course, it would do untold wonders for us as a species.


Now of course, everyone will be in an uproar that I should even suggest such a concept, but take time to consider the following:

If you're a religious person:
Who knows better, God, or you?

If you're not a religious person:
A chain is only as good as it's single weakest link.

*phew*
In before the "You barbarian" crowd arrives!

Hey SRO, got your links yet? Yah know, the ones that show that vaccines work?

Thanks in advance.

Sadly, I agree with you, SRO.

Although we should have advanced beyond Darwin's Theory, I guess it's a loop we'll be stuck in.

Nesaie wrote:Hey SRO, got your links yet? Yah know, the ones that show that vaccines work?

Thanks in advance.

He never said he disagreed with you that they didn't work.

All he, and I, are saying is that in the optimal conditions, they can work and work for the better.

Sadly, I agree with you, SRO.

Although we should have advanced beyond Darwin's Theory, I guess it's a loop we'll be stuck in.

It is sad, I agree.

Lots of things in life are deemed sad, because they're not ideal for a person to experience. It's not ideal for you mentally to witness a family member killed for instance, this is sad.

However, it's kind of irrelevant what is sad or not in terms of what should be and what shouldn't be.
Which unfortunately is completely irrelevant to what is and what isn't.

It's a big cycle of shittyness that we live in, and no amount of compassion will stop that, just change it and put it in different places.

He never said he disagreed with you that they didn't work.

All he, and I, are saying is that in the optimal conditions, they can work and work for the better.

And yes, quite correct. Or at least that's the message I was trying to convey.

It either is or it ain't. If vaccines Don't work, why get them? They cause more harm.

What I've gleaned from both your posts is that they do work, or should work, according to theory. The facts I've read, is that they DON'T WORK.

Why argue against facts?

Or...show the studies that back your opinions.

It's a simple request. For anyone who vaccinates, please show the studies that show that they work. I mean anyone!

Nesaie wrote:Why argue against facts?

Or...show the studies that back your opinions.

It's common knowledge as to what vaccines are SUPPOSED to do.

Nevermind. SRO, you handle it.

It either is or it ain't. If vaccines Don't work, why get them? They cause more harm.

Uhm, not quite. I mean, they definitely cause more harm then they do good at the time being, no question about that.
But the "either it is or it ain't" is kind of wrong, because coffee or alcohol can be "evidenced" to be either good or bad for you in certain quantities depending on what is being looked at and the methods, so it's not as simple as a two-tone picture, it's more like grayscale.

What I've gleaned from both your posts is that they do work, or should work, according to theory. The facts I've read, is that they DON'T WORK.

My argument was not that if you get a vaccine it will work, my argument is that if responcible individuals made them, that they would work. Not for the flu, the flu mutates every single years, multiple times, and if therefore hard to immunize. Virii and bacteria like Anthrax, HIV, small pox etc that are severe and life threatening, tend to vary a little bit less, presumably due to being spread less.

Why argue against facts?

Since my argument is that in theory they can be effective, I'd like to see some studies that you have available that prove that they cannot be made effective.

I aint taking anymore Vaccines.

Especially for a Geneticly spliced Flu Virus grown in a Catagory 5 Biolab.

I could be wrong, and if so could possibly lose my life for it.

But history show's the herd is almost always wrong. And seeing how they already have a massive amount of volunteer's to have three live virus's injected into them. I think I'll just wait and see what happens to the guineapigs.

OneOfBillions wrote:Especially for a Geneticly spliced Flu Virus grown in a Catagory 5 Biolab.

Seconded.

Hahahaha, funny story I just remembered...

I went to this research centre one time to meet up with someone who worked there about perhaps getting me some lab time (which didn't work, but anyway) I asked the front desk for instructions, and he said turn right at the end and go straight, turn a left and the first door on the left.

So I walked seemingly to where I was meant to go, and to my surprise upon the left turn there is a big blast door with these signs on it:



Except the radiological sign said radiological emissions equipment in use, not like, radioactive materials in the open sort of deal. It said on a seperate sign that "All individuals require class whatever-it-is chemical and biological protection equipment" to enter.

And anyway, this blast door was being held open by a bucket that was sitting between the two parts.
So I was like "Well, I obviously took a wrong turn somewhere" and turned around and found the right area to be in.

It struck me as funny at the time, and CGs reference to a biolab reminded me so I figured I'd share.