So I take it people still haven't seen McCain's Twitter, confirming he was in fact playing an iphone app during the hearing? As for the "rumours", I mean reports, of Assad using chemical weapons. Where are you getting your information? Everything credible out there, at this point, says there is no direct evidence that Assad has done any such thing. In fact, the use of chemical weapons at this and many other sites hasn't exactly been confirmed nor unconfirmed. A lack of evidence that Assad didn't do it, is not evidence that he did. Maybe those beating the war drum have a yearning for more glorious round-the-clock CNN footage of bunker-busting, exploding goodness, streaming into their living rooms again. https://twitter.com/SenJohnMcCain/statu ... 1169506305
While we're at it; why aren't the reports from UN officials stating there is evidence that these attacks were carried out by the "rebels" being given media attention? Another question; Who in their right mind thinks another "regime change" would work? It's not like we have an extensive portfolio of successes to go on here. As per usual, France talks big but won't go in unless we lead the charge. The same can be said of every other "ally" we have. With friends like these, who needs enemies? This is nothing more than Obama trying to save face, and doing so quite badly. Putin is only illustrating what an incompetent buffoon Obama is, by remaining calm and logical. Apparently, obtaining evidence before bombing someone is a terrible thing when you're a Liberal. Of course, it's not surprising when you see them lose it in a debate and call you all manner of nasty things for daring to present facts.
The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.