441. Missing magazine and the drug dog (10/10/06)
When I found Feds tried to perform an unreasonable search and arrest by claiming they found drug trace in drain water, I had to take sponge bath and washing clothes by hands so I could splash the water on the ground to avoid a planting. (see "408. Unusual rain and blackmail on DA (5/25/06) 424. An unprecedented heat wave (7/30/06)")
I think they did so because they really could find some trace of drugs in drainage water. Where did that trace come from? I knew there are three contaminated sources. One is in the attic. The other one is in the garage. I think so because the Feds tried to get into these two places by disguising as roof contractor and garage door contractor. The third source is a fitness-exerciser. Someone gave it to my daughter on 12/2 last year. (see "363. A day to day persecution (12/7/05)") She put it at her room. Thus she became a spreader of drug trace although she herself is unaware of it. She polluted the bathroom; sitting room; chairs; sofa...... and the rest people in the house all contaminated by it.
In later September and early October, I heard bark in my neighborhood which I have never heard before. Feds moved the dog in nearby my house, I thought.
I read newspaper. I cut down interesting news and stick them on old magazine. Last week I found the sticking magazine was missing. It was replaced by some other new magazine. Where did the book go? I always put it in same place. Recalling the bark in my neighborhood, I suddenly aware this time the Feds planned to search and arrest by sniffing dog. To make sure the dog would charge at my hands, they got a magazine which is heavy with the smell of my finger. I worked on that magazine every week.
This is how Feds to frame a case. Let a drug dog charge not on drug smell, but on the victim's hand smell. To avoid such a frame, I stay at home for two weeks so far. I am afraid the Feds will do something big in October.
North Korea had a nuclear bomb test two days ago. There is no reason Bush administration was not aware of it in advance. They need it. A North Korea nuclear test plus a dirty bomb attack in US will give Bush a full justification to nuke another "axis of evil" - Iran.
Feds prepare for it for a long time. At first they arrested Padilla on "dirty bomb" plot. Then we saw it in "Boston dirty bomb" case last year. It was not that they had no will to do it. It was because they had no chance. All the "dirty bomb cases" were revealed and went soured.
442. Lidle's air crash in New York.(10/15/06)
The "passport" event made me think this is a designed case.
1. Timing. This is October, one month before mid-term election. Bush administration is losing the confidence of public. More people believe 9/11 was a government inside job. This administration will do something big to keep the control of the senate and the Congress.
2. Motive. To cover up a 9/11 flaw. Many people thought 9/11 leader Atta's passport was a plant. This case repeats the event to convince people that a passport survive from an impact and a huge fire is common. But do you bring your passport with you when you have a domestic travel? A drive license is enough for such a tour. Both Atta and Lidle took a domestic travel.
There might be a slim chance for the survival of the passport if Atta and Lidle put their passport on the pilot deck instead of put it in their pocket or in the travel bags. But have you ever seen people behave in such way?
3. A small plane is easier to handle then a big commercial air plane. Its speed is much slower than a commercial plane. To turn around a plane should be a basic operation for a pilot. How could a pilot with one year experience and a fly instructor not know it? A mistake impossible to take place.
4. Purpose of the plot. The accident resembles 9/11. In election time, to remind people of the terror attack happened 5 years ago. Bush is said doing nothing good but having only led in poll that he is tough against terrorist. (though the terror attack were activated by his own group in the name of terrorists)
The accident is a psychological operation to help GOP in coming election.
5. Another possible purpose is to justify a coming terror attack. There is reason for Bush group to organize another terror attack to keep grabbing the control of Capital Hill. So if such an attack happens, government will say, see, for a small plane, we can hardly do anything on it. Or, more likely, they shoot down the "perpetrator's plane" and declare a victory against terrorists. All words are from an unilateral side. Because in all these cases, so said "terrorists" were dead. (911 attack, Madrid bombing, London bombing) That's why the media prefer "suicide bombing " report. How easy is it? Just employ a poverty, tell him to deliver a bag to the target area. Plant a remote control bomb inside the bag. Then a "suicide bombing" is done. Or create a "terror cell" by its informant.
6. For a broad influence, a celebrity used to be chosen. So people will set their eyes on it. Unfortunately, Lidle was chosen in this case.
We can see same tactic was used in Michael Jackson case. Michael Jackson was arrested the same day when Bush visited London. It was used to distract public's attention from the humiliation of Bush. Bush met with a historical big protest of British people in London for his war crime that day.
We also can see it in recent Karr's case. Intelligence applied Jon Ramsey Benet
case on Kar to attract attention all over the country. Kar was freed on DNA evidence. The purpose of the case is to convince people that DNA is decisive in the case. For the propaganda, they borrowed famous Jon Ramsey Benet case.
7. The possible method in this accident.
We know drone is largely used in Afghan war and Iraq war. The news once reported Bin Laden was killed in a drone's missile attack. The remote control skill is now a popular technique.
911 attack was practiced in this way. So did in the Lidle's tragedy.
The only thing they had done was to install a remote control kit inside the Lidle's plane. Once the plane was in the air, what they did was to cut the manual control and let the remote control kit take over the pilot.
Whatever Lidle and the flight instructor try to do resulted nothing. They had to eye their plane flying to the building. They even couldn't escape by emergent kit because they lost control of the plane.
8. The biggest question here is: How could these Arabic flight school students so accurately pilot those modern, high speed, complex commercial planes to their targets (Remember that none was missing the target) while a pilot with one year experience along with a flight school instructor couldn't handle a small, easy handling plane?
Quote, "Stephen M. St. John
Precursors to Remote-Controlled Flights of 9/11?
Tue May 2, 2006 18:17
The 9/11 Commissioners ignored indications of remote control piloting of the jets of 9/11 brought forward by retired Army Colonel Donn de Grand Pre (among others), who had convened within days of 9/11 a meeting of military, commercial and civilian aviators and experts. Their conclusions, which De Grand Pre reported to the highest levels of the Pentagon, were that the jets of 9/11 could not possibly have been flown the way they were flown by Arab flight students and that the best explanation for these flights was that they were flown by remote control during the peak activities of multiple NORAD drills.
http:/ /disc.serv er.com/dis cussion.cg i?disc=149 495;articl e=100918;t itle=APFN;pagemark=40 <http ://disc.se rver.com/d iscussion. cgi?disc=1 49495;arti cle=100918 ;title=APF N;pagemark=40>
443. October surprise (2) (10/20/06)
For the mid-term election, to keep Bush's war party in bench, the Inside Group may have planned a big "terror attack".
1. The dirty bomb attack. The nuclear test in North Korea was not a coincidence. US may manipulate N. Korea through China. In my previous messages you know the secret police of China and US having a close collaboration.
The dirty bomb attack, not only will help Bush's party in coming election, but also justify a new Mid-east war - Bombing Iran.
2. A bio-attack. In October, there was a news said that FBI scientist Douglas Beecher thought the anthrax used in September - October 2001 attack "were not prepared using advanced techniques and additives to make them more lethal". That "A clever high school student" could make such a preparation, according to Ronald Atlas, former president of the American Society for Microbiology and co-director of the Center for Hearlth hazards Preparedness at the University of Louisville.
Combine with the "discovery of Lidle's passport" event, it reveals that FBI start a mission to cover up the flaws they made in "9/11 attack" and tried to "solve" it by scapegoat. So another bio-attack may happen too in this October.
The Lidle's small plane air crash in New York was not a coincidence, too. It was a psychological operation to pre-plant the mind of American people that a small plane attack is hard to prevent.
The dirty bomb attack or bio-attack may be carried out by small plane. All they have to do is to install a dirty bomb and remote control kit in a training plane. Then instruct a "terror cell" member to take a flight lesson. The rest we saw in Lidle's case. Of course, before the "terror cell" join the flight school, he must take an oath about "jihad" or royal to Al Qaida or something like that. Which will later be discovered as a convenient evidence the way we are now so familiar with. Either by finding a passport in street, a plan in his laptop computer, or a tape mailed to Al Jazzera.....
26 years ago, there had been an October surprise. A secret deal made between Bush Sr. and Iran in Paris. Iran would keep on detaining the 52 American Embassy hostages to humiliate Demo President candidate Jimmy Carter to guarantee GOP's victory of 1980 presidency campaign. As promised, Iranians released the hostages on the inauguration day of Reagan and Bush Sr. What was the payment? Arms and weapons which Iran needed. Which was later known as "Iran - Contra" scandal. Oliver North became a scapegoat in that case. The story government told people was that CIA selling weapons to Iran to exchange money to support anti-Contra movement in Latin America.
But do you believe that CIA was so poor that it had to sell weapons to its enemy for money? How could they pick up one of the biggest enemies - Iran as buyer when there were so many other buyers?
26 years ago they bribed our enemy to detain American hostages for the power of presidency. 5 years ago they killed Americans in the name of "terrorists" in order to have war in Middle-east. Now, for the war on Iran and the power of the Houses, what things can't they do?
Don't be blinded by the show of "hostility of North Korea". North Korea is as hostile as Iran to US. If the Inside Group could make secret deal with Iran then, why not with North Korea this time?
444. Surveillance warrant by link to "foreign account" (10/25/06)
My father in law and my wife had a joint account in Mr. Wang's securities company in Hongkong. (They are relatives). After the death of my father in law, that account became an individual account of my wife's.
In March this year, for the first time my wife filed the tax return through an accountant company. They filed the return without my consent. I found the dividend income of the HongKong securities company was not reported. Obviously this was manipulated by the Feds. It was a mistake a professional accountant shouldn't make. At that time, I only thought it was a trap of "income underreport". (see: "395. A sudden trip and the tax return trap (3/30/06)")
Then my wife stopped to deposit her paycheck into our joint account which is used to pay the utility bill. When that bank account dropped to the bottom in June, I had to cancel one of my life insurance and borrowed the money from another one to pay the bill. At that time, I only thought the Feds tried to block me financially. (see: "414. Finance sanction and life insurance (6/20/06)")
Early this month, I received a letter from IRS. It said it was done by computer. The computer found two missing parts in form "Report of foreign bank and financial accounts": 1. The account number and 2. My signature. At night, I told my wife I need a copy of the "IRS document". The development was astonishing. Within minutes, my wife went into her room, dressed well and ready to leave. "Where are you going so later at night?" I asked. It was 11 p.m. She said she was visiting someone. Seeing her departing with the "IRS document" at hand, I realized it was the Hongkong account caused trouble.
I studied the "IRS letter". The notice apparently was done by Feds, not by computer. Because there was other blank area neglected. A computer wouldn't make such a mistake - do a selective request. What was the deliberately neglected column? It was "26. Does the filer have a financial interest in this account?" It was my wife's money so if I am the filer, I should tick "no". That would against the Feds' will. So the "computer" neglected it. If I had signed the paper, then I would become a joint owner of that securities account. I filed report for years, the number of the securities account was always left blank because there was none. I asked my wife about it, her reply was "there is no account number". And there was never a trouble with IRS for missing account number before.
I recalled the previous cases and realized the Feds try to link me to that HongKong securities account though they knew it is my wife's. I am under surveillance all the time. For most time, it is illegal. To get a formal warrant they have to connect me to something illegal. I think Feds have turned Mr. Wang's securities company into a "terrorist financial institution" already. Mr. Wang is one of their target. (see: "392. 12/2 plot to murder Mr. Wang Yi Hong (3/15/06)") To turn a firm into a "terrorist one" is easy. Many "terrorist groups" are controlled by the Feds. Let one member of a "terrorist group" open an account in securities company, then a "terrorist" related financial firm was created.
To link me to that account, they dried my bank account. Feds wished me to take cash from that Hongkong securities account so they could apply a warrant on me. They always thought unilaterally. But it is my wife's money. I won't touch it. I borrowed from insurance contract fund.
I hadn't sign the IRS paper yet that night when I showed the paper to my wife. The surveillance team was so eager to get it that they thought it was signed when I told my wife "copy it" and ordered her to bring the document to them immediately. The midnight drama enabled me to realize the plot. I fill the form, make it clear that it's an individual account of my wife's.
Today mail-man took the letter. I used to mail it by certified post. But I dare not to these days. I am afraid of a bombing.
445. Dirty bomb attack (10/30/06)
In early October, the step down of GOP House leader - Hastert, was a hot issue. There was also a newly released information that Condoleeza Rice was briefed twice of the coming attack two months before 9/11/2001 which also could have become a hot issue in election time. Then, all these issues fade off from the media. That is unusual in election time. Why?
Those issues were used by the Inside Group to extort Bush and his Republican government to expand the Mid-East war - an attack on Iran. For this war, they have prepared a justification - another "terror attack" on US which resembles 9/11. I revealed their plot in advance.
Bush administration is willing to follow the order of the Inside Group. Only their plot was alerted. A revealed plot is a soured plot. That was not their fault. So the extortion is unnecessary any more. Now Hastert plays well in his stage; and no more word about government pre-knowledge of 9/11 attack.
I think I was very correct to alert people that "So probably there will be an October surprise. Another terror attack in US, (likely a dirty bomb attack) to justify another war." (see "440. October surprise (10/5/06)")
On 10/9, North Korea had a nuclear test.
On 10/11, Lidle's small plane crashed to a sky-rise in New York.
On 10/12, a warning of dirty bomb attack was posted in internet which claimed seven NFL football stadiums will be hit with radiological "dirty bombs". (That warning was reported one week later by media, the news on 10/21 said it was a hoax. )
On 10/15, media reported FBI raising questions over anthrax case five years later.
I don't think it was a coincidence that all of these happened at this time. The "dirty bomb hoax" could become true if the plot was not alerted in advance. The big casualty could give Bush an excuse to bomb Iran's nuclear plant.
On 10/26, the KTSF Chinese TV reported such a news that China arrested two North Koreans whom tried to sell ** gram of Uranium. (The news was not seen in other media, though) It will justify the source of dirty bomb if the attack happens.
There were conflict report about North Korea. One said N. Korea apologized to China and assured there were no second nuclear test. One said the busy test site means a second test is possible. It may reflect the conflict psycho of the Inside Group. They manipulate N. Korea through China. N. Korea did the test to the secret deal. The Inside Group has to make a payment. For not waste that payment, the plot may go on. So be careful with the "dirty bomb" or "anthrax attack'. Otherwise how can they explain if GOP still keep the control of Houses of Congress after election?
446. A candidate of the Feds (11/5/06)
In early September last year, when I received a letter from the councilmember Chuck Reed which offered a free dumping on 9/24, I realized he works for the Feds. Collaborated with the clean request from the Homeowner Association, I think it was a framed case of the Feds intended to claim they found drug trace in rubbish. (see: "342. Homeowner Association again (9/12/05)")
Then I found Chuck Reed is a councilman represents my area. As I have observed that Feds bought most residential houses in my area and moved in the agents and their accessories as residents, no wonder a man of their own was elected.
That's not enough. They want the seat of San Jose Mayor. For it, they arraigned Mayor Gonzales for bribery. It is a ridiculous charge. To avoid a strike, Gonzales
privately promised the garbage company a compensation. That compensation proposal of the garbage company was approved by the city council later. So the only flaw was Gonzalez hadn't told the council he made a promise in advance. (The compensation was proved necessary later by the council) That is not a bribery. But Mayor Gonzales was indicted "bribe" because "a third party was benefited" (the union got a pay raise) although he was not personally benefited. (see: "416. Big framed case (2)(6/30/06)")
Now let's see what kind of a councilmember Chuck Reed is. Two months ago he was revealed to tap taxpayers for gifts, group fees.
Quote, "Among expenses are political donations, life memberships". "Chuck Reed has charged city taxpayers for such things as his life membership in veterans organizations, donations to tsunami relief and cancer walks, and even his contributions to two political committees." (Mercury News)
After the revelation that he spends taxpayer's money to help himself, Reed said he would reimburse the city about $38,000 that he has billed to taxpayers but offered no apologize.
Chuck Reed now is said the most hopeful candidate for San Jose Mayor. One poll said he leads over his opponent by double digits. He is supported by local media Mercury News. In my community which I think most residents are agents and informants, I saw three campaign boards. All are for Chuck Reed. There is no surprise. Feds has all the resources. They control media, politicians and government offices.
But how could they indict a Mayor of "bribery" simply because a third party was benefited - a union got their pay raised? While at same time, a dirty councilmember - he has personally benefited by tapping on taxpayer's money - will be selected as Mayor?
The word "bribe" is overturned here in San Jose. US is no more a democratic country. It is a covert totalitarian. It is ruled by secret society - a Mafia like Feds - DOJ, FBI and DEA. They abuse their power to charge others but do whatever they want in same category. They send their own candidate to the control position: Bush as president;
Arnold as California Governor and Chuck Reed as San Jose Mayor.
This is how the Inside group rules the US: They pick up politicians by rigged election. (control intelligence) And justify the election by poll. (control media.)
447. Dirty bomb and Iran war (11/10/06)
I believe Bush administration has planned a dirty bomb attack on US and with which as justification he'll bomb Iran's nuclear plant.
1. 9/21. Quote, "Karl Rove Promises October Surprise
Ronald Kessler Thursday, Sept. 21, 2006
WASHINGTON -- In the past week, Karl Rove has been promising Republican insiders an "October surprise" to help win the November congressional elections.http://www.newsmax.com/archives/article ... 1615.shtml
2. 10/9. North Korea had a nuclear test.
10/9.(?) Debka reports that three US naval strike groups will be in the Persian Gulf opposite Iran.
3. 10/12. A warning of dirty bomb attack was posted in internet which claimed seven NFL football stadiums will be hit with radiological "dirty bombs".
4. 10/21. Three US naval task forces grouped on the sea opposite Iran in the Persian Gulf
Quote, "The American Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group joins US build-up opposite Iran
October 23, 2006 Debka
Tuesday, Oct. 17, the Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group steamed into the Persian Gulf to join the US naval, air and marine concentration piling up opposite Iran's shores.
The Iwo Jima group is now cruising 60 km from Kuwait off Iran's coast. As DEBKAfile and DEBKA-Net-Weekly reported exclusively two weeks ago, three US naval task forces will be in place opposite Iran in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea by October 21. The other two are the USS Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group and the USS Enterprise Strike Group.
http:/ /www.globa lresearch. ca/index.p hp?context =viewArtic le&code=20 061023&articleId=3575 <http ://www.glo balresearc h.ca/index .php?conte xt=viewArt icle&code= 20061023&a rticleId=3575>
5. 10/26. TV news reported that China arrested two North Koreans whom tried to sell ** gram of Uranian.
6. 11/4. Taiwan's pro-independence president Chen is accused of embezzlement and faces a pressure of resignation.
Quote, "Taiwan's president implicated
His wife, aides are charged in corruption case
Public prosecutors indicted Chen's wife and two former aides Friday on charges of embezzling money from a secret diplomatic fund under Chen's control. Chen himself cannot be indicted while in office." (By Joseph Kahn New Your Times 11/4/06)
N.Korea's nuclear test and the arrest of two N. Koreans who tried to sell small amount of Uranian, plus planned dirty bomb attack in US would give Bush an excuse to attack Iran's nuclear site. It was done in collaboration with China. In early November, China got its payment. One of its most hated - the president of Taiwan: Chen Shui-Bian - was in big trouble. He faces an impeachment in legislature.
One thing ridiculous is: The nuclear test was in North Korea. Kim threatened a war with the US. Should US have its naval strike force gathered at the Sea of Japan instead of the Persian Gulf? I put a missing ring here: A dirty bomb attack is planned to take place in US. That's something Bush expected to see in his crystal ball. That was why he moved US fleet into Mid-east in advance.
Rove failed his promise of an October surprise. I think due to my revelation. I myself is one target of their's. For more than a month, I tried to stay at home to avoid a bombing. To cover up a bombing in North San Jose, the plot planned massive attacks. (seven NFL football stadiums will be hit, according to the 10/12 warning) Although election is over, the possiblility of "terror attack" is still there. Because the target of Feds is still there.
448. Highway 680 pass-over bridge was a bomb target (11/15/06)
There is a small shopping center near my residence. There is an oriental super market there, plus some small stores. Since Feds moved a lot of Vietnamese informants in my area, the owner of these stores are almost all Vietnamese. Though it is the nearest food shop, I tried not to buy food there because I encountered most poisoned food there. I would rather walk 20 to 40 minutes to other markets where the food is less poisoned.
In later September, a food advertisement caught my eye. It was from a supermarket I often went. The food priced low were the food I used to buy. "Do they prepare the poisoned food for me?" I thought at first. Then, the Rove's "October surprise" news reminded me there might be a "terror bombing" planned. The supermarket located at the cross of Capital Ave. and Hostetter Rd. where Highway 680 passes through. I have to go underneath the pass-over of Highway 680 to that super market. However reluctant it is, it more or less can give Feds a justification that a Highway pass-over is a target of "Al Qaida". On 10/5, I wrote #440 to warn there might be a "dirty bomb" attack.
In October, I only went to the small shopping center near my house. In mid October, there was a RV parked along the road opposite to the entrance of that oriental food market. It distributed free booklet for Buddhism. It parked there for a week and so, never intervened by police or the land owner. I have experience that Feds used to use RV as temporary surveillance station. Then several times I saw big 40 feet container parked at the road side or in the parking lot. It was a small shopping center. A 40 feet container was very conspicuous. This was something I never saw before. Compare with the news:"The bombs, according to the posting, would be delivered to the stadiums in trucks." ("Dirty bomb' threat doubted" Mercury news, 10/19) Obviously the Feds tried to warn me, "this place is monitored, will be bombed". The purpose was to push me to the other market where a real bomb trap has been set up.
The intimidation pushed me to write "443. October surprise (2) (10/20/06)" and "445. Dirty bomb attack (10/30/06)"
After the election day, was the operation of October surprise over? At the night of 11/9, I went out to the street to have a look. Feds used to keep one or two cars patrolled the street around my house, 24 hours, I think. That night at 9:10, to my surprise, there were five. The surveillance intensified, because my revelation disturbed their Iran war plan? I went out several times that night to see how these agents operated. Each time, Feds called for 2 or three cars coming. Those agents, or support group, live nearby but have a fake cover up house in my community. Once called, they quickly came, pretending return home. At 9:30, there came an agent whose cover up house is opposite my lane. He drove his Ford truck, passed his house but not stopped, slowly passed me. I watched his car. At the cross road, he made a U-turn, came back and parked his car at the side where I stood. He came to me, asking a question, tried to start a talk with me. I told him I knew what kind of a man he was.
"What am I?" he asked. I really had no mood to talk to the man who monitored me for more than 10 years. So let him go on his solo. Agents used to turn a smiling face to their victims, but I know there is an evil will behind the mask. I was disgust to talk with him. He at last left for his "house".
What kind of man is he? He belongs to a "tire" team which having a tire company as cover up. Though the members later have different jobs as cover up. Their headquarter was at the next lane of mine. His cover up house is cross street, opposite my lane. The B-house Vietnamese in my lane worked with this team, once I observed.
Next day on 11/10, the man came into my lane, stood at my daughter's car, watched inside to write down some information. It was a provocation. I didn't say a word to him. He left when I took out a camera. Of course, he was ordered to do so.
Today, 11/15, a RV is parked opposite my lane. A psycho show off? Persecution intensified.
449. Harassing in internet (11/20/06)
My revelation of dirty bomb attack is very correct. Feds not only increased the patrolling car around my house, they also blocked me to access to many web sites in internet. In some sites, my thread was missing. When I tried to find it by "search", the page turned out was aimed at me. Here are some intimidation obviously from the surveillance team:
The requested object does not exist on this server. The link you followed is either outdated, inaccurate, or the server has been instructed not to let you have it." http://forums.caller.com/cgi-bin/
" you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
The search feature has been turned off at this time for non-contributing members due to server load. If it becomes possible to turn this on in the future for all members then we will do so. " http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/forums/ ... 08&page=13
Yesterday(11/19), I posted " 447. Dirty bomb and Iran war (11/10/06)" in a thread in halflife.com forum. Ten minutes later, I went back to that thread and found the whole article was missing. Instead there was a sentence "You bore me" which was not written by me. The Feds doesn't want people know the truth. They even replaced my article with their own words and made it look like written by me.
Today I went there and found #447 was deleted once again. This time he left with his name.
The page: "You bore me." (sentence left by someone who deleted the message 447)
This is not my words. My original post was changed in minutes. By surveillance team, I think. (my comment when I refill #447)
COMRADE: Nope, edited by me - I find it amusing. (Comrade Badger made a second delete and admit the words was left by him. )
I heart the FBI
Last edited by ComradeBadger : Yesterday at 09:33 PM.
450. Next plot (11/20/06)
Feds always attack people in the name of "terrorist". The tactic they used to use are: 1. Local terror cell such like in the cases of "Miami terror cell", "New York tunnel bombing". 2. Al Qaida warning. In each plot we always heard the threat from Bin Laden, or his vice Zawahiri. Al Jazeera did the work to broadcast their tape. 3. Terror attack in Britain. It started from last year. We saw 7/7/05 London bombing; 7/21/05 London bombing; 2006 August liquid bomb event.
2006 October surprise plot was a new invention. The role was the nuclear test of North Korea. One interesting phenomenon was in that period the other three traditional evil factor: local terror cell; Al Qaida and Britain terror story were all in vacation. Not a word was heard about them in US mid-term election. Because this time the guy on duty was N. Korea.
On 11/7, election was over. The shift for N. Korea was over. Was the dirty bomb and Iran war plan over too? It seems not.
On 11/10, Israel said it might strike Iran. The mid-east war is for the security of Israel. When puppet Bush failed to carry out an "October surprise". His master may do it by himself.
Quote, "Israel official: Strike on Iran possible
By AMY TEIBEL, Associated Press Writer
Fri Nov 10, 12:17 PM ET
The deputy defense minister suggested Friday that Israel might be forced to launch a military strike against Iran's disputed nuclear program - the clearest statement yet of such a possibility from a high-ranking official.http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061110/ap_ ... an_nuclear
At same time, on 11/10, Al Qaida and British intelligence came back to the stage again.
Quote, "Al-Qaida plotting nuclear attack on UK, officials warn
Vikram Dodd, Tuesday November 14, 2006, The Guardian
The warning comes after a speech last week by the foreign secretary, Margaret Beckett, on the terrorist threat facing the UK, and a rare public outing for Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, the head of MI5, who warned that there were at least 30 active plots to attack Britain."
To bomb Iran's nuclear site needs a big excuse. Nothing will do it except a dirty bomb attack (or even a nuclear attack) Beware of a "Christmas surprise". The bombing gift will come from your own government but packaged in the sheet of "terrorist".